950 likes | 1.29k Views
Standards Charge. . Common Core State Standards. Fewer Clearer Higher . Common Core Standards Criteria. RigorousClear and specificTeachable and learnableMeasurableCoherentGrade by grade standardsInternationally benchmarked. 44 States DC Have Adopted the Common Core State Standards. *Minnes
E N D
1. So, What’s New in the Common Core State Standards?
Susan A Gendron
Senior Fellow
International Center for Leadership in Education
June 2011
2. Standards Charge Create the next generation of K-12 standards
All students college and career ready in literacy and mathematics
No later than end of high school
Build upon the foundation laid by the states
Create a vision of what it means to be a literate student in the twenty-first century
Students who readily undertake the close, attentive reading that is the heart of understanding and enjoying complex works of literature.
Habitually perform the critical reading necessary to pick carefully through the staggering amount of information
They actively seek wide, deep and thoughtful engagement with high-quality literary and informational text that builds knowledge, enlarges experiences and broadens worldviews.
They demonstrate cogent reasoning and use evidence that is essential for deliberations and responsible citizenship
Create the next generation of K-12 standards
All students college and career ready in literacy and mathematics
No later than end of high school
Build upon the foundation laid by the states
Create a vision of what it means to be a literate student in the twenty-first century
Students who readily undertake the close, attentive reading that is the heart of understanding and enjoying complex works of literature.
Habitually perform the critical reading necessary to pick carefully through the staggering amount of information
They actively seek wide, deep and thoughtful engagement with high-quality literary and informational text that builds knowledge, enlarges experiences and broadens worldviews.
They demonstrate cogent reasoning and use evidence that is essential for deliberations and responsible citizenship
3. Common Core State Standards
4. Common Core Standards Criteria Rigorous
Clear and specific
Teachable and learnable
Measurable
Coherent
Grade by grade standards
Internationally benchmarked Rigor high-level cognitive demands by asking students to demonstrate deep conceptual understanding through the application of content knowledge and skills to new situations.
sufficient guidance and clarity so that they are teachable, learnable, and measurable.
Teachable and learnable: Provide sufficient guidance for the design of curricula and instructional materials. The standards must be reasonable in scope, instructionally manageable, and promote depth of understanding.
The standards will not prescribe how they are taught and learned but will allow teachers flexibility to teach and students to learn in various instructionally relevant contexts.
Measureable: Student attainment of the standards should be observable and verifiable and the standards can be used to develop broader assessment frameworks
Coherent: The standards should convey a unified vision of the big ideas and supporting concepts within a discipline and reflect a progression of learning that is meaningful and appropriate.
Grade-by-grade standards: The standards will have limited repetition across the grades or grade spans to help educators align instruction to the standards.
Internationally benchmarked: The standards will be informed by the content, rigor, and organization of standards of high-performing countries so that all students are prepared for succeeding in our global economy and society.
Rigor high-level cognitive demands by asking students to demonstrate deep conceptual understanding through the application of content knowledge and skills to new situations.
sufficient guidance and clarity so that they are teachable, learnable, and measurable.
Teachable and learnable: Provide sufficient guidance for the design of curricula and instructional materials. The standards must be reasonable in scope, instructionally manageable, and promote depth of understanding.
The standards will not prescribe how they are taught and learned but will allow teachers flexibility to teach and students to learn in various instructionally relevant contexts.
Measureable: Student attainment of the standards should be observable and verifiable and the standards can be used to develop broader assessment frameworks
Coherent: The standards should convey a unified vision of the big ideas and supporting concepts within a discipline and reflect a progression of learning that is meaningful and appropriate.
Grade-by-grade standards: The standards will have limited repetition across the grades or grade spans to help educators align instruction to the standards.
Internationally benchmarked: The standards will be informed by the content, rigor, and organization of standards of high-performing countries so that all students are prepared for succeeding in our global economy and society.
