CP violation Lecture 1

1. CP violationLecture 1 N. Tuning Niels Tuning (1)

2. Plan • Tue 5 Feb: Intro + Standard Model • Fri 8 Feb: CKM matrix + Unitarity Triangle • Tue 12 Feb: Mixing + Master eqs. + B0J/ψKs • Fri 15 Feb: CP violation in B(s) decays • Tue 19 Feb: Experiment (dr. R. Lambert) • Fri 22 Feb: Mini-project (MSc. V. Syropoulos) • Tue 26 Feb: CP violation in K decays + Overview • Fri 1 Mar: Exam • Final Mark: 2/3*Exam + 1/6*Homework + 1/6*Mini project • In March: 7 Lectures on Flavour Physics by prof.dr. R. Fleischer Niels Tuning (2)

4. Grand picture…. These lectures Main motivation Universe Niels Tuning (4)

5. Introduction: it’s all about the charged current • “CP violation” is about the weak interactions, • In particular, the charged current interactions: • The interesting stuff happens in the interaction with quarks • Therefore, people also refer to this field as “flavour physics” Niels Tuning (5)

6. Motivation 1: Understanding the Standard Model • “CP violation” is about the weak interactions, • In particular, the charged current interactions: • Quarks can only change flavour through charged current interactions Niels Tuning (6)

7. Introduction: it’s all about the charged current • “CP violation” is about the weak interactions, • In particular, the charged current interactions: • In 1st hour: • P-parity, C-parity, CP-parity •  the neutrino shows that P-parity is maximally violated Niels Tuning (7)

8. W+ W- b gVub gV*ub u Introduction: it’s all about the charged current • “CP violation” is about the weak interactions, • In particular, the charged current interactions: • In 1st hour: • P-parity, C-parity, CP-parity •  Symmetry related to particle – anti-particle Niels Tuning (8)

9. Equal amounts of matter & anti matter (?) Matter Dominates ! Motivation 2: Understanding the universe • It’s about differences in matter and anti-matter • Why would they be different in the first place? • We see they are different: our universe is matter dominated Niels Tuning (9)

10. Where and how do we generate the Baryon asymmetry? • No definitive answer to this question yet! • In 1967 A. Sacharov formulated a set of general conditions that any such mechanism has to meet • You need a process that violates the baryon number B:(Baryon number of matter=1, of anti-matter = -1) • Both C and CP symmetries should be violated • Conditions 1) and 2) should occur during a phase in which there is no thermal equilibrium • In these lectures we will focus on 2): CP violation • Apart from cosmological considerations, I will convince you that there are more interesting aspects in CP violation Niels Tuning (10)

11. Introduction: it’s all about the charged current • “CP violation” is about the weak interactions, • In particular, the charged current interactions: • Same initial and final state • Look at interference between B0 fCP and B0  B0  fCP Niels Tuning (11)

12. x b̃ s̃ s b g̃ Bs g̃ Bs s̃ s b b̃ x “Box” diagram: ΔB=2 “Penguin” diagram: ΔB=1 s b s b b μ s d K* g̃ B0 b s μ μ x b̃ s̃ μ μ s s̃ g̃ Bs b x μ b̃ Motivation 3: Sensitive to find new physics • “CP violation” is about the weak interactions, • In particular, the charged current interactions: • Are heavy particles running around in loops? Niels Tuning (12)

13. s b b s Matter Dominates ! Recap: • CP-violation (or flavour physics) is about charged current interactions • Interesting because: • Standard Model: in the heart of quark interactions • Cosmology: related to matter – anti-matter asymetry • Beyond Standard Model: measurements are sensitive to new particles Niels Tuning (13)

14. Grand picture…. These lectures Main motivation Universe Niels Tuning (14)

15. Personal impression: • People think it is a complicated part of the Standard Model (me too:-). Why? • Non-intuitive concepts? • Imaginary phase in transition amplitude, T ~ eiφ • Different bases to express quark states, d’=0.97 d + 0.22 s + 0.003 b • Oscillations (mixing) of mesons: |K0> ↔ |K0> • Complicated calculations? • Many decay modes? “Beetopaipaigamma…” • PDG reports 347 decay modes of the B0-meson: • Γ1 l+νl anything ( 10.33 ± 0.28 ) × 10−2 • Γ347ν ν γ <4.7 × 10−5 CL=90% • And for one decay there are often more than one decay amplitudes… Niels Tuning (15)

