140 likes | 149 Views
This article discusses various methods used by the Competition Bureau of Canada to detect and investigate cartels, including the Immunity and Leniency Programs, Information Centre and Complaints Line, Whistleblower Initiative, Proactive Monitoring and Competitive Intelligence, Partnerships with Domestic and International Agencies, Relationships with Procurement Authorities, Outreach in the Business and Legal Communities, and Public Awareness of the Bureau's Mandate and Programs. Two case examples are also provided.
E N D
Alternative Methods of Cartel Detection in Canada Remarks of Kristen PinheyCompetition Law OfficerCompetition Bureau Canada Cartel Working Group SG 1 Teleconference on Ex Officio Cartel Investigations October 14, 2014
Immunity and Leniency Programs • The goal of the Competition Bureau’s Immunity Program is to uncover and stop criminal anti-competitive activity and to deter others from engaging in this behaviour • The Immunity Program has proven to be the Bureau’s single most powerful means of detecting, investigating and prosecuting criminal activity under the Act • Our Leniency Program complements our Immunity Program by supporting the effective and efficient enforcement of the Competition Act
Other Methods of Cartel Detection • Information Centre and complaints line • Whistleblower initiative • Proactive monitoring and competitive intelligence • Partnerships with domestic and international agencies • Relationships with procurement authorities • Outreach with the business and legal communities • Public awareness of the Bureau’s mandate and programs
Information Centre and Complaints Line • The Information Centre is the primary point of entry for requests from members of the public • The public can contact the Bureau through the Information Centre by telephone or e-mail • We also have an online complaints form to facilitate the complaints process
Criminal Cartel Whistleblower Initiative • The Competition Act has a specific provision protecting the identity of a “whistleblower” • The Bureau recently announced the establishment of a new whistleblower initiative and updates to its website to provide information about how whistleblowers can contact the Bureau to report alleged criminal activity • Two of the objectives of this initiative are: • To increase the quality and quantity of whistleblower requests. • To increase the number of cases originating outside of the Immunity Program.
Proactive Monitoring and Competitive Intelligence • Bureau officers regularly monitor the media for potential cartel conduct • The Bureau also benefits from information sharing within the agency • Additionally, Bureau officers and management frequently liaise with international counterparts
Partnerships with Domestic and International Agencies • The Bureau has partnerships with several domestic agencies which complement and support the work of the Bureau, as well as strong international partnerships • On the domestic side, we are strengthening our ties with various Canadian police forces and their respective white-collar crime investigation units • On the international front, the Bureau works in partnership with its international counterparts when conducting international investigations
Relationships with Procurement Authorities • The Bureau provides anti bid-rigging presentations to all levels of government, including Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), the principal procurement agency of the Canadian Federal government • These outreach presentations provide procurement authorities with knowledge of how to detect, deter and report bid-rigging • We are in the process of completing a Memorandum of Understanding with PWGSC that will formalize our strong relationship with the agency
Outreach in the Business and Legal Communities • The Bureau regularly conducts outreach sessions with the business community • Following these presentations, the Bureau uses a post-outreach presentation survey to evaluate the effectiveness of the presentation and participants’ increased awareness • The Bureau publishes for consumers and businesses on its website
Public Awareness of the Bureau’s Mandate and Programs • Maintaining and improving public awareness of the Bureau’s role and mandate is a crucial feature of maintaining credible domestic enforcement programs • The Bureau regularly publishes press releases following events, such as the laying of charges and/or guilty pleas, and also publishes speeches given by Bureau officials • The Bureau’s cartel awareness efforts, particularly the media attention that large cartel and bid-rigging cases draw, increase awareness of competition law throughout the general Canadian population
Case Example: Quebec Gas Cartel • Investigation of retail gas stations who conspired to fix prices in local communities in Quebec • Many different investigative tools used, including wiretaps and searches • The Bureau searched 88 premises in two weeks, the largest search ever undertaken by the Bureau. • The matter is currently before the courts • 39 individuals and 15 companies have been charged • 33 individuals and 7 companies have pleaded or were found guilty, with fines totalling over $3 million • 6 individuals have been sentenced to terms of imprisonment totalling 54 months
Case Example: IT Services • Investigation of companies and individuals who rigged bids to obtain Government of Canada contracts for information technology services worth approximately $67 million • The matter is currently before the courts • Charges laid against 14 individuals and 7 companies • To date, 2 individuals have each pleaded guilty to one count of bid-rigging • A 3-month preliminary hearing was completed and the accused have been committed to stand trial
Case Example: Bid Rigging in the Construction Industry • In February 2011, the Québec provincial police force, the Sureté du Québec, created a Permanent Anti-Corruption Unit (UPAC) • The Bureau conducted a joint investigation with UPAC involving bid-rigging in the construction industry in greater Montreal area • In June 2012, a total of 77 charges were laid against nine companies and 11 individuals in in connection with a collusion scheme. These charges included 20 counts of bid-rigging against nine companies and 24 counts of bid-rigging against six individuals