200 likes | 355 Views
Search for the SM Higgs boson at LHC. Patricia Lobelle Pardo (Universidad de Cantabria) On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. XVII International Conference on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects DIS09, 26 th -30 th April 2009, Madrid. Higgs current limits.
E N D
Searchforthe SM Higgsboson at LHC Patricia Lobelle Pardo (Universidad de Cantabria) Onbehalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations XVII International ConferenceonDeep-InelasticScattering and RelatedSubjects DIS09, 26th-30thApril 2009, Madrid P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Higgscurrentlimits • Theoreticallimits • Finite and positive Higgscouplings • Experimental limits • LEP: mH > 114.4 GeV/c2 at 95% CL • Tevatron: Excludedthemassrange of 160 GeV/c2to 170 GeV/c2 at 95%CL • Indirectconstraints • Derivedfrom precise EWK measurements: • mH = 90 +36-27 GeV/c2 • (mH< 163 GeV/c2) (mH<191 GeV/c2ifincluding LEP2 results) A light Higgsisfavouredbymeasurements P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
SM Higgsproduction at LHC • Gluon-gluonfusion: dominantmode at LHC • Vector BosonFusion • Associatedproduction P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
SM Higgsdecays • At Lowmass ( mH< 2mZ ) • H bb: BR ~0.85 buthuge QCD background • Htt: accessiblethrough VBF • Hgg: veryimportantdespitethelow BR (~0.002 ) duetotheexcellentg/jet separation and gresolution • HWW*2l2n: accesible throughggfusion and VBF, BR~1 at mH~160 GeV/c2 • HZZ*4l :also accesible • ForHighermasses • HWW* 2l2v and HZZ*4l P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
ATLAS and CMS P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
State of the art • Better detector description and simulation:geometry, material budget, Geant4 • •New approaches to match parton showers and • matrix elements(ALPGEN + MLM matching, SHERPA etc.) • New (N)NLO Monte Carlos for signals & backgrounds • (MCFM, MC@NLO) • Sensitivities at NLO!! • ( NNLO maybe available before data taking , which will increase x-sections) NEW results with Full Simulation! Plus recentupdateson SM Higgschannelswith new CMSSW software FrameWork!! • More detailed, betterunderstoodreconstructionmethods(partiallybasedon test beamresults), improvedtriggersimulation, eventreconstruction and analysistools • Strategiestoestimatebackgroundsfrom data and expressAlCastreams • Improvedstatisticaltreatment(alsoincludingtreatment of systematicuncertainties) • Tevatrondata are extremelyvaluableforvalidation,work has started P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria) 6
Hgg • Small branching ratio (0.002 at mH =120 GeV/c2) • Final statesproducedthrough W, top and b loops • Importantchannelfordiscovery at lowmass (mH<130 GeV/c2) • Veryclearsignature: 2 high Et isolatedphotons • Backgrounds: • Irreducible:gg,gg+jets • Reducible: g+jets, jets, DY • Requirements • Goodunderstanding of electromagneticcalorimeter performance and calibration • Excellentg/jet separation • Goodmassresolution • and Vertexreconstruction P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Hgg • ATLAS • Vertexdeterminedfromextrapolationusingcalorimetersamplings • Convertedphotonsusedtoimprovevertexdetermination: 57% Higgseventshave ≥1 conversion • Signaldividedintocategoriesaccordingto • hg, #jets, #convertedphotons • Inclusive analysis + searchfor di-photonswith jets • Unbinnedmaximum-likelihoodfit • CMS • Backgroundreductionusingphotonisolation and kinematicinformation • Mggobserved as a peakabovebackground • Cut-basedanalysis • Splitting in categoriesaccordingtohg and lateral showershape variable • Optimizedanalysis • Loosesorting and additionalkinematical variables • Event-by-eventkinematicalLikelihood Ratio withbackgroundpdftakenfromsidebands, signalpdffrom MC P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
