1 / 47

Robert Elliott University of Strathclyde

Person-Centered Science: What We Know and How We Can Learn More about Humanistic/Person-Centered/Experiential Psychotherapies. Robert Elliott University of Strathclyde. Outline. Historical Introduction

aiden
Download Presentation

Robert Elliott University of Strathclyde

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Person-Centered Science: What We Know and How We Can Learn More about Humanistic/Person-Centered/Experiential Psychotherapies Robert Elliott University of Strathclyde

  2. Outline • Historical Introduction • Question 1: What have we learned from existing quantitative research on Humanistic/Person-Centred/Experiential therapies? • Question 2: What have we learned from existing qualitative research on Humanistic/Person-Centred/Experiential therapies? • Question 3: How can we learn more?

  3. Context: Carl Rogers as Psychotherapy Research Pioneer • Innovations: • Use of voice recording technology • Psychotherapy process research • Controlled outcome research • Modern process-outcome research

  4. Humanistic Therapy in Eclipse • Rogers gave up scientific research when he moved to La Jolla • Lack of research 1965 - 1990 hurt scientific & academic standing of humanistic therapy • Led to humanistic therapies being marginalized

  5. Humanistic Therapy Revival • Since 1990: • Rise of qualitative research • Re-engagement in quantitative research • Newer therapies (e.g., Focusing-oriented, Process-Experiential/Emotion-Focused Therapy, Pre-therapy) • Available outcome research has tripled

  6. Current situation • Danger of split between: • Practitioners and training schools: reject quantitative research in favor of qualitative research • Small cadre of academic researchers: doing quantitative outcome research in order to gain official recognition

  7. Question 1a: What Does Positivist Outcome Research Tell Us? • Humanistic/Person-Centred/Experiential (HPCE) meta-analysis project • Meta-analysis: analysis of results • Effect size = standardized difference statistic • Creates a common for comparing results

  8. The HPCE Meta-Analysis Project • 1st Generation: Greenberg, Elliott & Lietaer, 1994 (n= 36 studies) …. • 5th Generation: Elliott & Freire (2008): • Supported by a grant from the British Association for the Person-Centred Approach • 180+ studies • 200+ samples of clients • >13,000 clients • 60 controlled studies (vs. no therapy or waitlist) • 110 comparative studies (vs. HPCE therapies)

  9. Elliott & Freire (2008) Meta-analysis Preliminary Results • 1. HPCE therapies associated with large pre-post client change • Effect size: 1.03 sd [standard deviation units] • = a very large effect • 2. Clients’ large posttherapy gains are maintained over early & late follow-ups • Post: .95sd => early follow-up: 1.08sd => late follow-up (12+ months): 1.14

  10. Elliott & Freire (2008) Meta-analysis Preliminary Results • 3. Clients in HPCE therapies show large gains relative to untreated clients • Effect size: .81 sd = a large effect size • Proves therapy causes client change.

  11. Elliott & Freire (2008) Meta-analysis Preliminary Results • 4. HPCE therapies in general are clinically and statistically equivalent when compared to other treatments(combining CBT and other therapies) • Effect size: .01 sd • = no difference in amount of change • Held true even when we only considered randomized (“gold standard”) studies

  12. Elliott & Freire (2008) Meta-analysis Results • 5. Comparison to Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT): • HPCE therapies as a group slightly but trivially less effective than CBT: • Effect size: -.18 sd • =trivially worse (a small effect) • But…

  13. Elliott & Freire (2008) Meta-analysis Results • 6. Researcher theoretical allegiance effects strongly predict comparative ES: • Correlation between comparative ES and theoretical allegiance of researcher: -.52 • CBT-oriented researchers => worse effects for HPCE • Small negative effect for HPCE therapies vs. CBT disappears after statistically controlling for researcher allegiance

  14. Where does researcher allegiance effect come from? • Big differences in how different HPCE therapies do in comparison to CBT

  15. What is “Nondirective/ Supportive” Therapy? • Nondirective/supportive: • 87% studies carried out by CBT Researchers (40/46 in total sample) • 65% explicitly labelled as “controls” (30/46) • 52% involve non bona fide therapies (24/46) • 76% of researchers are North American (35/46) • 61% involve depressed or anxious clients (28/46)

