280 likes | 398 Views
Characterizing the Function Space for Bayesian Kernel Models Natesh S. Pillai, Qiang Wu, Feng Liang Sayan Mukherjee and Robert L. Wolpert JMLR 2007. Presented by: Mingyuan Zhou Duke University January 20, 2012. Outline. Reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) Bayesian kernel model
E N D
Characterizing the Function Space for Bayesian Kernel ModelsNatesh S. Pillai, Qiang Wu, Feng LiangSayan Mukherjee and Robert L. WolpertJMLR 2007 Presented by: Mingyuan Zhou Duke University January 20, 2012
Outline • Reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) • Bayesian kernel model • Gaussian processes • Levy processes • Gamma process • Dirichlet process • Stable process • Computational and modeling considerations • Posterior inference • Discussion
RKHS In functional analysis (a branch of mathematics), a reproducing kernel Hilbert space is a Hilbert space of functions in which pointwise evaluation is a continuous linear functional. Equivalently, they are spaces that can be defined by reproducing kernels. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducing_kernel_Hilbert_space
A finite kernel based solution The direct adoption of the finite representation is not a fully Bayesian model since it depends on the (arbitrary) training data sample size . In addition, this prior distribution is supported on a finite-dimensional subspace of the RKHS. Our coherent fully Bayesian approach requires the specification of a prior distribution over the entire space H.
Computational and modeling considerations • Finite approximation for Gaussian processes • Discretization for pure jump processes
Posterior inference • Levy process model • Transition probability proposal • The MCMC algorithm
Discussion • This paper formulates a coherent Bayesian perspective for regression using a RHKS model. • The paper stated an equivalence under certain conditions of the function class G and the RKHS induced by the kernel. This implies: • (a) a theoretical foundation for the use of Gaussian processes, Dirichlet processes, and other jump processes for non-parametric Bayesian kernel models. • (b) an equivalence between regularization approaches and the Bayesian kernel approach. • (c) an illustration of why placing a prior on the distribution is natural approach in Bayesian non-parametric modelling. • A better understanding of this interface may lead to a better understanding of the following research problems: • Posterior consistency • Priors on function spaces • Comparison of process priors for modeling • Numerical stability and robust estimation