1 / 42

Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for the ILC-GDE Project Managers

Global R&D Effort in the Technical Design Phase for the ILC I. Overview II. Superconducting RF Development. Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for the ILC-GDE Project Managers To be presented at the 2 nd AISA ILC R&D Seminar, Deagu, September 29, 2008. I. Overview. Toward Technical Design Report.

ahava
Download Presentation

Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for the ILC-GDE Project Managers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Global R&D Effort in the Technical Design Phase for the ILCI. OverviewII. Superconducting RF Development Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for the ILC-GDE Project Managers To be presented at the 2nd AISA ILC R&D Seminar, Deagu, September 29, 2008

  2. I. Overview

  3. Toward Technical Design Report Reference Design, 2007 --> Technical Design Phase, 2008-2012

  4. Reference Design Report, published, 2007 • SC linacs: 2x11 km • for 2x250 GeV • Injector centralized • Circular damping rings • IR with 14 mrad crossing angle

  5. Critical R&Ds in TDP • SCRF • High Gradient : 35 MV/m at the yield 90 % (S0) • Plug-compatibility • System Engineering (S1, S2) • Conventional Facilities & Siting • Tunnel: Deep/Shallow, Double/Single Tunnel • Accelerator Systems • Positron sources, • Low emittance: ATF, CESR-TA

  6. Minimum Machine Study M. Ross for PM • Physics scope (WWS document) • 200-500 GeV centre-of-mass energy range • 2x1034 cm-2s-1 • polarized electrons • Identify cost-driving requirements and criteria • Push back on them to acceptable minimum • CFS will be primary target • Underground volume and construction • Process cooling water • Definition document due late 2008 • Led by Project Manager Nick Walker (DESY) and ILC Integration Scientist Ewan Paterson (SLAC)

  7. Towards a Re-Baselining in 2010 Re-Baseline New baseline engineering studies RDR Baseline (VALUE est.) • Process • RDR baseline & VALUE element are maintained • Formal baseline • MM elements needs to be studies/reviewed internationally • Regional balance in the AP&D groups involved • Regular meetings and discussions (but top-down control from PM) • Formal review and re-baseline process beginning of 2010 • Exact process needs definition (a PM action item for 2009) • Community sign-off mandatory MM studies MM def (RDR ACD concepts and R&D) Non-baseline elements 2009 2010 2012

  8. Main Linac Specific • Removal of support tunnel (single tunnel) • klystron cluster • XFEL-like • Dubna option (surface klystron gallery)? • Klystron Cluster (HLRF) • 30 klystrons located in localised surface buildings • ~300 MW RF power distributed in beam tunnel via over-moded waveguide • effectively ~1km RF unit • Marx modulator • Reduced cost solution for process-water cooling • Higher DT specification alternative options

  9. High Power RF distribution using Over-moded waveguide cluster building The waveguides share a shaft down to the accelerator tunnel and then turn, one upstream and one downstream to feed, through periodic tap-offs, a combined 64 RF units, or ~2.5 km of linac. • service tunnel eliminated • underground heat load greatly reduced shaft upstream downstream accelerator tunnel

  10. Minimum Machine: Current Definition • “Minimum Machine” now refers to a set of identified options (elements) to be studied which may reduce the cost. • Not a minimum in a definable sense • But a potential reduced-cost solutions… • with a potential higher performance risk or operational impact • An alternative design (ACD-like) for study purposes • Comparison with RDR baseline • Cost (not performance) driven • options which were not studied during RDR phase • Important to restrict options to manageable levels • available resources • Must consider both peak and integratedperformance Other “VALUE Engineering” Activities (parallel)

  11. 2. SCRF

  12. SCRF: Outline • Requirements • R&D Status • Fundamental research with single-cell cavities • Progress in 9-cell cavities • Plan for Technical Design Phase • High Gradient, • Plug-compatible Engineering • Global Plan and Effort • Summary

  13. TDP Goals of ILC-SCRF R&D • Field Gradient • 35 MV/mfor cavity performance (S0) • 31.5 MV/m (10 % lower) for operational gradient • to build two x 11 km SCRF main linacs • Cavity & Cryomodule Integration with • “Plug-compatible” concept to: • Encourage “improvement” and creative work in R&D phase • Motivate practical ‘Project Implementation’ to share intellectual work in global effort • Accelerator System Engineering andTests • Cavity-string in one cryomodule (S1, S1-global) • Cryomodule-string with Beam Acceleration (S2) • With one RF-unit containing 3 crymodule

