1 / 14

The World Bank’s Experience with Country Environmental Analysis (CEA)

The World Bank’s Experience with Country Environmental Analysis (CEA). Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Europe and the CIS 7-8 March 2007, Istanbul. Outline. Background: Evolution of development focus Objectives of Country Environmental Analysis (CEA) Building Blocks

agagne
Download Presentation

The World Bank’s Experience with Country Environmental Analysis (CEA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The World Bank’s Experience with Country Environmental Analysis(CEA) Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Europe and the CIS 7-8 March 2007, Istanbul

  2. Outline • Background: Evolution of development focus • Objectives of Country Environmental Analysis (CEA) • Building Blocks • Examples of CEA

  3. Background • Development community and Bank CDF emphasize: • long term vision, • country ownership, • partnerships, • focus on development outcomes • good policy based on sound analysis • Need for broader environmental analysis is a part of this vision • Other diagnostic tools available, eg. Poverty and gender assessments – CEA an integrative environmental tool

  4. Objectives of CEA • CEA: systematic, country-level diagnostic environmental analysis • Objectives: • Integrate environmental considerations into country-level development assistance strategies and programs • Open avenues for upstream discussion of key cross-sectoral policy issues behind a country’s environmental challenges • Guide capacity building and institutional reform efforts

  5. Links with Other Tools and Processes • Draws • on work on sustainability and environmental indicators • Country led analyses: NEAP, SER, NSSD • Work undertaken by development partners

  6. Key Building Blocks • State of the environment and priorities for development • Policy analysis • Institutional capacity assessment • Scope: detailed or rapid • Collaboration with country and development partners

  7. Examples of CEA • 10 completed world wide; first in Belarus and Serbia & Montenegro in 2003; 10 ongoing; Ukraine planned • Policy recommendations and identified WB follow up programs • Belarus • Integrated environment into PRSP and CAS • Serbia and Montenegro • Contributed to identification and preparation of investment projects • Serbia EE Project; Montenegro Tourism Project • Led to institutional change • Tunisia decision to establish Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development

  8. Belarus CEA • Objective: To engage government and local stakeholders in dialogue on links between environmental management and underlying policy framework • Content: • Critical review of situation in water, energy, solid waste and NRM • Poverty dimensions of these areas • Macroeconomic linkages and long term sustainability • Recommended: policy actions in support of more environmental sustainability, and investments in above sub-sectors

  9. Serbia and Montenegro CEA • Objectives • Review the existing situation, identify priority areas for policy changes and consider roles of government, private sector and donors • Assess macroeconomic-environmental linkages • Provide basis for defining the Bank’s long term involvement in the environment sector

  10. Main Trends Identified • Deteriorating trends in water, sanitation and waste management • Threat of coastal zone deterioration in Montenegro • Air pollution hotspots • High energy efficiency • Excessive industrial pollution • Weak environmental management system • Transboundary water and global environment issues • Lack of sustainable forest management

  11. Recommendations • Policy measures • Policy and institutional reforms on CZ, biodiversity, EM • Identified areas for immediate investment, eg. Solid waste disposal rural and urban water • Areas for medium term investment: pollution hot spots, energy efficiency, reduce pollution to Danube • Bank supported investment projects

  12. Outcomes • Energy subsidies reduced • Water agencies agree on water charges • EU and donor support to environment management capacity building and legal harmonization • Biodiversity strategy • Environment mainstreamed in CAS • Several Bank Operations including two GEF co-financed

  13. Conclusions • Built knowledge base on environmental issues and priorities • Established dialogue with various government agencies during study • Clarify Bank’s comparative advantage in meeting the priorities • Establish donor coordination; and • Mainstream environment in sector operation thanks to integrated approach

  14. Further Information • http://www.worldbank.org/ • Search for CEA

More Related