1 / 12

Electrophysiology of Visual Attention

Electrophysiology of Visual Attention. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection. Moran and Desimone (1985) “Classical” RF prediction: there should be no difference in responses in these two conditions. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection. Moran and Desimone (1985)

aira
Download Presentation

Electrophysiology of Visual Attention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electrophysiology of Visual Attention

  2. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • “Classical” RF prediction: there should be no difference in responses in these two conditions

  3. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • Result: Response to “Sample” Response to “Sample” Response to Target Response to Target “effective” stimulus at unattended location “effective” stimulus at attended location

  4. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • Result: • Neuron responds vigorously only if its effective stimulus is attended • Interesting caveat: this only applies when there is an ineffective stimulus (to which the monkey attends) present in the V4 RF • When the ineffective stimulus is outside of the cell’s RF, its responses are largely unmodulated

  5. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • What about the time course of this attention effect? • Are cells modulated in advance by the cue? • Or are they modulated by attention when it is shifted to the target location? • What is needed is a experiment design such that the monkey orients attention after the target appears

  6. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Chellazi et al ( 1993) Neural Correlates of Visual Search • Monkey is trained in a delayed match-to-sample task • Cue appears 1.5 seconds before search array • Monkey saccades to target • “good” and “poor” stimuli are identified for each recorded neuron

  7. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Note that monkey isn’t “pre-cued” to attend to a location • Only target features are known prior to choice array onset • With this paradigm it is possible to measure cell activity during delay, during search, and after selection • Note that search array always contains a “good” stimulus for the recorded cell – but that might not be the target

  8. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Initial response of cells is “classical”

  9. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Initial response of cells is “classical” • Response during delay maintains a representation of the target feature

  10. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Initial response of cells is “classical” • Response during delay represents the target feature • Initial response to search array is “classical”

  11. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • About 200 ms after array onset response of cell begins to depend on attention • Response becomes more vigorous if cell is tuned to features of the target (i.e. the selected stimulus) • Response becomes suppressed if cell is tuned to a non-target distractor

  12. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Conclusion: • Attentional selection of locations and/or objects has physiological correlates and consequences • How does attention get to where it needs to go?

More Related