  14. Cavity Shape Design Investigated • TESLA • Lower E-peak • Lower risk of field emission • LL/IS, RE • Lower B-peak • Potential to reach higher gradient LL: low-loss, IS: Ichiro-shape, RE: re-entrant

  15. Progress in Single Cell Cavity • Record of 59 MV/m achieved with the RE cavity with EP, BCP and pure-water rinsing with collaboration of Cornell and KEK • (K. Saito, H. Padamsee et al. , SRF-07)

  16. R&D Status of 9-Cell Cavity • Europe • “Gradient” improved (<31.5> MV/m) with Ethanol rinse (DESY): • Large-grain cavity (DESY) • Surface process with baking in Ar-gas (Saclay) • Industrial (bulk) EP demonstrated (<36> MV/m) (DESY) • America(s) • Basic research and surface process (Cornell, JLab, Fermilab) • Field emission reduced with Ultrasonic Degreasing using Detergent, and “Gradient” improved (JLab) • Large-grain cavity (<36> MV/m) (JLab) • Surface process facility (Fermilab/ANL) • Vertical (cold) test facility with thermometry (Fermilab) • Asia • “Gradient” demonstrated, 36MV/m (LL, KEK-JLab), and 28 MV/m (TESLA-like in cryomodule, KEK) • Optical inspection system (KEK)

  17. “Operational Field Gradient” in progress at TESLA/FLASH toward EuroXFEL ILC operation： • <31.5> MV/m R&D Status： • ~ 30 MV/m to meet XFEL requirement • We need 20 % improvement to meet ILC requirement

  18. DESY: Field Emission Analysis • MV/m 30 40 Cavity gradient shifted to High Gradient by ‘ethanol rinse’, except for “lowest two” (due to different reasons)

  19. Industrial EP at DESY/Plansee • The average gradient, 36 MV/m, achieved with AC115-118

  20. 9-cell Progress in American Laboratorieswith Japanese contribution for ICHIRO-5 A (Accell), AES: TESLA shape, ICHITO: LL shape 24

  21. 9-cell LL Cavity, Ultrasonic Degreasing“ICHIRO-5” Studies at JLab-KEK Ultrasonic Cleaning with degreaser very effective to reduce field emission

  22. TESLA-like 9-Cell Cavity at KEK Cryomodule/Horizontal test Result June 30 – July 25. 2008: with warm coupler and klystron connection for only BL#2: 28 MV/m achieved

  23. SCRF Activities in Asia • Participation in STF at KEK • Cryomodule and coupler design (IHEP) • 9-cell cavity fabrication (PAL) • LL single cell (IHEP) • Cavity design/processing (PNU/KNU) • Joining STF operation (RRCAT) • China • Cavity fabrication (Deep drawing, EBW, CB) (IHEP,PKU.) • Large grain cavity (Ningxia, PKU) • Korea • Works other than SCRF (RTML design, cavity BPM, DR) • India • Nb material investigation • Cavity fabrication in cooperation with FNAL • Cavity process in cooperation with KEK

  24. Outline • Introduction • R&D Status • Fundamental research (with single cell cavities) • Progress in 9-cell cavities • Plan for Technical Design Phase • High Gradient, • Plug-compatible Engineering • Global Plan • Summary

  25. Plan for Further High Gradient R&D 1: Research/find cause of gradient limit for quench: high resolution camera for field emission: further surface analysis 2: develop countermeasures for quench: remove beads & pits, 3: verify countermeasures exchange problem/information 4: Integrate the countermeasures install the countermeasure world-wide and get statistics

  26. A New High Resolution, Optical Inspection System For visual inspection of cavity inner surface. motor & gear for mirror camera & lens ~600µm beads on Nb cavity EL EL Camera system (7µm/pix) in 50mm diameter pipe. white LED half mirror camera sliding mechanism of camera mirror perpendicular illumination by LED & half mirror tilted sheet illumination by Electro-Luminescence Iwashita (Kyoto) and Hayano (KEK) et al.

