190 likes | 203 Views
This study focuses on the synthesis and characterization of electronically conductive lithium iron phospho-olivines (Li1+xFe1-xPO4) with enhanced electrochemical performance. The approach involves increasing the electronic conductivity through the preparation of mixed valence iron. The results show that the doped Li1+xFe1-xPO4 samples exhibit p-type conductivity and improved rate capability compared to undoped LiFePO4.
E N D
Li1+xFe1-xPO4: Electronically ConductiveLithium Iron Phospho-olivines with Improved Electrochemical Performance
Outline • Background • Approach to improved electronic conductivity • Synthesis • Conductivity Measurements • Discussion of doping mechanism • Electrochemical study • Conclusions
LiFePO4 Discharge reaction should have large negative Gibbs free energy: high discharge voltage—3.4 V Host structure must be light and intercalate large amounts of Li high energy capacity—170 mAh/g Host structure must be lithium ion conductor Structural modification during intercalation/deintercalation must be minimal—LiFePO4 and FePO4 are isotypic Stable, non-toxic, inexpensive Electronic conductor
Electronic Conductivity Mixed ionic / electronic conductivity is needed Diffusion will be rate-limited by slower species Electronic conductivities: LiCoO2 ca. 10-3 S cm-1 LiMn2O4 ca. 3 x 10-5 S cm-1 LiFePO4 1 x 10-9 to 1 x 10-10 S cm-1 Research Objective: Raise electronic conductivity of LiFePO4
Approach Increase number of charge carriers through preparation of mixed valence iron σ = n e µ where σ conductivity n number of charge carriers e charge µ mobility of charge carriers Metals: lots of charge carriers, increase conductivity by lower T Semiconductors: few charge carriers, increase conductivity with higher T or doping
Approach Substitution of lithium onto iron site may create mixed valence iron:Li1+xFe1-2x Fe3+(PO4) In point defect notation: 2+ x [ ] ] [ ' Li = h Fe
LiFePO4 showing Fe, P polyhedron PO4 Li M1 site (Li) M2 site (Fe) Both are Octahedral MO6 polyhedron FeO6
Synthesis of doped LiFePO4 Synthesis of Li1+xFe1-xPO4 x = 0.02, 0.035, 0.05 and 0.07) x/2 Li2CO3 + (1-x) FeC2O4.2H2O + NH4H2PO4 Li1+xFe1-xPO4 1. Jar Mill to mix and pulverize Heat at 350oC for 12 h under N2 atmosphere 2. Mix again in jar mill Pelletize Heat at 800oC for 14 h under 2.5%H2 / N2 atmosphere
XRD of Li1+xFe1-xPO4 x = 0.02, 0.035, 0.05
Lattice Constants: Slight Contraction of a lattice Constant Coordination Number 6: Li+ (0.90Å), Fe2+(0.92Å RD. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A32, 751 (1976)
Doped Samples Are Black Li1.05Fe0.95PO4 LiFePO4
Conductivity Measurment Direct measurement of resistivity leads to error owing to contact resistances R1 and R2 R1 R3 R2 In a 4-probe measurement, current is forced across probe 1 to probe 4 and the voltage drop is measured across probes 2 and 3. The resistance is is calculated from Ohm’s law
Determination of the Sign of Charge Carrier cold hot Thomson Effect n-type: cold end becomes negatively charged p-type: cold end becomes positively charged-as more electrons are promoted from the valence band to the acceptor levels at the hot end than the cold end and some of these flow to the cold end making it positively charged Observation: positive voltage at cold end—p-type
Doping Mechanism • Dopant concentration dependency • p-type conductivity • Nominal stoichiometry Li1+xFe1-xPO4 Observations are in agreement with • Li1+xFe1-2x Fe3+(PO4) 2+ x
Voltage vs. capacity of Li/ Li1.05Fe0.95PO4 as a function of rate
Capacity as Function of Composition and Rate Enhanced Rate Capability Relative to Undoped LiFePO4
Conclusions Li1+xFe1-xPO4 samples have been prepared Evidence suggests p-type conductivity in agreement with lithium substitution onto the iron site Enhanced Rate Capability was shown relative to undoped LiFePO4