1 / 19

State of the Pan SPM User Group 19 March 2014 Andrew Morgan & Michael Ng

State of the Pan SPM User Group 19 March 2014 Andrew Morgan & Michael Ng. State of the Pan. Condition survey of public toilet facilities in the Auckland region Also to gain understanding of the quantum, condition and location of public toilets. Outcome Desired.

aine
Download Presentation

State of the Pan SPM User Group 19 March 2014 Andrew Morgan & Michael Ng

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State of the Pan SPM User Group19 March 2014 Andrew Morgan & Michael Ng

  2. State of the Pan Condition survey of public toilet facilities in the Auckland region Also to gain understanding of the quantum, condition and location of public toilets

  3. Outcome Desired • understand the dynamics of the asset base • plan for the maintenance and renewals - for funding and investment decisions • Inform our planning practices by providing reliable base information

  4. Survey Overview • 650 facilities • 4 months to survey • 13,000 components • Surveyors used SPM Mobile on Samsung tablets • GPS on the spot (using tablets) • Sketch of each toilet (floor plan) • Property Quality Survey (PQS) survey • Photos • $36M (GRC) and $104M (CRV)

  5. Survey Output • Property information • Location (GIS), management, function • Condition data & Condition Grade Index (CGI) • Lifecycle forecasts • Photos • Surveyor comments • PQS (Star rating based on 30 questions) • Valuation • Gross Replacement Cost (GRC) total of all surveyed components • Added estimated Capital Replacement Value (CRV)

  6. Spatial View [http://easysolutions.co.nz/toilets2013]

  7. The Good, Bad and Ugly!

  8. Issues for us • Lifecycle analysis are based purely on condition. In reality, performance and perception driver • Political Decision Making- 21 local boards (region wide vs local needs) • Renewal Strategy • Still not customer focused, but departmental

  9. Issues – Condition Results With so little in Poor and Very poor, not much $ are showing in lifecycle analysis. Q: Is this a true reflection of reality?

  10. Lifecycle Renewals • For over 700 facilities- seems low

  11. Realistic Renewal Programme?

  12. Lifecycle Analysis versus Renewals

  13. Lifecycle Analysis versus Renewals Lifecycle outputs will only consider this

  14. Analysing Performance - PQS

  15. Comparing Performance – PQS

  16. Renewal Strategy

  17. Consolidating the Scores Age-based score + CGI (condition) + PQS (performance)

  18. Resulting Programme

  19. Lessons • Data collection- consider how you want to report and outcome • Data analysis- consider holistic approach. Condition is only one piece of the jigsaw. • Asset knowledge- The more you analyse your data. The more you understand about your assets.

More Related