1 / 8

Meaningful Use Stage 3 July 20, 2012

HITPC - Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Subgroup. Meaningful Use Stage 3 July 20, 2012. 0. Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Subgroup. Chairs: Jeff Donnell and Larry Garber

alaric
Download Presentation

Meaningful Use Stage 3 July 20, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HITPC - Information Exchange WorkgroupCare Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Subgroup Meaningful Use Stage 3 July 20, 2012 0

  2. Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Subgroup • Chairs: Jeff Donnell and Larry Garber • Members: Peter DeVault, Jonah Frohlich, Arien Malec • Goal: Develop recommendations for Meaningful Use Stage 3 for review by the Information Exchange Workgroup. 1

  3. Need to decide objectives for 3 areas of Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement • Transitions of care : HIE Functions: push, query, cross-organization access, publish subscribe • Patient driven communication : HIE Functions:view, download, transmit, consume (patient-generated data like PROMs and other), patient self management, secure-messaging • Data portability: HIE Functions: ability to move data from one EHR system to another 2

  4. Process for developing Stage 3 Objectives • Step 1: Start with Stage 1 and Stage 2 objectives • Existing Stage 1 objectives • Proposed Stage 1 and Stage 2 objectives (NPRM as amended by HITPC and HITSC) • Step 2: Develop new criteria • Which Stage 1 or Stage 2 (proposed) objectives should be expanded? • Are there new objectives that need to be created? • Are there Stage 1 or Stage 2 objectives to be deleted or consolidated? • Step 3: Assess proposed new criteria against General MU and IE WG-specific policy objective criteria (next page) 3

  5. Every proposed objective should meet two sets of criteria: General MU Criteria and IE WG-specific Criteria General MU Criteria • Supports new model of care (e.g., team-based, outcomes-oriented, population management) • Addresses national health priorities (e.g., NQS, Million Hearts) • Broad applicability (since MU is a floor) • Provider specialties (e.g., primary care, specialty care) • Patient health needs • Areas of the country • Promotes advancement -- Not "topped out" or not already driven by market forces • Achievable-- mature standards widely adopted or could be widely adopted by 2016 IE WG-specific criteria • What overall health information exchange objective do we want to accomplish in Stage 3? • Current IE WG policy objective criteria: • Consolidate our gains • Make HIEeasy • Advance queryfor continuity of care and administrative simplification 4

  6. Stage 3 Development Timeline 5

  7. IE Workgroup Timeline 6

  8. Next Steps • Schedule additional calls • Prepare initial thoughts for July 25th IE WG call 7

More Related