1 / 12

BOS Testbeam Results in 2001

BOS Testbeam Results in 2001. 1. Drift time spectra 2. RT-relation 3. Resolution - HV & threshold dependance -Comparison with the 1999 data 4. Summary. MPI & LMU, Munich.

akamu
Download Presentation

BOS Testbeam Results in 2001

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BOS Testbeam Results in 2001 1. Drift time spectra 2. RT-relation 3. Resolution -HV & threshold dependance -Comparison with the 1999 data 4. Summary MPI & LMU, Munich ________________________________________________________________________________________ Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  2. Teststand & Program 3 sections scanned, 10 cm each ML2 Chamber: BOS-0 - same chamber type as in the 1999 testbeam, (differrent electronics!) - runs with 2 or 4 mezzanine cards - flowing nitrogen in ML2, to avoid high HV currents Threshold scan: 60 mV 77 mV 90 mV 98 mV HV scan: 2980 V 3080 V 3180 V Angular scans (900-1000, 1100-1300) => still to be analised… ML1 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  3. Drift Time Spectra 2001: 60 mV threshold, trise=(10.6±0.3) ns 1999: 25e threshold, trise=(8.4±0.4) ns 3080 V 77 mV 60 mV 77 mV 98 mV 2980 V 3080 V 3180 V _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  4. Fine Time Oscillations Channel 2 Channel 16 Fine time spectra Fine time spectra Uncorrected Drift Time Uncorrected Drift Time Corrected Drift Time Corrected Drift Time trise=12.8 ns trise=11.6 ns Excluded from the analysis! _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  5. Maximum drift time & Rise time trise=4T0 Dt=t0-tmax • Dt decreases with : threshold (due to the change in t0) • HV (due to t0 & tmax) • trise degradation at higher threshols and lower HV => • implies degradation in the tube resolution ______________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  6. RT-relation residuals 1. step: applying the rt-relation from 1999 testbeam (determined by a silicon tracker) and tracking through the 6 layers (using LMU analysis software) 2. step: Autocalibration – correcting the rt-relation using residuals from the track, 15 bins of 1 mm r=4.5mm r=10.5 mm _____________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  7. Tube Resolution • Method: • - tracking through the 5 layers, • track interpolation to • the tube in the excluded layer • (excluding layers 1, 3, 4 & 6) • histograming the distance of the • real hit from the track, rextrapolated-rmeasured • Measured resolution: • smeas=s(rextrapolated-rmeasured) Correcting for the fit error-> tube resolution: • sreal= sqrt (s2measured-s2corr), • Where s2corr=s2(m)*z2+s2(b), • track is given by : y=z*m+b _____________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  8. Tube Resolution - Results Preliminary! Preliminary! • Similar resolution curves • obtained for all layers. - Good reproducibility! _____________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  9. Tube Resolution – Threshold & HV dependence Preliminary! Preliminary! • degradation of the resolution with the rising threshold • resolution improves with higer HV (at lower radii) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  10. Comparison with the 1999 data Resolution curve for the 1999 testbeam: obtained using the same analysis method as for 2001 testbeam data This is compared to the single tube resolution, obtained by a silicon tracker => 5-hit tracking method gives similar results as silicon tracker (differences for large radii) 2001 testbeam results show a slight degradation in the resolution with respect to the 1999 testbeam (same chamber type and gas as in 1999)  Electronis? Preliminary! _____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  11. BOS <-> BIL2001 testbeam results BOS BIL • BOS resolution curve rises somewhat more slowly • similar resolution at large r _____________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting, CERN

  12. Summary Drift time spectra : • low noise • larger rise time compared with 1999. • dependence on threshold & HV • fine time oscillations in some channels Tube Resolution: • calculated by tracking through 5 layers (LMU software) • similar resolution for all layers, reproducible results • dependence on threshold & HV • degradation with respect to the 1999. data (both silicon tracker and tracking through 5 layers give similar result for 1999.) • BOS 2001. comparable to BIL 2001. testbeam results Many, many special thanks to the ROME group, for the constant help, support & encouragement !!! _____________________________________________________________________________________ 11 Sandra Horvat 10.12.2000, Testbeam meeting,CERN

More Related