  27. Guideline: Standard Procedure and Feedback Loop w/o optical inspection

  28. Guideline: Standard Procedure and Feedback Loop w optical inspection w optical inspection w optical inspection

  29. Comparison with each treatment #4 cell equator, Z=516mm, t=103 deg EP-1 (25 + 100 um removed) EP-1 (25 um removed) After Fabrication

  30. Progress and Plan forCavity-Cryomdule Integration • Europe (EU) • Input-coupler industrial assessment for XFEL (LAL-Orsay) • America(s) (AMs) • Cryomodule design (FNAL) • Cryogenic engineering (FNAL in cooperation with CERN) • SCRF Test Facility (FNAL) • Asia (AS) • Cryomodule engineering design (KEK/IHEP) • Superconducting test facility (KEK) • A global effort for Cavity/Cryomodule Assembly • Plug-compatible integration and test in cryomodule:

  31. Plug-compatibly of Cavities Important for Global Cooperation Plug-compatible interface need to be established

  32. Plug compatible conditions at Cavity package (example)

  33. Why “Plug compatible” Integration and Engineering ? • Encourage R&D effort specially to improve the “gradient” • Cavity Type: Tesla, Low-loss (Ichiro), Re-entrant • Material: Fine-grain or large grain • Preparation: EP, Rinsing, • Tuner type: various designed w/ various arguments, • Input-coupler: Fixed, Tunable, However, • The “plug –compatible” concept is important, • Beam pipe, cryogenics, and RF connections: need to be “plug-compatible” • Cavity-Integration in Cryomodule: R&D inglobal effort

  34. Intending “plug-compatibility” • Cavity • Status: still in “basic research” to improve field gradient (limit), • Establish: unified interface conditions, • Keep: “room” to improve field gradient, • Cryomodule • Status: ready for “system engineering” • Establish: unified interface conditions, • Intend: nearly identical engineering design • But: need to adapt to each regional industrial constraints (for example: High Pressure Code)

  35. Cavity and Cryomodule Performance Testwith Plug Compatibility, in Global Effort • Cavity integration and the String Test to be organized with: • 2 cavities from DESY and Fermilab • 4 cavities from KEK • Each half-cryomoducle from INFN and KEK

  36. Beam Acceleration Test with one RF Unit (S2) Plan for KEK-STF-2 in ILC-TDP2

  37. Outline • Introduction • R&D Status • Fundamental research (with single cell cavities) • Progress in 9-cell cavities • Plan for Technical Design Phase • Cavity Gradient, • Plug-compatible Engineering • Global Plan and Effort • Summary

  38. Global Plan for SCRF R&D

  39. Cooperation with EuroXFEL and Other Projects European X-ray Free Electron Laser Facility • EuroXFEL SRF design gradient：　25 MV/m • ~ 100 SCRF cryomodule, based on the experience at TTF, DESY, • Leading SCRF industrialization (scale: 1/20 of ILC, in coming 5 years) • Keep close cooperation with XFEL, on-going project. Further SCRF Accelerator Project Plans investigated: • Project X at Fermilab, SC Proton Linac at CERN, and ERL at KEK

  40. Summary • Technical Design Phase in progress: • Phase-1: Technical reality to beexamined, • 35 MV/m with yield 50 % for 9-cell cavity and • < 31.5 MV/m> with the cavity-string in a cryomodule • Plug-compatible crymodule to be examined with global effort. • Phase-2: Technical credibility to be verified • 35 MV/m with the yield 90 % for 9-cell cavity field gradient of • System engineering and beam acceleration with one RF unit and 3 cryomodules with the field gradient <31.5> MV/m. • We aim for • Global cooperation for the ILC SCRF technology with having plug-compatibility, and with scoping smooth extension to the ILC construction/production phase.

  41. Backup

  42. ILC-GDE Project Management in TDP ILC Council (ILCSC) Funding Agencies and Institutions Global Design Effort Accelerator Advisary Panel Executive Committee Membership: TBD Director Project Management Office EDMS Cost Management Asia Americas Europe SCRF CF&S Acc. Sys. Instit. …. Institution Institution Institution Instit. ….

More Related