390 likes | 615 Views
Overview of Memory. Atkinson-Shiffrin Model. RETRIEVAL. ATTENTION. Sensory Memory. Short-Term Memory. Long-Term Memory. Sensory Signals. REHEARSAL. Sensory Memory. Supplementary reading: Cognition (on reserve) Averbach and Sperling (course pack) Part 1. Capacity.
E N D
Overview of Memory • Atkinson-Shiffrin Model RETRIEVAL ATTENTION Sensory Memory Short-Term Memory Long-Term Memory Sensory Signals REHEARSAL
Sensory Memory Supplementary reading: Cognition (on reserve) Averbach and Sperling (course pack) Part 1
Capacity • Describe a simple experiment that could measure the capacity of “memory”
Capacity • Describe a simple experiment that could measure the capacity of “memory” • Briefly present some letters or digits and then ask the subject to report them • Called “whole report”
Capacity +
Capacity F S F E G S A U T O C G +
Capacity “Recall as many letters as you can”
Capacity • George Sperling - Systematic investigation of memory capacity • Result: subjects accurately recall about 4 items • What can you conclude from this result? • Maybe subjects can only hold about 4 items?
Capacity • Could it be that subjects had encoded all the lettersbut failed to retrieve the information?
Capacity • For example: What if they forgot the information before they could report it? • You would get the same result! • How could you modify the experiment to measure the instantaneous capacity, before any forgetting can occur?
Capacity • Partial Report - briefly present letters or digits and ask subject to report only some of them “Report the letters in the row indicated by the arrow”
Capacity +
Capacity U E S B O D W A I B V S +
Capacity +
Capacity Which Letters?
Capacity • Partial Report • Result: subjects can recall any 4 letters that are indicated by the arrow !
Capacity • Partial Report • Result: subjects can recall any 4 letters that are indicated by the arrow ! • What does this mean about the capacity of memory?
Capacity • There is some part of the perception system that stores huge amounts of information… • in fact, if only a single letter is probed, instantaneous capacity is seen to be unlimited
Duration • There is some part of the perception system that stores huge amounts of information… • But for how long? How would you design an experiment to measure the duration of this high-capacity memory system?
Duration • There is some part of the perception system that stores huge amounts of information… • But for how long? How would you design an experiment to measure the duration of this high-capacity memory system? • Vary the onset of the probe
Duration • Partial Report 10 # of letters potentially recalled 4 0 0 ms 500 ms never Probe Delay
Duration • Partial Report 10 # of letters potentially recalled 4 0 0 ms 500 ms never Delay Interpretation: Information dwells in a brief storage “buffer” duration of storage lasts about 1/2 of one second
Iconic Memory • a brief storage of “raw data” in the visual system
Echoic Memory • Auditory information is stored in a similar sensory “buffer” • Echoic memory seems to last for several seconds
Properties of Sensory Memory • Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)
Properties of Sensory Memory • Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds) • Virtually unlimited capacity
Properties of Sensory Memory • Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds) • Virtually unlimited capacity • pre-attentive
Properties of Sensory Memory • Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds) • Virtually unlimited capacity • pre-attentive What happens if you attend to information in Sensory Memory?
Overview of Memory • Atkinson-Shiffrin Model RETRIEVAL ATTENTION Sensory Memory Short-Term Memory Long-Term Memory Sensory Signals REHEARSAL
Characteristics of STM • Limited Capacity • George Miller • Subject is given longer and longer lists of to-be-remembered items (words, characters, digits) • Result: Subjects are successful up to about 7 “items” • Miller used the term “chunk” to refer to items in memory… • But what is a “chunk”?
Capacity and Forgetting from STM • Limited Capacity • Recalling takes time !
Capacity and Forgetting From STM • Naveh-Benjamin & Ayers (1986) • Showed that apparent span of STM is reduced for items that take longer to say
Capacity and Forgetting From STM • Brown (1958) and Peterson & Peterson (1959) • Subjects given list of “trigrams” • Rehearsal prevented by counting backward by threes • Showed that duration of STM is on the scale of seconds 1.0 Proportion Correct .5 .1 3 6 9 12 15 18 Delay (seconds)
Capacity and Forgetting From STM • Rundus (1971) • Long lists of “to-be-remembered” items • Primacy Effect – participants more likely to recall first few items • Recency Effect – participants more likely to recall last few items 1.0 Probability of Recall .5 .1 2 6 10 14 18 24 Position in list
Capacity and Forgetting from STM • Why do we “forget” from STM? • Does the memory trace decay? • not likely because with very small lists (like 1 item) retention is high for long intervals
Capacity and Forgetting from STM • Why do we “forget” from STM? • Does the memory trace decay? • not likely because with very small lists (like 1 item) retention is high for long intervals • Instead, it seems that information “piles up” and begins to interfere
Capacity and Forgetting from STM • Interference in STM is complex and specific