360 likes | 622 Views
Alternative Lotka-Volterra competition. Absolute competition coefficients dN i / N i dt = r i [1 – b ii N i - b ij N j ]. equivalent to: dN i / N i dt = r i [ K i - N i - a j N j ] / K i = r i [ K i / K i - N i / K i - a j N j / K i ]
E N D
Alternative Lotka-Volterra competition • Absolute competition coefficients dNi/ Nidt= ri[1 – bii Ni - bijNj] equivalent to: dNi/ Nidt= ri[Ki - Ni - ajNj] / Ki = ri[Ki/Ki - Ni/Ki - ajNj/Ki] = ri[1-(1/Ki)Ni – (aj/Ki)Nj]
1/b12 Stable coexistence dN1 / N1dt = 0 1/b22 dN2 / N2dt = 0 0 1/b11 1/b21 N1 Absolute Lotka-Volterra N2
Competitive effect vs. response • Effect: impact of density of a species • Self density (e.g., b11) • Other species density (e.g., b21) • Response: how density affects a species • Self density (e.g., b11) • Other species’ density (e.g., b12) • Theory: effects differ (b11 > b21) • Experiments: responses (b11, b12)
1/b12 Stable coexistence dN1 / N1dt = 0 1/b22 dN2 / N2dt = 0 0 N1 1/b11 1/b21 Absolute Lotka-Volterra N2
Not ecological models • No mechanisms of competition in the model • Phenomenological • Environment not explicitly included • Mechanistic models of Resource competition
Resources • component of the environment • availability increases population growth • can be depleted or used up by organisms • A resource is limiting if it determines the growth rate of the population • Liebig’s law: resource in shortest supply determines growth
R* dN / N dt < 0 dN / N dt > 0 R 0 dN / N dt = 0 Resources for 0 growth
Kinds of resources • Consider 2 potentially limiting resources • Illustrate zero growth isocline graphically • Defines 8 types • 3 types important • substitutable • essential • switching
Zero growth isocline R2 dN / N dt > 0 dN / N dt < 0 R1 Substitutable resources: Interchangeable Prey for most animals
Zero growth isocline R2 dN / N dt > 0 dN / N dt < 0 R1 Switching resources: One at a time Nutritionally substitutable Constraints on consumption
R2 Zero growth isocline dN / N dt > 0 dN / N dt < 0 R1 Essential resources: both required Soil nutrients for plants
Modeling resource-based population growth • dN / N dt = p F - m • F = feeding rate on the resource • m = mortality rate (independent of R ) • p = constant relating feeding to population growth • F = FmaxR / [K1/2 + R ] • Fmax = maximal feeding rate • K1/2 = resource level for 1/2 maximal feeding • 1/2 saturation constant
Fmax F R K1/2 Feeding rate • Holling type 2 Functional response • Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics • Monod microbial growth
Modeling resource-based population growth • dN / N dt = p FmaxR / [K1/2 + R ] - m • resource dynamics • dR / dt = a ( S - R ) - (dN / dt + mN ) c • S = maximum resource supplied to the system • a = a rate constant • c = resource consumption / individual • N = 0 if S = R then dR / dt = 0
Equilibrium • dN / N dt = 0 and dR / dt = 0 • resource consumption just balances resource renewal • growth due to resource consumption just balances mortality • Equilibrium resource density: • R* = K1/2m / [ pFmax - m ]
dN / N dt R* 0 R -m Limitation by 1 resource
Conclusion • 1 species feeding on 1 limiting resource • reduces that resource to a characteristic equilibrium value R* • R* determined by functional response and mortality • increases as K1/2 increases • increases as m increases • decreases as p or Fmax increase
Two consumers competing for one resource • dNi / Ni dt = pi Fmax iR / [K1/2 i + R ] - mi • dR / dt = a ( S - R ) - S(dNi / dt + miNi) ci • each species has its own R* [ R*1 and R*2]
dN / N dt sp. 1 sp. 2 R*1 0 R R*2 -m2 -m1 Competition for 1 resource
R N sp. 1 SP.2 R R*2 R*1 t Dynamics of competition for 1 resource
Prediction for 2 species competing for 1 resource • The species with the lowerR* will eliminate the other in competition • Independent of initial numbers • Coexistence not possible • unless R*1 = R*2 • R*rule
Competitive exclusion principle • Two species in continued, direct competition for 1 limiting resource cannot coexist • Focus on mechanism • Coexistence (implicitly) requires 2 independently renewed resources
Experiments • Laboratory tests confirm this prediction • Primarily done with phytoplankton • Summarized by Tilman (1982) Grover (1997) • Morin, pp. 40-49 • Chase & Leibold, pp. 62-63
R2 Ci1 Ci2 Ci R1 Consumption of 2 resources consumption vector: resultant of consumption of each resource consumes more R1
R2 Ci1 Ci2 C1 R1 Essential resources consumption vectors are parallel (essential)
R2 Ci1 Ci2 Ci R1 Substitutable resources consumption vectors are not parallel (substitutable)
R2 C1 R1 Switching resources consumption vectors are perpendicular to isocline (switching)
S1,S2 R2 U R1 Renewal for 2 resources supply vector: points at supply point S1,S2
S1,S2 R2 U U Ci Ci Ci U R1 Equilibrium: 1 sp. 2 resources consumption vector equal & opposite supply vector
Equilibrium • Equilibrium (R1,R2) falls on isocline • therefore, dN / N dt =0 • U and C vectors equal in magnitude, opposite direction • therefore dR1 / dt = 0 and dR2 / dt = 0
S1,S2 S1,S2 S1,S2 R2 sp. 2 sp. 1 R1 Competition for 2 resources sp. 1 always excludes sp. 2 sp. 2 cannot survive neither spp. can survive
S1,S2 S1,S2 S1,S2 S1,S2 R2 sp. 2 sp. 2 sp. 1 sp. 1 R1 Competition for 2 resources neither spp. can survive sp. 2 cannot survive sp. 1 always excludes sp. 2 coexistence
Equilibrium • sp. 1 • needs less R1(limited by R2) • consumes more R2 • sp. 2 • needs less R2(limited by R1) • consumes more R1 • consumes more of the resource limiting to itself