5. 44 States + DC Have Adopted the Common Core State Standards *Minnesota adopted the CCSS in ELA only
6. STANDARDS FOR
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
&
LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES,
SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS
JUNE 2010
7. www.corestandards.org
8. Design and Organization Three main sections
K-5 (cross-disciplinary)
6-12 English Language Arts
6-12 Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
9. Design and Organization Three appendices
A: Research and evidence; glossary of key terms
B: Reading text exemplars; sample performance tasks
C: Annotated student writing samples
10. Design and Organization
Shared responsibilities for students’ literacy development
11. Design and Organization
Focus on results rather than means Focus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpfulFocus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpful
12. Design and Organization
An integrated model of literacy Focus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpfulFocus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpful
13. Design and Organization
Media skills blended throughout Focus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpfulFocus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpful
14. Design and Organization K-12 standards
Grade-specific end-of-year expectations
Developmentally appropriate, cumulative progression of skills and understandings
One-to-one correspondence with College Career Anchor standards
15. Design and Organization Four strands:
Reading (including Reading Foundational Skills)
Writing
Speaking and Listening
Language Focus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpfulFocus on achievement leaves room for teachers, curriculum developers and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be taught
Teachers are free to provide students with what ever tools their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpful
16. Reading Design and Organization
Three sections:
1. Literature
2. Informational Text
3. Foundational Skills (K-5) Literature: students gain adequate exposure to a range of texts and tasks. Rigor is also infused through the requirement that students read increasingly complex texts through the grades. Students advancing through the grades are expected to meet each year’s grade-specific standards and retain or further develop skills and understandings mastered in preceding grades.Literature: students gain adequate exposure to a range of texts and tasks. Rigor is also infused through the requirement that students read increasingly complex texts through the grades. Students advancing through the grades are expected to meet each year’s grade-specific standards and retain or further develop skills and understandings mastered in preceding grades.
17. Literary/Informational Text
18. Reading Framework for NAEP 2009 Standards demand a greater focus on informational text literary non fiction
Major focus in 6-12
Standards demand a greater focus on informational text literary non fiction
Major focus in 6-12
19. College and Career Readiness Standards for Reading Key Ideas and Details
1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.
3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.
20. College and Career Readiness Standards for Reading Craft and Structure
4. Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone.
5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole.
6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
21. College and Career Readiness Standards for Reading
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words.
*8. Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take. Informational textInformational text
22. College and Career Readiness Standards for Reading
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
10 .Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
23. 23 Best measured by an attentive reader
Ability to make an informed decision about the difficulty of a text
Knowledge of four factors in developing effective tools:
Levels of Meaning or Purpose
Reader and Task: Determining whether a given text is appropriate for the student:
Cognitive abilities
Motivation
Topic knowledge
Linguistic and discourse knowledge
Comprehension strategies
Experiences
“Reading for Understanding, 2002, The RAND Reading Study group”
Quantitative:Word length or frequency (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level text, Dale-Chall Readability Formula, Lexile)
Sentence length
Text cohesion (University of Memphis, Coh-Metrix)
Measurement tools ( Lexile example
Structure
Language Conventionality & Clarity
Knowledge Demands
Best measured by an attentive reader
Ability to make an informed decision about the difficulty of a text
Knowledge of four factors in developing effective tools:
Levels of Meaning or Purpose
Reader and Task: Determining whether a given text is appropriate for the student:
Cognitive abilities
Motivation
Topic knowledge
Linguistic and discourse knowledge
Comprehension strategies
Experiences
“Reading for Understanding, 2002, The RAND Reading Study group”
Quantitative:Word length or frequency (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level text, Dale-Chall Readability Formula, Lexile)
Sentence length
Text cohesion (University of Memphis, Coh-Metrix)
Measurement tools ( Lexile example
Structure
Language Conventionality & Clarity
Knowledge Demands
24. Qualitative Measure Levels of Meaning (literary texts) or Purpose (informational texts)
Structure
Language Conventionality and Clarity
Knowledge Demands: Life Experiences (literary texts)
Knowledge Demands: Cultural/Literary Knowledge (chiefly literary texts)
Knowledge Demands: Content/Discipline Knowledge (chiefly informational texts) Page 6 sheetPage 6 sheet
25. Quantitative Measures Readability tools: (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level test, Lexile Framework for Reading, Dale-Chall)
Use multiple tools
26. Text Complexity Grade Bands and Associated Lexile Ranges Metametrics has realigned its Lexile ranges to match the Standards’ text complexity grade bands and has adjusted upward its trajectory of reading comprehension development through the grades Metametrics has realigned its Lexile ranges to match the Standards’ text complexity grade bands and has adjusted upward its trajectory of reading comprehension development through the grades
27. Lexile Analyzerhttp://www.lexile.com/analyzer/
28. Grade 4 Informational textGrade 4 Informational text
29. Grade 4 Informational
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
8 Explain how an author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points in a text.
30. Performance Task
Students explain how Melvin Berger uses reasons and evidence in his book Discovering Mars: The Amazing Story of the Red Planet to support particular points regarding the topology of the planet. [RI.4.8]
31. Grade 7 Informational TextGrade 7 Informational Text
32. Grade 7 Informational Craft and Structure
4. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the impact of a specific word choice on meaning and tone.
