1 / 15

CEQuery Application

CEQuery Application. Julie – Ann Pegden Curtin University. 2:30 – 3:45. Post CEQuery comments analysis. Julie-Ann Pegden . Final product... . 2 step process. Step 1 – CEQuery scores the comments

alaura
Download Presentation

CEQuery Application

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CEQuery Application Julie – Ann Pegden Curtin University 2:30 – 3:45

  2. Post CEQuery commentsanalysis Julie-Ann Pegden

  3. Final product...

  4. 2 step process • Step 1 – CEQuery scores the comments • Step 2 – IBM SPSS Text Analytics for Surveys further categorises comments and produces the diagram

  5. Background - eVALUate • Curtin’s online system for gathering and reporting student’s perceptions of their learning experience • Unit survey comprises 11 quantitative items and 2 qualitative items: Please comment on the most helpful aspects of the unit Please comment on how you think the unit might be improved

  6. How we use CEQuery in eVALUate Report at multiple levels: • University • Faculty • Teaching school/dept • Course • Unit • Or by other demographic breakdown (eg. grade, campus, year of study, mode of study, unit size, etc.)

  7. How we report CEQuery results • Routine eVALUate reporting • Course review • Adhoc basis by request (eg. by unit/course coordinators)

  8. How we report CEQuery results in course review

  9. How we report CEQuery results in course review (cont’d)

  10. What do we do post CEQuery? • More indepth/fine grained analysis of comments from single domain or sub-domain or a combination of subdomains • Supplementary to the CEQuery results • Focus on the needs improvement sub-domain(s) with the highest counts and/or ratio of comments

  11. Final product...

  12. Why is it worthwhile? Time saving (eg. units with high enrolments - rather than reading a multitude of both BA and NI comments, a busy unit coordinator gets to see the main issues “at a glance”). Gives the issues as well as the extent of the problem (theme counts)

  13. Requirements? Same Best Aspects and Needs Improvement open-ended questions as CEQ Minimum number of comment hits before it would be worth creating a visualisation – 100? Software - SPSS Text Analytics for Surveys (site licence?)

  14. Considerations... • Confidentiality/sensitivity issues: • No raw comments are reported - themes only • How much time to spend carrying out the analysis? • Dictionary – modified for unit level use

  15. Julie-Ann Pegden Curtin Teaching and Learning J.Pegden@curtin.edu.au

More Related