Project Validation and Verification, Pitfalls 项目审定和核证及应注意的问题

1. Project Validation and Verification, Pitfalls项目审定和核证及应注意的问题 Susanne Haefeli-Hestvik

2. Content 提纲 • An efficient validation process • 高效的审定程序 • An efficient verification process • 高效的核证程序 • How big is the delivery/performance risk? • 交付和运行的风险 • What are the risks? • 风险在哪里？ • How to manage the risks? • 如何控制风险？

3. Content 提纲 • An efficient validation process • 高效的审定程序 • An efficient verification process • How big is the delivery/performance risk? • What are the risks? • How to manage the risks?

4. An Ideal Validation Timeline理想的审定时间表

5. A Realistic Validation timeline实际的审定时间表

6. QA/QC Validation Process current审定流程 Closing out of open issues MOC Assign DOE + HCA Tricorona CDM Comp 1-2 months PDD + Signed ERPA Site visit Draft Val R Final VR Sub Reg Registration Validation 2 days – 2 months Min: 102 days Time Frame 2 weeks 1-6 months 2-4 weeks 40 days Max: 324 days Project Owner Evidential Document

7. Validation Process ideal 理想的审定流程 Closing out of open issues MOC QA/QC Assign DOE + HCA Tricorona CDM Comp 1-2 months PDD + Signed ERPA PIN Site visit Final VR Sub Reg Registration Validation Draft Val R 2 days – 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks 1 month 2-4 weeks 40 days Goal: 115 days Evidential Document Project Owner Criteria  Argumentation  Evidence

8. Content 提纲 • An efficient validation process • An efficient verification process • 高效的核证程序 • How big is the delivery/performance risk? • What are the risks? • How to manage the risks?

9. The Actual Verification Work实际的核证工作 VERIFICATION FINDINGS核证中事实调查 • Consistency with monitoring methodology and monitoring plan 与监测计划和监测方法的一致性 • Factors used for project emission reduction calculations 项目减排量计算所考虑的参数 • Remaining Issues, CARs, FARs from Previous Validation or Verification 遗留问题，以往审定和核证中需要解决的 CARs，Fars • Completeness of Monitoring 监测的完整性 • Accuracy of Emission Reduction Calculations 减排量计算的准确性 • Management System and Quality Assurance 管理系统和质量保证 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT（认证报告）

10. Table 1 Data Management Systems表1数据管理系统

11. Table 2 Detailed Audit Testing of Risk Areas and Random Testing表2 在有风险的方面进行详细的审计测试和随机测试

12. Content 提纲 • An efficient validation process • An efficient verification process • How big is the delivery/performance risk? • 交付和运行的风险 • What are the risks? • How to manage the risks? March 06 3月6日 Sept 07 9月7日 All projects from the UNEP database with a crediting period starting before and up to March 06... ... should have issued something by now

13. WHR (ACM0004)

14. WHR (ACM0004)

15. Wind (Large)

16. Wind (Large)

17. Other methodologies其它方法学 • Wind small: 90 (75)%  50% • Hydro large: 91 (86)%  26% • Hydro small: 61 (86)%  61% • Biomass: 99 (89)%  71%

18. Content 提纲 • An efficient validation process • An efficient verification process • How big is the delivery/performance risk? • What are the risks? • 风险在哪里？ • How to manage the risks?

19. Verification – ideal process 理想的程序 Assign DOE + Evidential Documents Resolve outstanding issues Tricorona/ Partners Project Final Ver R + revised MR 1 year of generation Site visit Draft Ver R MR Time Frame 1 month 1-2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 2 weeks Goal: 110 days 5 days Publication of Request for Issuance CERs in Pending account UN

20. Verification – ideal process Assign DOE + Evidential Documents Resolve outstanding issues Tricorona/ Partners Project Final Ver R + revised MR 1 year of generation Site visit Draft Ver R MR Time Frame 1 month 1-2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 2 weeks Goal: 110 days 5 days Publication of Request for Issuance CERs in Pending account UN

21. Verification – ideal process Assign DOE + Evidential Documents Resolve outstanding issues Tricorona/ Partners Project Final Ver R + revised MR 1 year of generation Site visit Draft Ver R MR Time Frame 1 month 1-2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 2 weeks Goal: 110 days 5 days Publication of Request for Issuance CERs in Pending account UN

22. Verification – ideal process Assign DOE + Evidential Documents Resolve outstanding issues Tricorona/ Partners Project Final Ver R + revised MR 1 year of generation Site visit Draft Ver R MR Time Frame 1 month 1-2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 2 weeks Goal: 110 days 5 days Publication of Request for Issuance CERs in Pending account UN

23. Verification – ideal process Assign DOE + Evidential Documents Resolve outstanding issues Tricorona/ Partners Project Final Ver R + revised MR 1 year of generation Site visit Draft Ver R MR Time Frame 1 month 1-2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 2 weeks Goal: 110 days 5 days Publication of Request for Issuance CERs in Pending account UN

24. Verification – ideal process Assign DOE + Evidential Documents Resolve outstanding issues Tricorona/ Partners Project Final Ver R + revised MR 1 year of generation Site visit Draft Ver R MR Time Frame 1 month 1-2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 2 weeks Goal: 110 days 5 days Publication of Request for Issuance CERs in Pending account UN

25. Content 提纲 • An efficient validation process • An efficient verification process • How big is the delivery/performance risk? • What are the risks? • How to manage the risks? • 如何控制风险？

26. Conclusion 结论 • Have a strong partner, both financially and technically • 找一个财务和技术实力强的合作伙伴 • Pre-validation and initial verification • 预审定和初步核证 • Communication Communication Communication • 沟通沟通沟通 • susanne@tricorona.se