  16. The Moral of this Story: • We don’t have to be afraid of quantitative research or RCTs • But if we let others define our reality, we are going to be in trouble. • Therefore, we need to do our own outcome research… including RCTs

  17. Question 1b: What does Quantitative Process-Outcome Research Tell Us? • Process-outcome research predicts outcome from in-therapy process measures, e.g., therapist empathy • Best-known process variable is Therapeutic Alliance • Most common measure: Working Alliance Inventory • Meta-analyses show that alliance predicts outcome: e.g., Horvath & Bedi, 2002; n = 90 studies: mean r = .21

  18. Process-Outcome Research on Therapist Empathy • Therapist empathy is one of the strongest predictors of outcome • Bohart et al. (2002) meta-analysis • 47 studies: mean r = .32 • Accounts for about 10% of the variance in outcome

  19. Interpretation of r = .32 • 1. Optimist’s view: 10% is a lot! • One of the best predictors of outcome • Maybe even better that therapeutic alliance

  20. Interpretation of r = .32 • 2. Pessimist’s view: The glass is 90% empty! • Rogers’ “necessary & sufficient” predicts perfect correlation (r = 1.0) • r = .32 decisively refutes Rogers’ hypothesis

  21. Interpretation of r = .32 • 3. Optimist’s rebuttal: 10% is almost 100% of what we can reasonably expect from the real world • Client individual differences in problem severity and resources predict most of outcome • Measurement error • Restriction of range (not enough unempathic therapists!) • Other stuff

  22. Interpretation of r = .32 • 4. Pessimist’s plea: I still want the other 90%…

  23. Question 2: What does Qualitative Research Tell Us? • Rogers’ Process Equation was based on proto-qualitative research: • Years of careful observation of productive and unproductive therapy sessions • Systematic qualitative research is a relatively recent development • But mature enough now to allow a few small qualitative meta-analyses

  24. 1. Helpful and Hindering Factors • Greenberg et al. (1994) • Reviewed 14 studies of HPCE therapies • Selected 5 most frequent helpful and 3 most frequent hindering aspects • 14 categories of Helpful aspects, grouped into 4 larger domains

  25. Most Common Helpful Aspects in HPCE therapies • 1. Positive Relational Environment (7 out of 14 data sets; e.g., empathy) => • 2. Client's Therapeutic Work (13 sets) • Most common : Self-Disclosure, Involvement => • 3. Therapist Facilitation of Client's Work (6 sets; e.g., fostering exploration) => • 4. Client Changes or Impacts (12 sets) • Most common: Understanding/ Insight, Awareness/Experiencing

  26. Most Common Hindering Aspects • Much less common; difficult to study • Most common:Intrusiveness/ Pressure • Even in person-centered therapy • Also present: • Confusion/Distraction (derailing the client's process) • Insufficient Therapist Direction

  27. 2. Client Post-therapy Changes • Qualitative outcome • Jersak, Magana and Elliott (2000; in Elliott, 2002) • 5 studies, mostly Process-Experiential for depression or trauma

  28. Jersak et al. (2000) • Vitalizing the Self: Internal change • 4 subprocesses: • Leaving Distress Behind => • Increased Contact with Emotional Self => • Improved Self-esteem => • Increased Sense of Personal Power/Coping/Self-control • Describe the first phase of a metaphorical journey

  29. Jersak et al. (2000) • Changes in the Self’s Relationships to Others/World: • 3 subprocesses: • Defining Self with Others/Asserting Independence • Engaging with Others, • Experiencing the World More/Mobilizing Self to Act in the World • Describe the outward phase of the client’s journey

  30. 3. Effects of significant therapy events • Timulak (2007) • 7 studies, most HPCE • 9 common categories • All 7 studies: • Awareness/Insight/Self-Awareness • Reassurance/Support/Safety • More than half the studies: • Behavior Change/Problem Solution • Exploring Feelings/Emotional Experiencing • Feeling Understood.