ResultsforHgg CSC 2008 • ATLAS • FormH=120 GeV/c2 and 10 fb-1 : • Inclusive analysis, usingeventcountingσ= 2.6 • Combiningthe 0,1,2 jets analysis +usinganunbinnedmaximum-likelihoodfit: • Floating (fixed) massfit : σ=2.8 (3.6) • CMS • 5σ discoverybetween LEP lowerlimit and 140 GeV/c2withlessthan 30 fb−1 of integratedluminosity • 5σ discoverywitheventbyeventestimation of the S/B ratio possible at mH=120 GeV/c2with 7-8 fb-1 CMS TDR 2006 P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
H→WW*→2l2n • Mainsearchchannelforrange 140<mH<2mZ • -Highestbranching ratio formH >140 GeV/c2: • 95% at mH = 160 GeV/c2 Signal: 2 high pT isolated leptons, MET and no central jets • Backgrounds: • WW, tt, W+jets, Z+jets, tW, WZ, ZZ… No mass peak (undetected neutrinos) Needs a good background understanding • Twomaindiscriminants: • Anglebetweenleptons in thetransverseplane : main variable toreject WW (smallopeningangleforthesignaldueto spin correlations) • Central Jet Veto forttbarreduction P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Analysisstrategy H→WW*→2l2n • ATLAS( em final state, H+ 0j, H+2j analysis ) • Preselection : • 2 opposite-signisolated and identifiedleptons • Cutsonmll, MET, Δφll, Zttremoval • Central Jet veto & b-tag veto • Final selection: • 2D Fit of transversemass and HiggscandidatepT in 2 bins of di-leptonazimuthalangleΔφlltoextract S/B ratio in signalregion • CMS (ee, mm, em final states, H+0j analysis) • Preselection: • 2 opposite-signisolated and identifiedleptons • Cutsonmll, MET • Central Jet Veto • Variables usedto reduce background : • pT of theleptons, mll ,Δφll , MET • Final selection: • Massdependentcutbased & multivariateanalysis • (optimizationfor 1fb-1) • Control regions: fakeleptons, backgroundnormalization CMS PAS HIG-08-006 P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Results for H→WW*→2l2n • ATLAS • Combinedsignificanceabovethe5slevelfor~mH >140 GeV/c2 UpdatedCMSresult: Sensitivityto a SM Higgsimprovedusing amassdependentmultivariateanalysis ATLAS resultstobescaledby √2 and to 1 fb-1 Improvements on Lepton ID , mass dependent cuts, more data driven approaches (compared to TDR) CMS PAS HIG-08-006 CMS TDR Cutshavebeenoptimizedseparatelyfor 1fb-1maximizingtheexpectedstatisticalsignificance. P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria) 14
HZZ* 4l • Signal: Verycleansignature( 2 pairs of isolatedleptons 4e, 4μ, 2e2μ)withhighbranching ratio except at mH ≈ 2 mW • Excellentmassresolution (1.5 – 2 GeV/c2for MH= 130 GeV/c2) • Powerfulanalysis in a widemassrange • Backgrounds: • Irreducible: ZZ* dominant • Reducible: Zbb, tt, ZW, Z + X • Selection of isolated (tracker + calorimeter) muon and electronpairswithoppositecharge • Isolation and ImpactParameterSignificancemain variables torejectZbb, tt • At leastoneZllonshell(Mass of theleptonspairssomediscriminationagainstthebackground) • 4-lepton massreconstruction • Peak in themassspectrum of thesignalmostdiscriminating variable against ZZ CMS PAS HIG-08-003 P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Results for H→ZZ*→4l • 3 channel independent • +1 combined analysis with several levels of systematic uncertainties treatment CSC 2008 CMS TDR 2006 5s • Comparable significance • Highly sensitive in the high mass region (200 GeV/c2 < mH < 400 GeV/c2) and in the 150 GeV/c2region, where the Higgs boson could be discovered with 5 fb−1 • CMS update: • Cuts optimised for 1 fb-1 and data driven methods for background optimization control • Significance of about 3σ can be reached for mH ~ 200 GeV/c2at ∫Ldt = 1 fb-1 • SM Higgs boson can be excluded for mH > 185 GeV/c2with ∫Ldt = 1 fb-1 • "look-elsewhere" effect:in real search, significance to be de-rated by ~1 sigma -1s CMS PAS HIG-08-003 P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria) 14
