1 / 25

Reading assignments: ecological impacts

Reading assignments: ecological impacts. Invasives and fire: D’Antonio and Vitousek 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass-fire cycle, and global change. Annual review of Ecology and Sytematics 23: 65-87 .

akiko
Download Presentation

Reading assignments: ecological impacts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reading assignments: ecological impacts • Invasives and fire: • D’Antonio and Vitousek 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass-fire cycle, and global change. Annual review of Ecology and Sytematics 23:65-87. • Brooks et al. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 54: 677-688. • Ecosystem changes: • Crooks 2002. Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153-166.

  2. Impacts • Ecological • ii) Ecosystem functions • Ecosystem engineers: What are they?

  3. Impacts • Ecological • ii) Ecosystem functions • Ecosystem engineers: What are they? • Alter ecosystem physical processes (water use, N cycling) • Change habitat structure (more complexity, less complexity) • Effects cascade through community

  4. Impacts • Ecological • ii) Ecosystem functions • Overview • Specific examples: General compilation • From Crooks (2002)

  5. Effects on Nitrogen N loss Invasive plants Fire Altered composition Altered litter quality Altered microbial activity Altered root exudation N fixation Altered microclimate Altered microbial community Altered NPP Altered timing of uptake N cycling and pools • Modified from D’Antonio and Hobbie in Sax et al. 2005

  6. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • ~409 animals and 598 plants are federally listed species in US

  7. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • ~409 animals and 598 plants are federally listed species in US • 294 (29%) threatened by direct effects of invasive species (IUCN)

  8. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Effects can be by: • Direct species replacement • Indirect through effects on community structure or function

  9. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species : IUCN database • Overview • Effects can be by: • Direct species replacement • Indirect through effects on community structure or function • Worldwide • Extinctions: 104 records of extinctions directly due to invasives • 88 animals (many birds, NZ and HI) • 16 plants • Endangered and vulnerable: 1317 directly due to invasives

  10. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: King Ranch bluestem • Bothriochloa ischaemum (Caucasian bluestem) brought in to southern Great Plains (NM, OK, TX) from Russia in 1929 • C4 perennial bunchgrass: • establishes readily from seed • long growing season • tolerates heavy grazing • fair forage quality • forms dense sod in mature pastures

  11. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: King Ranch bluestem • Bothriochloa ischaemum (Caucasian bluestem) brought in to southern Great Plains (NM, OK, TX) from Russia in 1929 • C4 perennial bunchgrass: desirable forage species • Seeded extensively (for example, ~2 million acres in western OK)

  12. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: King Ranch bluestem • Bothriochloa ischaemum (Caucasian bluestem) brought in to southern Great Plains (NM, OK, TX) from Russia in 1929 • C4 perennial bunchgrass: desirable forage species • Seeded extensively • But extremely invasive: • Spread along highways into native areas (cemetaries, native grasslands) • Difficult to control • Threatens federally listed endangered plant Ambrosia cheiranthefolia (south Texas ambrosia)

  13. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: Hawaii • 80-90 native plant species extinct • 270 plant species listed as threatened or endangered • 94 noxious weeds, many more alien species

  14. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: California • Seabloom et al (2006) examined distribution of 834 exotic plants in CA. Multivariate analyses (CCA, SEM)

  15. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: California • Seabloom et al (2006) examined distribution of 834 exotic plants in CA. Multivariate analyses (CCA, SEM) • exotic/invasive species tightly linked to distribution of imperiled species (regression, CCA)

  16. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Overview • Specific examples: California • Seabloom et al (2006) examined distribution of 834 exotic plants in CA. Multivariate analyses (CCA, SEM) • exotic/invasive species tightly linked to distribution of imperiled species (CCA) • Human activities facilitate initial invasion but exotics spread ahead of front of human development into areas with high numbers of threatened plants (SEMs)

  17. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Not a lot of evidence for extinctions (Gurevitch and Padilla 2004) • But: ‘Winners and Losers’ in anthropogenic biotic homogenization (McKinney and Lockwood 1999) • Invasive plants are ‘winners’ • ‘losers’ are species whose numbers/range decline • Geographically restricted natives with specific habitat requirements = high extinction rates

  18. Impacts • Ecological • iii) Threatened & endangered species • Not a lot of evidence for extinctions (Gurevitch and Padilla 2004) • But: ‘Winners and Losers’ in anthropogenic biotic homogenization (McKinney and Lockwood 1999) • Invasive plants are ‘winners’ • ‘losers’ are species whose numbers/range decline • Geographically restricted natives with specific habitat requirements = high extinction rates • Traits of ‘winners’ • r selected • Widespread • Rapid dispersal • High variability • Generalist • Human commensalism • Traits of ‘losers’ • K selected • Rare • Slow dispersal • Low variability • specialist • Maladapted to humans

  19. Impacts • Ecological • Summary • Only a small percentage (0.1%) of introduced plants become a problem

  20. Impacts • Ecological • Summary • Only a small percentage (0.1%) of introduced plants become a problem • Ecological impacts typically involve: (1) nutrients/water flow; (2) primary production impacts; (3) alterations of disturbance regimes; and (4) changes in community dynamics

  21. Impacts • Ecological • Summary • Only a small percentage (0.1%) of introduced plants become a problem • Ecological impacts typically involve: (1) nutrients/water flow; (2) primary production impacts; (3) alterations of disturbance regimes; and (4) changes in community dynamics • Effects observed as: • Species replacements (direct/individual or large scale, w/ or w/o interactions with other factors such as fire)

  22. Impacts • Ecological • Summary • Only a small percentage (0.1%) of introduced plants become a problem • Ecological impacts typically involve: (1) nutrients/water flow; (2) primary production impacts; (3) alterations of disturbance regimes; and (4) changes in community dynamics • Effects observed as: • Species replacements (direct/individual or large scale, w/ or w/o interactions with other factors such as fire) • Ecosystem functions (C sequestration, N fixation, fire frequency/intensity)

  23. Impacts • Ecological • Summary • Only a small percentage (0.1%) of introduced plants become a problem • Ecological impacts typically involve: (1) nutrients/water flow; (2) primary production impacts; (3) alterations of disturbance regimes; and (4) changes in community dynamics • Effects observed as: • Species replacements (direct/individual or large scale, w/ or w/o interactions with other factors such as fire) • Ecosystem functions (C sequestration, N fixation, fire frequency/intensity) • Loss of native species (threatened or endangered species) • Often in conjunction with human-caused habitat change

  24. Impacts • Ecological • Summary • Only a small percentage (0.1%) of introduced plants become a problem • Ecological impacts typically involve: (1) nutrients/water flow; (2) primary production impacts; (3) alterations of disturbance regimes; and (4) changes in community dynamics • Effects observed as: • Species replacements (direct/individual or large scale, w/ or w/o interactions with other factors such as fire) • Ecosystem functions (C sequestration, N fixation, fire frequency/intensity) • Loss of native species (threatened or endangered species) • Often in conjunction with human-caused habitat change • Especially on islands • Especially rare/specialized species • More evidence for population reduction than for extinction (e.g. Harrison et al 2006)

More Related