150 likes | 239 Views
Making it on a dime: How the experiences of low income students can inform our work. Ohio College Personnel Association Annual Meeting February 3, 2006 Anne M. Hornak, Ph.D. University of Toledo & Natalie Jackson University of Toledo. Presentation Overview. Current state of affairs
E N D
Making it on a dime: How the experiences of low income students can inform our work Ohio College Personnel Association Annual Meeting February 3, 2006 Anne M. Hornak, Ph.D. University of Toledo & Natalie Jackson University of Toledo
Presentation Overview • Current state of affairs • Study design and overview • Need for the study • What are professionals saying • What are the needs on your campus • Small group activity • Large group processing • Next steps & conclusion
Current State of Affairs • 84% of the nation believe cost of college is too expensive (Jobs for the Future, 2003) • From 1981 to 1994 the average cost of tuition increased 153% and the median family income only increased by 75% (Kadison & DiGeronimo, 2004)
Current state cont. • In 1990 – 54% of full time students received some form of financial aid – by 2000 this increased to 71% • 76% of students reported working an average of 22 hours per week (Choy, 2004) – Terenzini & Pascarella (2005) study shows that academic success and persistence to graduation is reduced greatly by every hour beyond 15 students work per week
Current state cont. • Grant aid is still available through the federal government, but loans have become the dominant form of aid since the 1980’s (Orfield, 2002) • Census data shows a 16% increase in the number of eligible traditional age college students between 2000-2015 - will impact resources on campus and strain a federal loan aid system in need of an overhaul
Current state cont. • Impetus for current study • Need for current study • Implications of current study
Study design & overview • Mixed Method Study • Quantitative data • BPS • NPSAS • Surveys • Qualitative data • Focus group interviews • Internet Blog journals • Interviews with key administrators
Study design cont. • Six institutions in three states • Institutions • The Ohio State University (40.8%)* • Kent State University (29.6%)* • Michigan State University (28.6%)* • University of Michigan (24.7%)* • Indiana University (33.4%)* • Indiana University Purdue University – Indianapolis (32.9%)* *% change in tuition and fees from 2000-2001 to 2005-2006
Study design cont. • 3 states selected - Michigan, Ohio, Indiana – all rust belt with strong reliance on manufacturing • Tuition increases – Michigan (up 12%) was 3rd highest in the US – Ohio and Indiana 6% and 5% respectively, fell in the middle (College Board, 2005)
Study design cont. • Students selected based on family contribution data, amount of financial aid, and feelings about own ability to pay for tuition and college living • Focus groups will be held once per semester, twice a year • Participants will be required to journal weekly on Internet Blog site • Longitudinal study – pending support
Need for the study • What are the needs of your students? • Have you noticed increased stress over financial issues with your students? • In what context (academic, time management, inability to pay bills)? • What resources are available or referrals have you made to a student struggling financially? • Can programming assist these students or is increased monetary aid the only real answer? • How can we best design programs to assist these students? • Where should such programming be based (e.g., TRIO, Counseling Center, Wellness Center, Financial Aid Office?) • How do we reach these students who may spend limited time on campus?
Small group activity • Your office is just awarded a small grant to work with low income students. You must use a small percentage for administrative costs, but the remainder is can be used however the office thinks it will best serve students. In a small group think about how best to use the remainder of the money. • What do your students need? • What would best fulfill the mission of your office, campus, and larger community?
References • Choy, S. (2004). Paying for college: Changes between 1990 and 2002 for full-time dependent students. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. • The College Board. (2005). Trends in College Pricing: 2004. Washington, DC: The College Entrance Examination Board. • Kadison & DiGeronimo, (2004). College of the overwhelmed: The campus health crisis and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Orfield, G. (2002). Foreword. In D.E. Heller and P. Marin (eds.) Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. The Civil Rights Projects, Harvard University. Retrieved September 1, 2003, from http://www.law.harvard.edu/civilrights, xi-xii. • Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research, volume 2. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.