290 likes | 413 Views
Professional Development Intensive Workshop Participatory Applied Research on Enhancing Learning: a Spectrum of Small Change to Transformation . Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine University eric.hamilton@pepperdine.edu http://tinyurl.com/tuskegee-par-jan2013. thank you!. honor to be here
E N D
Professional Development Intensive Workshop Participatory Applied Research on Enhancing Learning: a Spectrum of Small Change to Transformation.Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine Universityeric.hamilton@pepperdine.eduhttp://tinyurl.com/tuskegee-par-jan2013
thank you! • honor to be here • goal is for us to be more effective at enhancing student learning • workshop is participatory • so is the work • 3 parts – a) intro and planning, then divide into b) media authoring or model-eliciting activities
topics & keywords • introductions • key challenges we share • future learning environments, action research, complex reasoning, creativity, passion and immersion in learning; intergenerational collaboration; media-making; tablets; participatory content development
Other notes • finding ways or tools to change. • our models are insufficient • what we do was already insufficient • getting better at what we used to will still be insufficient for what comes next • now at an intense historical nexus • and a tantalizing and breathtaking precipice of tools and possibilities
what is different? • about what you are teaching • who you are teaching • the culture of our teaching
Pop culture … • … is so easy to ridicule • But sometimes expresses compelling truths • Schooling and testing is largely a memory fade race. • We try to leverage long-term knowledge by getting students to experience memory fade after the test rather than before. • How can we not only get learners to develop but sustainably use new ideas? • the quest is for disciplinary learner engagement and immersion
A vision for the future • In every aspect of life (except schools!) what it means to learn has changed from the pre-digital era. • The nature of complex thinking and the competencies required for functioning in society have changed. • We rely more on social interaction and intelligence in our own learning journeys • The fields of learning science and human and social dynamics help focus on the possibilities of for future educational environments
A complex system • Each principle insinuates itself into each of these others and derives meaning from the others • These are all inputs into and outputs from each other • Together, they form a complex system with amazing and infinite combinatoric possibilities how we shape student experience and intellectual development
it's all about engagement • if you don't learn the way I teach, I must learn to teach the way you learn • the principles – and each of our personalized adaptation of them – are integral to a quest for engaging • engagement mediates learning • (notes on a continuum of engagement to flow)
It’s all about me • Flow is highly phenomenological • Autotelic functioning is personalized • The research is on the individual • Michael Jordan in the zone, Game 2, 1992 Finals against the Blazers
What are the analogs to group flow? • Not Jordan in the 1992 Finals but the Horace Grant dish to John Paxson to close out the 1993 finals • An orchestra that loses a sense of time while maintaining a perfect sense of timing
Interactional bandwidth • Consider two human activities • Hand-raising in a classroom • Multi-tasking in electronically-mediated activities like video games or television • Human attentional & interactional capacity is significantly higher than hand-raising patterns of typical classrooms suggest! • Future learning environments, with higher bandwidth, will enable greater cognitive/affective density and layering. 110.. 300.. 1200..4800.. 14400.. 56K... 256.. 10Mbs .. 100Mbs • Summary of principles
Sightlines • See structure in • Cognition • Relationships • Content • Featural elements of knowledge • Take me to the wizard • Visualization and simulation systems let us see more, and see more accurately Summary of principles
Connectivity • We nourish each other • We impart not only knowledge one to another, but meaning • The cognitive neuroscience of learning in social contexts is markedly different than isolated learning Summary of principles
Modeling • Systems thinking becomes more salient than factual accretion • Retention is a different in part because synaptic connectivity is richer and has more pathways
Fluid contextual transitions Greater emphasis on heterogeneous competencies and hybrid functionality • Between virtual and IRL • Social and solitary, analytic and immersive, drill and flow • Examining objects to being an object • Emulating an agent and being emulated • Analytic, reflective, immersive • More interoperability of individual-social-machine knowledge forms. Summary of principles
Individualization • Imagine a world where schools conformed to youngsters rather than vice versa • Take a moment to inventory the human and social tragedy that ascends from only a small fraction of learners forming natural fits with the schooling environment • Alienation • Disengagement Summary of principles
Four grand challenges • Break-out role influencing society innovative tools and ways of thinking about collaboration. • Agility in learning through the life cycle • Ultra-deep model collaboration: sharing human experience • Unlocking group “flow” in the science of collaboration.
Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine introduction to meas
Common questions • What are they? What aren’t they? • Do they “work” ? • Can they be assessed? • Is this problem-based learning? • Brad Pitt and Oakland CA
One way to think of them • Tools to help understand how knowledge and complex reasoning evolve and grow • Tools to help knowledge and complex reasoning evolve and grow • MEAs, as much as anything, are about how to interpret what is seen
Two important axioms • Knowledge and competencies are structure and interconnected – they are not additive. • Knowledge and competencies can represented with models that are expressed orally, visually, or in countless other ways
The most important tool a [researcher][professor] has • …is to understand the models that learners possess.
elicitation • The best way to understand or work with models is to elicit them, to draw them out • Not the same as pounding them in • Sort of a “reverse polarity”
Elicitation part 2 • Elicitation – drawing out – is essential for understanding cognition. And it needs to be done carefully, in a way that preserves structure. • Years of research produced the six principles for elicitation. • Not just elicitation though…but testing, revision and transformation
A funny, symmetrical thing happened • …on the road to understanding conceptual evolution • Elicitation implies translation and representation • Testing implies representational manipulaton and adaptation • Revision implies re-adaptation
Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs) • Developed by math educators (Lesh) • Client-driven, open-ended problems designed to be model eliciting and thought revealing • Require students to mathematizeinformation and structure in context • e.g., quantify, organize, dimensionalize • Adapted to engineering (Diefes-Dux)