33. Performance Task Students determine the figurative and connotative meanings of words such as wayfaring, laconic, and taciturnity as well as of phrases such as hold his peace in John Steinbeck’s Travels with Charley: In Search of America. They analyze how Steinbeck’s specific word choices and diction impact the meaning and tone of his writing and the characterization of the individuals and places he describes. [RI.7.4] Grade SevenGrade Seven
34. College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Text Types and Purposes
Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective techniques, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.
35. NAEP 2011 Writing Framework
36. K- argument, The writer of this piece•tells the reader the name of the book (in the title of the paper). oMy fabit (favorite) Book is do you Want to be my FRIEND•states an opinion or preference about the book. o. . . my fait (favorite) pot (part) is the hos (horse)K- argument, The writer of this piece•tells the reader the name of the book (in the title of the paper). oMy fabit (favorite) Book is do you Want to be my FRIEND•states an opinion or preference about the book. o. . . my fait (favorite) pot (part) is the hos (horse)
37. Grade 2 ArgumentGrade 2 Argument
38. Grade 2 ArgumentGrade 2 Argument
39. Grade 4 argumantGrade 4 argumant
44. Grade 8 Informative/Explanatory introduces the topic clearly, previewing what is to follow.The writer provides a brief summary of the plot iGrade 8 Informative/Explanatory introduces the topic clearly, previewing what is to follow.The writer provides a brief summary of the plot i
45. Two key elements of the quotation (destroyed but not defeated) help establish theoverall structure of the piece.oThe second, third, and fourth paragraphs each recount extended examples of Santiago’s struggle and determination (e.g., . . . Santiago has gone eighty-four days straight without catching a fish. young Manolin’s parents will no longer allow the two to fish together, for they do not want their son being exposed any more to this type of failure . . . but Santiago does not let the loss of his friend or the defeat that others see him suffering keep him off the sea. Rather, with bright and shining eyes he thinks “maybe today. Every day is a new day”.Two key elements of the quotation (destroyed but not defeated) help establish theoverall structure of the piece.oThe second, third, and fourth paragraphs each recount extended examples of Santiago’s struggle and determination (e.g., . . . Santiago has gone eighty-four days straight without catching a fish. young Manolin’s parents will no longer allow the two to fish together, for they do not want their son being exposed any more to this type of failure . . . but Santiago does not let the loss of his friend or the defeat that others see him suffering keep him off the sea. Rather, with bright and shining eyes he thinks “maybe today. Every day is a new day”.
48. College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Production and Distribution of Writing
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach.
Use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing and to interact and collaborate with others.
49. College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Research to Build and Present Knowledge
Conduct short, as well as more sustained research projects based on questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism.
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
50. Example/ Science Technical Sample Task A: Evaluating Evidence
Compare what the latest science tells us about Genetically Modified food against the arguments for and against Genetically Modified food. Evaluate the hypotheses, data, analysis, conclusions of each side, and including determining the extent to which each side in the debate relied on the available science, argues from an economical perspective, or appeals to the political and emotional concerns. Verify the data and either support or challenge the conclusions with other sources of information.
CCSS 11-12 RST.8
Source: Achieve
51. Example/ Science Technical Sample B – Making a claim
Read and view different examples of case-making materials related to GM food. Take a position and cite specific textual evidence from your sources, attending to important distinctions each authors makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account. Defend your conclusion from counter-claims Create a presentation of your analysis that highlights key evidence and your strongest claims.
CCSS 11-12 RST 1. and RST 9.
Source: Achieve
52. College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Range of Writing
Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.
53. College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Speaking and Listening
Comprehension and Collaboration
1. Range of conversations and collaborations, diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
2. Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally.
3. Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric.
54. College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Speaking and Listening
Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas
4. Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
5. Make strategic use of digital media and visual displays of data to express information and enhance understanding of presentations.
6. Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and communicative tasks, demonstrating command of formal English when indicated or appropriate.
55. College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Language Conventions of Standard English
When writing or speaking.
Use capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing.
Knowledge of Language
To comprehend more fully when reading or listening.
Vocabulary Acquisition and Use
4. Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases by using context clues, analyzing meaningful word parts,
5. Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in word meanings
6. Acquire and use accurately a range of general academic and domain-specific words
56. Building Analytic Thinking Skills Word “analysis” appears 57 times in the CCSS with 77 mentions of associated analysis words such as “compare and contrast”
Analysis – precursor to high level thinking
Lin Kuzmich
Stretch Learning Handbook
57. Analytic Thinking Process What is the purpose of this material?
What is a key question that is addressed or needs to be addressed?
What is the most important information?
What are the main inferences that can be made?
What are the key ideas or concepts?
58. Analytic Thinking Process What are the assumptions the author(s) made in this information, issue, or source
What are the implications of this information?
What is the main point of view that is presented?