16. Start slowly: P and C violation Niels Tuning (16)

17. Continuous vs discrete symmetries • Space, time translation & orientation symmetries are all continuous symmetries • Each symmetry operation associated with one ore more continuous parameter • There are also discrete symmetries • Charge sign flip (Q  -Q) : C parity • Spatial sign flip ( x,y,z  -x,-y,-z) : P parity • Time sign flip (t  -t) : T parity • Are these discrete symmetries exact symmetries that are observed by all physics in nature? • Key issue of this course Niels Tuning (17)

18. +  Three Discrete Symmetries • Parity, P • Parity reflects a system through the origin. Convertsright-handed coordinate systems to left-handed ones. • Vectors change sign but axial vectors remain unchanged • x  -x , p  -p, butL = x  p  L • Charge Conjugation, C • Charge conjugation turns a particle into its anti-particle • e +e- , K -K + • Time Reversal, T • Changes, for example, the direction of motion of particles • t -t Niels Tuning (18)

19. Example: People believe in symmetry… • Instruction for Abel Tasman, explorer of Australia (1642): • “Since many rich mines and other treasures have been found in countries north of the equator between 15o and 40o latitude, there is no doubt that countries alike exist south of the equator. • The provinces in Peru and Chili rich of gold and silver, all positioned south of the equator, are revealing proofs hereof.” Niels Tuning (19)

20. S=1/2 S=1/2 A realistic experiment: the Wu experiment (1956) • Observe radioactive decay of Cobalt-60 nuclei • The process involved: 6027Co  6028Ni + e- + ne • 6027Co is spin-5 and 6028Ni is spin-4, both e- and ne are spin-½ • If you start with fully polarized Co (SZ=5) the experiment is essentially the same (i.e. there is only one spin solution for the decay) |5,+5>  |4,+4> + |½ ,+½> + |½,+½> S=4 Niels Tuning (20)

21. Intermezzo: Spin and Parity and Helicity • We introduce a new quantity: Helicity = the projection of the spin on the direction of flight of a particle H=+1 (“right-handed”) H=-1 (“left-handed”) Niels Tuning (21)

22. The Wu experiment – 1956 • Experimental challenge: how do you obtain a sample of Co(60) where the spins are aligned in one direction • Wu’s solution: adiabatic demagnetization of Co(60) in magnetic fields at very low temperatures (~1/100 K!). Extremely challenging in 1956. Niels Tuning (22)

23. The Wu experiment – 1956 • The surprising result: the counting rate is different • Electrons are preferentially emitted in direction opposite of 60Co spin! • Careful analysis of results shows that experimental data is consistent with emission of left-handed (H=-1) electrons only at any angle!! ‘Backward’ Counting ratew.r.t unpolarized rate 60Co polarization decreasesas function of time ‘Forward’ Counting ratew.r.t unpolarized rate Niels Tuning (23)

24. The Wu experiment – 1956 • Physics conclusion: • Angular distribution of electrons shows that only pairs of left-handed electrons / right-handed anti-neutrinos are emitted regardless of the emission angle • Since right-handed electrons are known to exist (for electrons H is not Lorentz-invariant anyway), this means no left-handed anti-neutrinos are produced in weak decay • Parity is violated in weak processes • Not just a little bit but 100% • How can you see that 60Co violates parity symmetry? • If there is parity symmetry there should exist no measurement that can distinguish our universe from a parity-flipped universe, but we can! Niels Tuning (24)

25. So P is violated, what’s next? • Wu’s experiment was shortly followed by another clever experiment by L. Lederman: Look at decay p+ m+nm • Pion has spin 0, m,nm both have spin ½  spin of decay products must be oppositely aligned  Helicity of muon is same as that of neutrino. • Nice feature: can also measure polarization of both neutrino (p+ decay) and anti-neutrino (p- decay) • Ledermans result: All neutrinos are left-handed and all anti-neutrinos are right-handed m+ nm p+ OK OK Niels Tuning (25)

26. Charge conjugation symmetry • Introducing C-symmetry • The C(harge) conjugation is the operation which exchanges particles and anti-particles (not just electric charge) • It is a discrete symmetry, just like P, i.e. C2 = 1 • C symmetry is broken by the weak interaction, • just like P OK m+ nm(LH) p+ C nm(LH) m- OK p- Niels Tuning (26)

