430 likes | 623 Views
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Ian Botterill Dept Colorectal Surgery St James’ University Hospital Leeds. Barry Wood Lancashire & England. Dennis Lillee Western Australia & Australia. Ideal surgical treatment of haemorrhoids.
E N D
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy Ian Botterill Dept Colorectal Surgery St James’ University Hospital Leeds
Barry Wood Lancashire & England Dennis Lillee Western Australia & Australia
Ideal surgical treatment of haemorrhoids Minimal pain, short stay, rapid recuperation, low morbidity, lasting benefit
The Longo procedure Antonio Longo 1st performed 1993 1st reported 1998
terminology • Stapled haemorrhoidopexy • Stapled haemorrhoidectomy • Circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy • Circular stapled anoplasty • PPH • Stapled prolapsectomy • Transverse mucosal prolapsectomy • Longo procedure
Premise • haemorrhoids contribute to continence • haemorrhoids worth preserving • weakened of suspensory lig of rectum • ‘pexy’ addresses the prolapse
Surgical rationale • excision of cylinder of rectal mucosa → replacement of haemorrhoids in anal canal • vascular interruption → shrinkage of prolapsed component • avoidance of anal wound reduces pain • haemorrhoidectomy only treats the consequence of prolapse
Serious adverse events • persistent faecal urgency • persistent anal pain • recto-vaginal fistula • retroperitoneal perforation • rectal perforation • pelvic sepsis • Fournier’s gangrene • rectal pocket syndrome
Major complications of OP care • phenol prostatitis sclero • pelvic cellulitis sclero / band • retroperitoneal abscess sclero • clostridial infection band • tetanus band • systemic sepsis band • severe pain band
New technology • apparent benefits & pitfalls • obvious parallels -laparoscopic cholecystectomy -laparoscopic colorectal surgery -laparoscopic hernia repair • learning curve • NICE 2003 (& Sept 2007)
Training training centres Leeds, Dundee, Guildford, Colchester, Hamburg preceptorship audit -local (pathology / outcomes) -national (ACPGBI PPH database)
Patient selection-indications • prolapsing / prolapsed haemorrhoids • circumferential haemorrhoids
Patient selection-relative contraindications any haemorrhoid operation • diabetics / immuno-suppressed • bleeding diasthesis • faecal incontinence • Crohn’s specific to stapled haemorrhoidopexy • deep ‘funnel shaped’ perineum • large anal skin tags • narrow gap between ischial spines
Consent for open / stapled Prone jack-knife allows ↓engorgement of anal cushions Pre-op GTN / diltiazem
Positioning / placement 4 quadrant sutures Lubrication anal canal
Gentle dilation with obturator alone Reduction haemorrhoids
Insertion CAD & obturator Fixation of CAD
Sequential placement of 2/0 prolene pursestring via pursestring anoscope -2cm above upper end of haemorrhoids: keep at constant height Insertion contralateral belt stitch if prolapse asymmetrical
Insertion fully opened PPH03 gun (along axis of rectum) Crochet hook retrieval of pursestring (each side of gun housing) Traction on pursestring during gun closure
Complete gun closure check vagina - saline infiltration helpful Ensure closed gun @ ‘4cm’ on housing prior to firing
½ turn to release gun sutured haemostasis (4/0 vicryl) – much less common using newer PPH03 avoid diathermy
Perineal field block -40ml 0.475% ropivicaine -6 x 5ml columns ant & post -2 x 5ml submucosal columns voltarol & paracetamol pr lactulose ?metronidazole no anal canal dressing Post-op pain relief Discharge instructions -pain / retention urine / fever -avoidance anal intercourse See @ 4-6/52 in case need dilation
Role of pathology • audit -correlation with outcome -inclusion of glandular / squamous -inclusion of smooth m deep to squamous epithelium • unexpected pathology
Role of pathology • n=84 • 19/84 squamous epithelium in donut (M>>F) - no difference in Cleveland Clinic continence score • 6/19 had smooth m deep to squamous epithelium - no difference in Cleveland Clinic continence score • 79/84 contained smooth muscle Shanmugam et al Colorectal Dis 2005;7:172-5
Role of pathology • n=68 • 64/68 contained smooth muscle • 24/64 had smooth muscle with overlying squamous cell / transitional epithelium • no outcome difference Kam et al. DCR 2005:48:1437-41
results • >25 RCTs • 4 reviews (inc. 2 position statements) • forthcoming meta-analysis • 1 NICE appraisal (2nd planned)
Operation duration: -stapled haemorrhoidopexy superior
Pain – favours stapled haemorrhoidopexy Pain: stapled haemorrhoidopexy superior
Hospital stay: stapled haemorrhoidopexy superior
Redo surgery: - stapled haemorrhoidopexy & closed equivalent - open superior to stapled haemorrhoidopexy
Post-operative incontinence: no difference
Anal stenosis: no difference
Cost-benefit modelling • gun cost £350 • bed cost / night £200 • theatre / hr £1000 • if the above factors are assumed - cost equivalence to provider • disregards out of hospital costs Leeds Colorectal
Summary • early concerns not sustained based on the evidence • proven benefits: - ↓operative time / ↓ I-P stay / ↑ return to work - ↓post-op pain / ↓ bleeding / ↓analgesia - ↓stenosis • but: - ↑ recurrent prolapse (definitions vary) - ↑ rate redo surgery Leeds Colorectal
Causes of urgency • ? loss anal transitional zone: - not proven • ? loss of RAIR: - disproven • ? loss of upper part of IAS: possible - long anal canal • ? IAS fragmentation- possible - gentle dil’n / chem. sphincterotomy / LA block • ? pre-existing anal sphincter injury