  31. Implication: Qualitative Studies of HPCE • May be possible to integrate these 3 types of research into a model of HPCE change process • Framework: • Helpful (hindering) aspects => • Immediate effects (significant events) => • Qualitative outcome

  32. Question 3: How Can We Learn More?

  33. 1. Be Methodologically Pluralist • Most sensible course of action: • To encourage both kinds of research • Render politically expedient quantitative data to the government and professional bodies (“Caesar”) • Simulaneously carry out qualitative research that completely honors person-centered principles • Even in the same study

  34. 2. Follow Person-Centred Research Principles • E.g., Mearns & McLeod (1984) • (1) Empathy. Understand, from the inside, the research participant’s (client or therapist) lived experiencing • (2) Unconditional Positive Regard. Accept/prize the research participant’s experiencing, • (3) Genuineness. Be an authentic/equal partner with the research participant: participant = co-researcher; researcher = a fellow human being. • (4) Flexibility. Creatively and flexibly adapt research methods to the research topic and questions at hand

  35. Applying Person-centred principles to different types of research • Fairly easy to see application to qualitative research, e.g., • Clarifying expectations and other researcher pre-understandings; • Negotiating nature of participation with informant in a transparent, collaborative manner; • Carrying out data collection in a careful, intentional manner, including helping informant stay focused and clarifying their meanings; etc.

  36. Person-Centred Principles Apply Equally to Quantitative Research • Always put the participant’s needs ahead of yours • Treating participants disrespectfully and inconsistently leads to resentment and sloppy, invalid data • A questionnaire is a form of relationship

  37. Person-Centred Principles Apply Equally to Quantitative Research • A research participant will feel misunderstood and uncared for by a confusing questionnaire layout or an overly hot or noisy research room • An ill-prepared research packet or an anxious interviewer can betray a lack of genuine commitment by the researcher • All of our criticisms of quantitative research are really criticisms of bad research, of any kind

  38. 3. Focus on Change Process Research • Much current research on HPCE therapies does not focus on how change occurs • Needed as complement to outcome research & improve therapy • Select from different genres of change process research

  39. a. Important preliminary: Basic outcome research • What are the effects of HPCE therapies with specific client populations? • Can be quantitative or qualitative • Single client or group of clients • Standard questions or individualized • See Elliott & Zucconi (2006) for suggestions to implement in practice and training settings • Necessary starting point for Change Process research

  40. b. Process-Outcome Research • Quantitative genre: Measure process (e.g., empathy) => predict outcome • HPCE’s not studied enough with this approach: • Only 6 out of 47 studies in Bohart et al. (2002) empathy-outcome meta-analysis were HPCE therapies • Highly appropriate to naturalistic samples

  41. c. Helpful Factors Research • Qualitative genre: • Interview (e.g., Change Interview) • Helpful Aspects of Therapy (HAT) Form • Analyze with variety of methods, e.g., Grounded Theory, discourse analysis

  42. d. Micro-analytic Sequential Process Research • Examine turn-by-turn interaction between client and therapist • Quantitative: client and therapist process measures (e.g., client experiencing and therapist empathy) • Qualitative: Task analysis or Conversation analysis

  43. e. Complex Change Process Research Methods • Combine genres to develop richer picture • Balance strengths, limitations • Examples: • Assimilation Model (Stiles et al., 1990) • Task Analysis (Rice & Greenberg, 1984) • Comprehensive Process Analysis (Elliott, 1989) • Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design (Elliott, 2002)

  44. 4. Get Involved! • Elliott & Zucconi (2006): International Project on Psychotherapy and Psychotherapy Training (IPEPPT) • The project is to stimulate practice-based research, especial in training centres • Have developed a set of sample research protocols to choose form

  45. Further Suggestions (Elliott & Zucconi, 2006) • (1) Contribute to dialogues on how to measure therapy and training outcomes within HPCE therapies • (2) Set an example for students and colleagues by carrying out simple research procedures with your own clients and in your own training setting • (3) Help to develop specialized research protocols for particular client populations (e.g., people living with schizophrenia)

  46. Further Suggestions (Elliott & Zucconi, 2006) • (4) Contribute to method research aimed at improving existing quantitative and qualitative instruments • (5) Take part in more formal collaborations with similarly-inclined training centers to generate data for shared research

  47. Robert Elliott:fac0029@gmail.com • Blog: pe-eft.blogspot.com

More Related