140 likes | 281 Views
Internet Sales How to Regulate Your Distribution Network. Edward Miller emiller@reedsmith.com +44 20 3116 3470. Pierre Fabre ECJ Decision C-439/09 - 3.10.11. Key Legal Sources. Vertical Restraints Block Exemption 330/2010/EU. European Commission Guidelines 2010/C 130/01.
E N D
Internet SalesHow to Regulate Your Distribution Network Edward Miller emiller@reedsmith.com +44 20 3116 3470
Pierre Fabre ECJ Decision C-439/09 - 3.10.11 Key Legal Sources Vertical Restraints Block Exemption 330/2010/EU European Commission Guidelines 2010/C 130/01 Internet Distribution Strategy
Regulating the Distributor’s Use of the Internet Required bricks & mortar sales Restricting “active” and “passive” sales Required quality standards Non Uniform Pricing? Use of maximum order requirements Use of Supplier’s IP
“Active” and “Passive” Sales • May restrict active sales made into the territory of another exclusively distributor or reserved exclusively to the supplier (VRBE, art 4(b)(i)) • “In principle, every distributor must be allowed to use the internet to sell products. In general, where a distributor uses a website to sell products that is considered a form of passive selling …” (Guidelines, para 52)
Bricks and Mortar • “… supplier [may] requir[e], without limiting the online sales of the distributor, that the buyer sells at least a certain absolute amount (in value or volume) of the products offline to ensure an efficient operation of its brick and mortar shop …” (Guidelines, para 52(c)) • But – cannot restrict proportion of on-line sales • Not only selective distribution
Quality standards • “… the supplier may require quality standards for the use of the internet site to resell its goods, just as the supplier may require quality standards for a shop or for selling by catalogue or for advertising and promotion in general.” (Guidelines, para 54) • Can restrict use of “third party platforms” • Seemingly not only selective distribution
Maximum Order Requirements • “… in order to prevent sales to unauthorised dealers, a supplier can restrict its selected dealers from selling more than a given quantity of contract products to an individual end user. Such a requirement may have to be stricter for online sales if it is easier for an unauthorised dealer to obtain those products by using the internet.” (Guidelines, para 56)” • Selective distribution only
Non-uniform Pricing • Supplier may agree a fixed fee to support offline sales (Guidelines, para 52(d)) • Variable fee considered to amount “indirectly to dual pricing”
Supplier’s IP • Obligation to licence images etc for on-line sales?? • Imposition of a royalty – variable or fixed??
Outside the VRBE – Pierre Fabre • European Court of Justice does leave open the possibility that an individual exemption under Article 101(3) might be available for an absolute ban on internet sales in a selective distribution agreement. • Court gives no indication of the circumstances in which such an exemption might be available. • Such an exemption is not given under Article 4(c) of the Vertical Restraints Block Exemption (exemption for ban on selling contract products in a selective distribution agreement from an unauthorised location) • Maintenance of a prestigious brand image cannot constitute a legitimate reason for restricting competition. • Need to provide advice to the consumer has not been accepted as justification for a ban on Internet sales in the context of non-prescription drugs and contact lenses.
Important to maintain integrity of selective distribution networks Leclerc (YSL) T-19/92 Non-dominant suppliers can refuse to supply – but take care! Bayer (C-2/01P C-3/01P 6.1.04) Consequences Difficult to maintain pricing differentials