1 / 45

Video Surveillance is Useless

Discover why video surveillance struggles for identification purposes based on Peter Kovesi's research at the University of Western Australia. This study questions the necessary image quality for identification, how to measure image quality, and the impact of various factors on image quality. Despite advancements in automated face recognition, both human and machine performance in recognizing faces from surveillance videos remains poor due to the lack of quality images. Dive into the attributes defining image quality and the frequency analysis of images for effective face recognition. Learn how the human visual system processes spatial frequencies for face recognition accuracy. Explore the importance of feature resolution based on spatial frequencies and chart measurements, and the influence of recording methods like video tape, frame grabbers, and compression on image quality.

aflint
Download Presentation

Video Surveillance is Useless

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Video Surveillance is Useless Peter Kovesi School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia

  2. Video Surveillance is Useless for Identification Peter Kovesi School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia

  3. Questions • What image quality do we need for identification? • How do you measure image quality? • What is the image quality from a video camera? • What is the effect on image quality when you: • record to video tape? • use frame grabbers of different quality? • use image compression?

  4. Humans are very bad at recognizing unfamiliar faces • Kemp, Towell and Pike (1997) tested the value of having photos on credit cards. When a user presented a card with a photograph of someone else that had some resemblance to the user, they were challenged less than 40% of the time. • Bruce et al. (1999, 2001) have tested the ability of people to match good quality CCTV images of unfamiliar faces under a variety of scenarios. Correct recognition rates are typically only 70-80%.

  5. Bruce et al (1999). Is this person in the array? If they are present match the person. Good quality photograph of target Array of 10 good quality CCTV images

  6. Bruce et al (1999). Is this person in the array? If they are present match the person. Good quality photograph of target When target was present in the array. 12% picked wrong person and 18% said they were not present (overall only 70% correct). When target was not present in the array 70% still matched the target to someone in the array. Array of 10 good quality CCTV images

  7. Automated Face Recognition is improving, but there is some way to go. Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002 Identification performance results: ~ 90% for a database of about 100 individuals ~ 65-75% for a database of about 37,000 individuals (US visa application photos taken with standardized equipment and with white backgrounds)

  8. Identification performance appears to decline with database size in a log-linear manner. database size system performance parameter

  9. Even with good quality images face recognition performance, by human or machine, is poor. • Surveillance video rarely provides good quality images.

  10. Even with good quality images face recognition performance, by human or machine, is poor. • Surveillance video rarely provides good quality images. What image quality is needed for face identification?

  11. Image quality is defined by many attributes • Minimum feature size that can be resolved • Noise level • Quality of luminance reproduction • Quality of colour reproduction.

  12. Minimum feature size that can be resolved… Frequency Analysis of images It is possible to build up any waveform by adding up a series of sine waves. The human visual system analyses many aspects of images in terms of different frequency components.

  13. Human Face Recognition In humans it has been found that face recognition is tuned to a set of spatial frequencies ranging from about 20 cycles per face width down to about 5 cycles per face width. The most important spatial frequency for face recognition corresponds to about 10 cycles/face width. To be able to recognize with some confidence you need to be able to resolve 20 cycles/face width 20 cycles 10 cycles 5 cycles (Nasanen 1999)

  14. Human Face Recognition ~ 160mm In humans it has been found that face recognition is tuned to a set of spatial frequencies ranging from about 20 cycles per face width down to about 5 cycles per face width. 8mm The most important spatial frequency for face recognition corresponds to about 10 cycles/face width. To be able to recognize with some confidence you need to be able to resolve 20 cycles/face width 20 cycles 16mm 10 cycles 5 cycles (Nasanen 1999)

  15. 1951 USAF Chart Groupings of 6 pairs of bars. Each successive set is half the size of the previous.

  16. 1951 USAF Chart 8mm 16mm Groupings of 6 pairs of bars. Each successive set is half the size of the previous.

  17. Eye charts also provide a simple way of measuring the minimum feature size that can be resolved.

  18. 6 6 20/20 Vision… … or in metric, 6/6 vision Snellen fraction Distance at which you can read the line on the chart Distance at which you should be able to read the line Minimum Angle of Resolution

  19. logMAR Chart Snellen fraction Letter height 88mm Number plate letters 80mm 6/48 72mm Average eye spacing 65mm 58mm 44mm 6/24 36mm 6/12 18mm 6/6 9mm

  20. Tests conducted with Pulnix TM6CN 1/2” CCD camera positioned 6m from the target. C-mount lenses: 4mm 6mm 8.5mm 12.5mm 16mm Images were digitized directly from the camera using a Data Translation 3155 frame grabber (a good quality monochrome digitizer).

  21. 4mm lens

  22. 6mm lens

  23. 8.5mm lens

  24. 12.5mm lens

  25. 16mm lens

  26. Expect to lose quality when images are recorded to video Camera image recorded to video, then played back and digitized. (Look at the USAF chart) Camera image digitized directly. (cropped images taken with 12.5mm lens)

  27. Compression is problematic. Test targets survive compression well, but faces do not. Original PNG image (190kB) JPEG images compressed using Photoshop. Image ‘quality’ can range from 0 - 12 JPEG image quality 0 (14kB) JPEG image quality 4 (24kB)

  28. Faces do not survive compression well JPEG (14kB) JPEG (24kB) Original

  29. Image from a Logitech webcam (640x480 image)

  30. A Real Surveillance Camera Installation…

  31. 4.8 m

  32. Image quality is defined by many attributes • Minimum feature size that can be resolved • Noise level • Quality of luminance reproduction • Quality of colour reproduction.

  33. Luminance and colour cues are at least as important as shape cues People perform about equally well using just shape information or just pigmentation cues. Fixed shape varying pigmentation Fixed pigmentation varying shape Original faces O’Toole et al 1999 see also Russell et al 2004

  34. Luminance and colour cues are at least as important as shape cues People perform about equally well using just shape information or just pigmentation cues. Image compression typically quantizes colour information very heavily… Fixed shape varying pigmentation Fixed pigmentation varying shape Original faces O’Toole et al 1999 also Russell et al 2004

  35. Conclusions • Surveillance video, as it is currently used, is almost useless for identification. • Surveillance cameras should be sited strategically to capture close ups of people as they pass through a constrained point, such as a doorway. • Image quality standards should be developed for surveillance camera installations. • Work is needed to develop measures of image degradation caused by compression.

  36. Conclusions • Identification errors will occur in biometric systems. As database sizes grow this will be an increasing problem. • Claims of misidentification have to be taken seriously. • Face recognition performance is poor. It should probably only be used for verification of identity (one to one test), and not for identification (one to many test).

  37. Conclusions • Identification errors will occur in biometric systems. As database sizes grow this will be an increasing problem. • Claims of misidentification have to be taken seriously. • Face recognition performance is poor. It should probably only be used for verification of identity (one to one test), and not for identification (one to many test). Tarja Halonen President of Finland Conan O’Brien US talk show host

  38. Conclusions • Identification errors will occur in biometric systems. As database sizes grow this will be an increasing problem. • Claims of misidentification have to be taken seriously. • Face recognition performance is poor. It should probably only be used for verification of identity (one to one test), and not for identification (one to many test).

  39. Conclusions • Identification errors will occur in biometric systems. As database sizes grow this will be an increasing problem. • Claims of misidentification have to be taken seriously. • Face recognition performance is poor. It should probably only be used for verification of identity (one to one test), and not for identification (one to many test).

More Related