1 / 24

An Experiment Measuring the Effects of Personal Software Process (PSP) Training

An Experiment Measuring the Effects of Personal Software Process (PSP) Training. Prechelt and Unger IEEE TOSE May 00. Output reliability. Surprising data (no digit). Effort estimation error. Estimated/actual productivity. Productivity. Productivity. effort.

agrata
Download Presentation

An Experiment Measuring the Effects of Personal Software Process (PSP) Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Experiment Measuring the Effects of Personal Software Process (PSP) Training Prechelt and Unger IEEE TOSE May 00

  2. Output reliability

  3. Surprising data (no digit)

  4. Effort estimation error

  5. Estimated/actual productivity

  6. Productivity

  7. Productivity

  8. effort

  9. An Empirical Study Using Task Assignment Patterns to Improve the Accuracy of Software Effort Estimation Smith, Hale, Parrish IEEE TOSE March 01

  10. Goal This paper reports the results of an empirical study exploring the impact of four task assignment factors, team size, concurrency, intensity, and fragmentation, on software development effort. By adding these factors to the Intermediate COCOMO I model (hereafter simply referred to as COCOMO), its' estimates are improved significantly for the study project.

  11. What is basic formula? E is an effort estimate, expressed in man-months (MM). EDSI refers to the number of Estimated Delivered Source Instructions. The parameters a and b are determined by the application complexity mode; both of these values increase with application complexity. The effort adjustment factor, EAF, is equal to 1 for the basic level and equals the product of 15 cost factors for the intermediate and advanced levels.

  12. Effort Factors Based on a review of prior research [3], [6], [8], [12], four module assignment factors, team size, concurrency, intensity, and fragmentation, were identified as potentially significant determinants of software development effort.

  13. Model of Process

  14. TEAM

  15. INTS

  16. CONC

  17. PFRAG

  18. Models

  19. Models

  20. Experiment

  21. Model Comparison

  22. Impact of work asgmnt

  23. For Tues 9/24 • A Reference Model for Requirements and Specifications • Carl Gunter, Elsa Gunter, Michael Jackson and Pamela Zave • IEEE Software, May/June2000 pp37-43

More Related