1 / 16

Efficient tracking of photospheric flows

BALLTRACKING. Efficient tracking of photospheric flows. H.E.Potts, D.A.Diver, R.K.Barrett University of Glasgow, UK Funded by PPARC Rolling Grant PPA/G/0/2001/00472. The Why and The How. Why? Investigate small scale interactions between magnetic elements and photosphere

aileen-rodriguez
Download Presentation

Efficient tracking of photospheric flows

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BALLTRACKING Efficient tracking of photospheric flows H.E.Potts, D.A.Diver, R.K.Barrett University of Glasgow, UK Funded by PPARC Rolling Grant PPA/G/0/2001/00472

  2. The Why and The How Why? • Investigate small scale interactions between magnetic elements and photosphere • Contribution to magnetic energy budget How? • Quite hard: • Typical diameter ~1 Mm • Granules only live for 5–15 mins • Typical supergranular velocity 500ms-1 , but much faster ‘random walk’ • Only advected ~0.5 Mm by supergranular flow in lifetime • Need lots of data! MDI continuum data

  3. Established Tracking Methods • Standard LCT (Simon 1988). • Excellent results but slow (approx 4 days for 8hrs MDI High Resolution data) • CST (Strous 1995) • Complex, and limited to high resolution images. Need to be careful about selection effects • Simulated data needed

  4. What will Solar-B give us? 10 – 20 times more data to process!

  5. Balltracking 1: Filtering and derotation Filtering: • Continuum data is dominated by p-mode oscillations • 2D Fourier filter applied to remove all but granulation information. No time filtering used Derotation • Minimal remapping – just rigid derotation. Any more sophisticated scaling done on processed data set • Much smaller dataset (eg. 6GB raw vs. 10MB processed) • Reduces interpolation errors • Done in Fourier space Both done in a single operation for speed

  6. Balltracking 1: Filtering and derotation Raw Image Filtered image 2D Fourier Transform Mask Phase adjust Inverse transform FILTER DEROTATE

  7. Balltracking 2 : Tracking • Surface made from smoothed granulation data • Massy ‘balls’ dropped onto the surface. • Balls ‘float’ on surface and settle to local minima • Balls are then pushed around by travelling granulation patterns • Balls removed if too close to each other • Damping force for stability

  8. Balltracking 3: Smoothing • Set of irregularly spaced ball trajectories • Smooth in space and time to get underlying velocity V(i,j): V(xi,yi,t): smoothed velocity s : spatial smoothing radius Dt : time smoothing interval rn,t : distance from (xi,yi) to ball

  9. How accurate is possible? • Random Velocity > Directed velocity • Estimate error in smoothed velocity: • But adjacent measurements are not independent: • Best possible, regardless of sampling frequency: RS ,TS: Smoothing lengths Dt, Dr : Sampling intervals sv, su, : STD of smoothed and random velocity

  10. How smooth is smooth enough

  11. Making Test data • Make uniform density array of randomly positioned cells • Assign a size and lifetime to each cell. • Specify velocity field v • Cell is advected by underlying velocity field, and repelled by surrounding cells • As a cells dies replace, with spatial frequency S : S : local cell replacement rate v : specified velocity field t : mean cell lifetime n0 : mean cell density

  12. Results from simulated granulation

  13. Real results - Supergranule evolution 4 hour average 2.5 × 2.5 arcmin Passive flow tracers

  14. Supergranular lanes • 36h Quiet sun • Granulation pattern found from velocity field using a lane finding algorithm • Note differential rotation

  15. Conclusions BALLTRACKING • Very efficient and robust tracking method • Accuracy close to the maximum possible • Useful for tracking any flow with features at a characteristic spatial scale • Fast enough for automated, real time analysis of large data sets

  16. Publications Balltracking method: • Potts HE, Barrett RK, Diver, DA Balltracking: An ultra efficient method for tracking photosperic flows. Submitted to A&A, November 2003 Interpolation errors in LCT: • Potts HE, Barrett R, Diver, DA Reduction of interpolation errors when using LCT for motion detection. Submitted to Solar Physics, June 2003

More Related