Paul,R. and Elder, L. (2003) Analytic Thinking Foundation for Critical Thinking Press (page 23)
59. Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects
60. STANDARDS FOR
MATHEMATICS
JUNE 2010
61. Characteristics Fewer and more rigorous.
Aligned with college and career expectations – prepare all students for success upon graduating from high school.
Internationally benchmarked, so that all students are prepared for succeeding in our global economy and society.
Includes rigorous content and application of higher-order skills.
Builds upon strengths and lessons of current state standards.
Research based
62. Coherence Articulated progressions of topics and performances that are developmental and connected to other progressions
Conceptual understanding and procedural skills emphasized equally
NCTM states coherence also means that instruction, assessment, and curriculum are aligned
63. Focus Key ideas, understandings, and skills are identified
Deep learning of concepts is stressed
That is, time is spent on a topic and on learning it well. This counters the “mile wide, inch deep” criticism leveled at most current U.S. standards.
64. Clarity and Specificity Skills and concepts are clearly defined
Being able to apply concepts and skills to new situations is expected
66. Mathematics/Standards for Mathematical Practice
Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them
Reason abstractly and quantitatively
Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others
Model with mathematics
Use appropriate tools strategically
Attend to precision
Look for and make use of structure
Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning 1.Analyze givens, constraints, relationships and goals1.Analyze givens, constraints, relationships and goals
67. Grade Level Overview All K-8 have critical areas – areas that should be emphasized and require more time at the given grade level. This aligns exactly with CFPAll K-8 have critical areas – areas that should be emphasized and require more time at the given grade level. This aligns exactly with CFP
68. Format of K-8 Standards The letters 1.0A separate domainsThe letters 1.0A separate domains
69. Format of K-8 Standards
70. Cognitively-Guided Instruction Process
72. Kindergarten
76. Common Addition and Subtraction Situations
77. Common addition and subtraction situations
78. Compare Addition and Subtraction situations
79. Common multiplication and division situations
80. Common multiplication and division situations
81. Grade 6-8
Ratios and Proportional Relationships (6-7)
Number Systems
Expressions & Equations
Geometry
Statistics & Probability
Functions (8)
multiplication is finding an unknown product, and division is finding an unknown factor in these situations.multiplication is finding an unknown product, and division is finding an unknown factor in these situations.
82. K-8 Learning Progressions http://commoncoretools.wordpress.com/
83. HS Pathways 1.) Traditional (US) – 2 Algebra, Geometry and Data, probability and statistics included in each course
2.) International (integrated) three courses including number , algebra, geometry, probability and statistics each year
3.) Compacted version of traditional – grade 7/8 and algebra completed by end of 8th grade
4.) Compacted integrated model, allowing students to reach Calculus or other college level courses
85. The second part of the pathways shows the clusters and standards as they appear in the courses. Each course contains the following components:• • •An introduction to the course and a list of the units in the course Unit titles and unit overviews (see below) Units that show the cluster titles, associated standards, and instructional notes (below)The second part of the pathways shows the clusters and standards as they appear in the courses. Each course contains the following components:• • •An introduction to the course and a list of the units in the course Unit titles and unit overviews (see below) Units that show the cluster titles, associated standards, and instructional notes (below)
86. Number and Quantity Overview
Real Number System
Quantities
Complex Number System
Vector and Matrix Quantities
87. Algebra Overview Seeing Structure in Expressions
Arithmetic with Polynomials and Rational Expressions
Creating Equations
Reasoning with Equations and Inequalities
88. Functions Interpreting Functions
Building Functions
Linear, Quadratic and Exponential Models
Trigonometric Functions
89. Modeling Identify the problem
Formulate a model
Analyze and perform operations
Interpret results
Validate the conclusion
Report on the conclusion
90. Geometry Congruence
Similarity, Right Triangles, and Trigonometry
Circles
Expressing Geometric Properties with Equations
Geometric Measurement and Dimension
Modeling and Geometry
91. Statistics and Probability Interpreting Categorical and Quantitative Data
Making Inferences and Justifying Conclusions
Conditional Probability and the Rules of Probability
Using Probability to Make Decisions
92. Key Advances Focus and coherence
Focus on key topics at each grade level.
Coherent progressions across grade levels.
Balance of concepts and skills
Content standards require both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.
Mathematical practices
Foster reasoning and sense-making in mathematics.
College and career readiness
Level is ambitious but achievable.
93. Recommended Professional Development
Grades K–2, Counting and Cardinality and Number and Operations in Base
Grades K–5 Operations and Algebraic Thinking
Grades 3–5 Number and Operations—Fractions
Grades 6–7 Ratios and Proportional Reasoning
Grade 8 Geometry
94. Prepare for this important transition