27. Intrinsic spin The Weak force and C,P parity violation • What about C+P  CP symmetry? • CP symmetry is parity conjugation (x,y,z  -x,-y,z) followed by charge conjugation (X  X) +   P C CP appears to be preservedin weakinteraction! + +  +   CP Niels Tuning (27)

28. What do we know now? • C.S. Wu discovered from 60Co decays that the weak interaction is 100% asymmetric in P-conjugation • We can distinguish our universe from a parity flipped universe by examining 60Co decays • L. Lederman et al. discovered from π+ decays that the weak interaction is 100% asymmetric in C-conjugation as well, but that CP-symmetry appears to be preserved • First important ingredient towards understanding matter/anti-matter asymmetry of the universe: weak force violates matter/anti-matter(=C) symmetry! • C violation is a required ingredient, but not enough as we will learn later Niels Tuning (28)

29. Conserved properties associated with C and P • C and P are still good symmetries in any reaction not involving the weak interaction • Can associate a conserved value with them (Noether Theorem) • Each hadron has a conserved P and C quantum number • What are the values of the quantum numbers • Evaluate the eigenvalue of the P and C operators on each hadronP|y> = p|y> • What values of C and P are possible for hadrons? • Symmetry operation squared gives unity so eigenvalue squared must be 1 • Possible C and P values are +1 and -1. • Meaning of P quantum number • If P=1 then P|y> = +1|y> (wave function symmetric in space)if P=-1 then P|y> = -1 |y> (wave function anti-symmetric in space) Niels Tuning (29)

30. Figuring out P eigenvalues for hadrons • QFT rules for particle vs. anti-particles • Parity of particle and anti-particle must be opposite for fermions (spin-N+1/2) • Parity of bosons (spin N) is same for particle and anti-particle • Definition of convention (i.e. arbitrary choice in def. of q vs q) • Quarks have positive parity Anti-quarks have negative parity • e- has positive parity as well. • (Can define other way around: Notation different, physics same) • Parity is a multiplicative quantum number for composites • For composite AB the parity is P(A)*P(B), Thus: • Baryons have P=1*1*1=1, anti-baryons have P=-1*-1*-1=-1 • (Anti-)mesons have P=1*-1 = -1 • Excited states (with orbital angular momentum) • Get an extra factor (-1) l where l is the orbital L quantum number • Note that parity formalism is parallel to total angular momentum J=L+S formalism, it has an intrinsic component and an orbital component • NB: Photon is spin-1 particle has intrinsic P of -1 Niels Tuning (30)

31. Parity eigenvalues for selected hadrons • The p+ meson • Quark and anti-quark composite: intrinsic P = (1)*(-1) = -1 • Orbital ground state  no extra term • P(p+)=-1 • The neutron • Three quark composite: intrinsic P = (1)*(1)*(1) = 1 • Orbital ground state  no extra term • P(n) = +1 • The K1(1270) • Quark anti-quark composite: intrinsic P = (1)*(-1) = -1 • Orbital excitation with L=1  extra term (-1)1 • P(K1) = +1 • Experimental proof: J.Steinberger (1954) • πd→nn • n are fermions, so (nn) anti-symmetric • Sd=1, Sπ=0 → Lnn=1 • P|nn> = (-1)L|nn> = -1 |nn> • P|d> = P |pn> = (+1)2|pn> = +1 |d> • To conserve parity: P|π> = -1 |π> Meaning: P|p+> = -1|p+> Niels Tuning (31)

32. Figuring out C eigenvalues for hadrons • Only particles that are their own anti-particles are C eigenstates because C|x>  |x> = c|x> • E.g. p0,h,h’,r0,f,w,y and photon • C eigenvalues of quark-anti-quark pairs is determined by L and S angular momenta: C = (-1)L+S • Rule applies to all above mesons • C eigenvalue of photon is -1 • Since photon is carrier of EM force, which obviously changes sign under C conjugation • Example of C conservation: • Process p0 g g C=+1(p0 has spin 0)  (-1)*(-1) • Process p0  g g g does not occur (and would violate C conservation) Experimental proof of C-invariance: BR(π0→γγγ)<3.1 10-5 Niels Tuning (32)

33. This was an introduction to P and C • Let’s change gear… Niels Tuning (33)

34. uLI W+m g dLI CP violation in the SM Lagrangian • Focus on charged current interaction (W±): let’s trace it Niels Tuning (34)