VBF H→tt • Importantchannelforrange 115-145GeV/c2 CSC 2008 Signal: 2 leptons or t-jets in central region, MET and 2 forward jets • Backgrounds: • Zjj, tt, Z/g*->tt • 3 final states : • Lepton-lepton • lepton-hadron (CMS only this) • hadron-hadron ATLASlepton-lepton + lepton-hadron final states5s achieved in therange 115-120 GeV/c2with 30 fb-1 • Invariantmass of thetpairreconstructedviathecollinearapproximation • (breaksdownwhenthe 2 taus are back to back) • Important items: • Tau tagging (Likelihood, NN methods) • tt rejection (b-jet ID and veto for lepton-lepton) • Z+jets background, especially at low masses CMS PAS HIG-08-008 P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria) 15
SM channelcombination 5fb-1 • With10 fb-1(normallyconsidered as one LHC year at lowluminosity), 5σ discoveryformH in [~120, ~500] GeV/c2 • With 5 fb-1 5σ discoveryformH in [~130, ~450] GeV/c2 • Combining results from both experiments, around half of this luminosity P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
SM Higgssearches at √s<14TeV • LHC willstartworkingwith center of massenergylowerthan 14 TeVaround 10 TeV • ► MainEffect: crosssectionchanges • Differentenergy of LHC has twoeffects: • ● Cross sectionforsignals (and background) • goesdown • ● Signal (Higgsproduction) goesdownslightlyfaster: • Higgsismainlyproducedfromgg and backgroundsfromqq • Efficiency and Acceptance: • ●Higgsbecomesrelatively “heavier”, • i.e.decayproductsbecomerelatively more central forsmaller LHC energies P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
CMS projection for LHC@10TeV • LHC 2009 - 2010 luminosity performance – estimate: ~200 pb-1of “good data” • Strategy: • Firstunderstanddetectors, • do SM measurements, • thensearchfortheHiggs… • Signal and bkgdyields re-scaled 14→10 TeV: lossof a factor of 1.5 in sensitivity, or a factor of ~2 in luminosity • Withroughly ~200 pb-1: Reachsensitivityfor a SM Higgswith mH~160-170 GeV/c2(comparable tothecurrentTevatronsensitivity) ( butregionjustexcludedbyTevatron) CMS AN-2009/020 P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Conclusions • IftheHiggsbosonisthere, ATLAS and CMS are readytofindit… • …unlessitisdiscoveredorexcludedfirst at theTevatron!!! • For a SM Higgs, with a combination of ATLAS & CMS @14TeV, between ~ 1 and 5 fb-1 are neededdependingonmassvalue. Benchmarkluminosities: • ~0.1 fb-1 exclusionlimitswillstartcarvinginto SM Higgscrosssection • ~0.5 fb-1- 1 fb-1 discoveriesstarttobecomepossible in theregionneartheoneexcludedbyTevatron ( MH~160-170 GeV/c2) • ~5 fb-1-10 fb-1 SM Higgscouldbediscovered (orexcluded) in full massrange (~110-500 GeV/c2) • LHC effortsfocusedtogetas muchluminosity as possibletogetsensitivityto a SM Higgsboson. • ATLAS and CMS are doingtheirbesttocommission and understandthedetectorstobereadywhencollisionsstart P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)
Post-discoveryquestionsthatwouldneedtobeanswered… • Isit a Standard ModelHiggs ? • What are thecouplingstotherest of particles ? • IsthereonlyoneHiggs? MSSM, othermodels? • Whatisits precise mass, width, quantum numbers ? • Doesitgenerateelectroweaksymmetrybreakingand givemasstofermions? • Higgsdiscoveryalsoraisesthe “hierarchy” problem… • Ready for Higgs discovery, but if it is not found, detectors are able to search for objects with similar signatures… LHC willanswerthese fundamental questions in thenextyears P.Lobelle (U.Cantabria)