540 likes | 647 Views
Landing Pads. General, useful tool for all synthetic biologists A systematic, Biobrick-compatible approach to put plasmid constructs onto the chromosome. Fabrication. Modeling. Construct gene operons in plasmid form and assemble into the whole system. Characterize system
E N D
Landing Pads • General, useful tool for all synthetic biologists • A systematic, Biobrick-compatible • approach to put plasmid constructs onto the chromosome Fabrication Modeling • Construct gene operons in plasmid form and assemble into the whole system • Characterize system • Determine robustness • and predict ways to • improve performance Project Overview Divide-by two Circuit • Genetic toggle switch switchable by one input • Essential computing component Insert DBT constructs into landing pad and cross into chromosome
Divide-By-Two Circuit Idealized Divide-By-Two Circuit • The same input toggles the system between both states • (on and off) • Frequency of the output • is half of the frequency • of the input • Output can be any gene expression input Output (normalized) Time
DBT Circuit: Single Input Toggle Switch NR1 σ54 GFP lacp araB lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN LacI araBp RFP cl nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp nifA σ54
How It Works NR1 GFP lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp
How It Works NR1 σ54 GFP lacp araB lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp σ54
How It Works NR1 σ54 GFP lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN LacI araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp σ54
How It Works σ54 lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN LacI araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp σ54
How It Works lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN RFP araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp nifA
How It Works σ54 lacp araB lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN RFP araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp σ54 nifA
How It Works σ54 lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN RFP araBp cl nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp σ54 nifA
How It Works σ54 lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN araBp cl nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp σ54
How It Works NR1 GFP lacp lacl gfp glnG cI glnKp rpoN araBp nifHp cl nifA lacl rfp cIp
Basic ODE’s • Hill function and degradation • No Basal production
Steady State Analysis • Under which conditions will the system toggle and which conditions will it not? • If it can toggle, how “easy” is it to achieve this? • How robust is the system?
NR1 NR1 σ54 GFP GFP lacp lacp araB lacl lacl gfp gfp glnG glnG cI cI glnKp glnKp rpoN rpoN LacI LacI araBp araBp RFP RFP cl cl nifHp nifHp cl cl nifA nifA lacl lacl rfp rfp cIp cIp nifA nifA σ54 Reducing Variable Dimensions
Steady State Equations • Two variables and 8 parameters • Generally the parameters are either unknown and/or vary over a range • Symmetric vs unsymmetric
Existence of Multiple Steady States NO INPUT 3 steady states: 2 stable, 1 unstable 1 steady state: stable Phase plane: three steady states Phase plane: one steady state cI lacI
Toggle System Needs Two Steady States With INPUT Two stable steady states: toggle possible Single steady state: no toggle can happen Input added: toggle between two states Input added: no toggle GFP cI RFP lacI
What Parameter Ranges Yield Toggle Activity? • Only a narrow range of parameter values give toggle behavior • How robust is the system? • Not very • This will be addressed later
So how do you toggle? Vary parameters assuming… Toggle possible No toggle possible • How does input affect the system? • Is a toggle easily achieved?
System responds differently to varying input levels Sufficient input Low input Excess input Ideal! Steady state 1 Response of lacI and cI: excess input Response of lacI and cI: sufficient input Response of lacI and cI: insufficient input Transient response concentration Quasi-steady state Quasi- Steady state Steady state 1 Steady state 2 bifurcation ??? time
The Nature of Quasi-Steady State Back to original steady states Original system: Two stable steady states ONE quasi- Steady state Output 1 Output 1 Output 2 Output 2 High s54 level Excess input added S54 degrades
Quasi-Steady State Heavily Favors One Output End: Output 1 Start: Output 1 Start: Output 2 NOT TOGGLE BEHAVIOR!!! Output 1 Output 1 Output 2 Output 2 High s54 level Excess input added S54 degrades
Dynamic Modeling of the DBT • State transition takes place • “Overthrowing” side: • Rapidly increases • Dips back down • Slowly rises to dominant level lacI Concentration (molecules) cI Time (s)
Dynamic Modeling of the DBT lacI Concentration cI Time
Potential Problem Spots A: Input promoter must be very quiet B: Cross-talk between the two values must be low C:lacp and cIp side parameter values must be relatively close C B A
Unbalanced, Gardner-based Simulations: lacI: (blue) cI: (gold) rfp: (red) gfp: (green) • Large difference in the parameters between sides • Device predicted to tend to have lac-dominant side more stable • Can switch into lac-dominant side, but can’t switch out Concentration (molecules) Time (s) lacI: (blue) cI: (gold) rfp: (red) gfp: (green) Concentration (molecules) Time (s)
Stochastic Modeling • Mass-Action Model and Gillespie Method
Tuning the Device with IPTG and Temperature • Attenuate Lac with IPTG • Attenuate cI with heat • Calibrate device by varying both IPTG and temperature • Current research focusing on if and where “sweet-spot” is located
Clamping the DBT • Regardless of input pulse length/decay rate, only one change-of-states occurs
Operons of the DBT Circuit • Initial construction requires five plasmids, each carrying one operon of the circuit • Our final design will have fewer plasmids, as we will place some on the chromosome and combine others
cIp-nifA-lacI-RFP BBa_I720004 BBa_I720005
lacp-GFP-glnG-cI (cont) • Sequencing and characterization failed • BioBrick had bad DNA (wrong lacp sequence) • Actually needed repressible, rather than constitutive, promoter • Sequencing results verified plasmid had all the genes, though BBa_I720006
BBa_I720002 PCR: NCM 77 BBa_I720003 PCR: K. Pneumoniae genome
Characterization: transformed plasmid into rpoN mutants: growth regardless of arabinose input Also transformed rpoN alone: still have growth Too noisy; need a single copy Back-up plan: tetO-rpoN BBa_I720000 BBa_I720001
DBT Operons in Landing Pads BBa_I720007
BioBrick Landing Pad Built so that ANYONE can insert ANY BioBrick onto the Chromosome of E. Coli!
BioBrick Landing Pad: Goals of Project • General Landing Pad Goal: Aid in insertion of constructs onto the chromosome • Develop a general method for constructing landing pads that: • Have BioBrick compatible restriction sites • Allow easy phenotypic screening • Limit noise • Allow nesting of sequential landing pads
BioBrick Landing Pad: Homologous Regions Arabinose Homologous Regions Homologous Recombination of Arabinose Landing Pad
BioBrick Landing Pad: Nesting Landing Pads • Benefits of Nested Landing Pads • Allow for more constructs to be inserted onto the chromosome at the same chromosomal location • Different drug resistance gene is used: Only one type of screening is required
BioBrick Landing Pad: Nesting Landing Pads • New Landing Pad Criteria • Homologous regions from previous drug resistance gene (ChlorR) • Different drug resistance gene (KanR)
BioBrick Landing Pad: Nested Landing Pads Nested Product: Chloramphenicol Landing Pad nested in Arabinose Landing Pad
BioBrick Landing Pad: Fabrication Progress * Nesting to be tried in the near future as well!