120 likes | 468 Views
The Poisoning of Indigenous Migrant Women Workers and Children: From Deadly Colonialism to Toxic Globalization . Invisibility of Mexican Migrant Workers. Migrant workers are one of the most unprotected and unorganized sectors of the working class.
E N D
The Poisoning of Indigenous Migrant Women Workers and Children: From Deadly Colonialism to Toxic Globalization
Invisibility of Mexican Migrant Workers Migrant workers are one of the most unprotected and unorganized sectors of the working class. They are not represented in mainstream media or labor analyses. Represented even less if they are indigenous women. Trade liberalization has increased the exploitation and discrimination of these workers.
How did it Start? Spanish Colonization Institutionalized assimilation Forced migration: first by colonizers then by industrialization and agriculture modernization. Modernization and trade liberation made Mexico open to export oriented agribusiness. Communal peasant land bought by foreign interests
Work Conditions Mothers have to bring children to fields. Contractors for agribusiness promise good housing and wages, but don't deliver them. Unstable houses, contaminated water, denied healthcare, etc. Business find ways to justify bad conditions.
Effects of Pesticides The toxic chemicals cause acute and chronic health problems. Information on toxicity hidden from workers. When laws are in place against this they are not enforced.
Conclusion “We have to understand that globalization is not a neutral process. It is a continuation of colonialism, a highly exploitative and unequal process in which relations based on race class and gender shape the lives of...the most unprotected and marginalized labor force – Indigenous women and their families.” Our responsibility to know where our food comes from, and who is putting it on our table.
Gender and Agricultural Imagery: Pesticide Advertisements in the 21st Century Agricultural Transition
Feminist discourse has mostly overlooked the standing of women in rural and agricultural space. Agricultural media perpetuates gender stereotypes.
1950s-1970s 50s-60s- Faith in science was a defining value. 75-76- Strong male controlling environment. Nature as adversary Absence of female imagery Emphasized chemical potency
1970's-1990's Concern over pollution and sustainability grew. 95-96- Advertising associates nature with feminine ideals of nurture and gentleness Harmony with nature Values of stewardship to land and family Pesticide portrayed as benign or helpful to environment
Conclusion “Both nature and females are viewed as subordinate but critical to survival.” These advertising trends are the result of a society where the work of women in agriculture is marginalized or unacknowledged.