35. The Standard Model Lagrangian • LKinetic :• Introduce the massless fermion fields • • Require local gauge invariance  gives rise to existence of gauge bosons • LHiggs :• Introduce Higgs potential with <f> ≠ 0 • • Spontaneous symmetry breaking The W+, W-,Z0 bosons acquire a mass • LYukawa :• Ad hoc interactions between Higgs field & fermions Niels Tuning (35)

36. Fields: Notation Interaction rep. Hypercharge Y (=avg el.charge in multiplet) SU(3)C SU(2)L Left- handed generation index Y = Q - T3 Fermions: with y = QL, uR, dR, LL, lR, nR Quarks: Under SU2: Left handed doublets Right hander singlets Leptons: Scalar field: Note: Interaction representation: standard model interaction is independent of generation number Niels Tuning (36)

37. Fields: Notation Q = T3 + Y Y = Q - T3 Explicitly: • The left handed quark doublet : • Similarly for the quark singlets: • The left handed leptons: • And similarly the (charged) singlets: Niels Tuning (37)

38. :The Kinetic Part : Fermions + gauge bosons + interactions Procedure: Introduce the Fermion fields and demand that the theory is local gauge invariant under SU(3)CxSU(2)LxU(1)Y transformations. Start with the Dirac Lagrangian: Replace: Gam :8 gluons Wbm: weak bosons: W1, W2, W3 Bm: hyperchargeboson Fields: Generators: La : Gell-Mann matrices: ½ la(3x3) SU(3)C Tb : Pauli Matrices: ½ tb (2x2) SU(2)L Y : Hypercharge: U(1)Y For the remainder we only consider Electroweak: SU(2)L x U(1)Y Niels Tuning (38)

39. : The Kinetic Part uLI W+m g dLI For example, the term with QLiIbecomes: Writing out only the weak part for the quarks: W+ = (1/√2) (W1+ i W2) W- = (1/√ 2) (W1– i W2) L=JmWm Niels Tuning (39)

40. : The Higgs Potential Broken Symmetry V(f) V(f) Symmetry f f ~ 246 GeV Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking: The Higgs field adopts a non-zero vacuum expectation value Substitute: Procedure: • . • The W+,W-,Z0 bosons acquire mass • The Higgs boson H appears And rewrite the Lagrangian (tedious): (The other 3 Higgs fields are “eaten” by the W, Z bosons) Niels Tuning (40)

41. : The Yukawa Part doublets singlet Since we have a Higgs field we can (should?) add (ad-hoc) interactions between f and the fermions in a gauge invariant way. The result is: ~ i, j : indices for the 3 generations! With: (The CP conjugate of f To be manifestly invariant under SU(2) ) are arbitrary complex matrices which operate in family space (3x3)  Flavour physics! Niels Tuning (41)

42. : The Yukawa Part Writing the first term explicitly: Niels Tuning (42)

43. : The Yukawa Part There are 3 Yukawa matrices (in the case of massless neutrino’s): • Each matrix is 3x3 complex: • 27 real parameters • 27 imaginary parameters (“phases”) • many of the parameters are equivalent, since the physics described by one set of couplings is the same as another • It can be shown (see ref. [Nir]) that the independent parameters are: • 12 real parameters • 1 imaginary phase • This single phase is the source of all CP violation in the Standard Model ……Revisit later Niels Tuning (43)

44. : The Fermion Masses S.S.B Start with the Yukawa Lagrangian After which the following mass term emerges: with LMass is CP violating in a similar way as LYuk Niels Tuning (44)

45. : The Fermion Masses S.S.B dLI , uLI , lLIare the weak interaction eigenstates dL , uL , lLare the mass eigenstates (“physical particles”) Writing in an explicit form: The matrices M can always be diagonalised by unitarymatricesVLfandVRfsuch that: Then the real fermion mass eigenstates are given by: Niels Tuning (45)

46. : The Fermion Masses S.S.B In terms of the mass eigenstates: In flavour space one can choose: Weak basis: The gauge currents are diagonal in flavour space, but the flavour mass matrices are non-diagonal Mass basis: The fermion masses are diagonal, but some gauge currents (charged weak interactions) are not diagonal in flavour space In the weak basis: LYukawa = CP violating In the mass basis: LYukawa → LMass= CP conserving  What happened to the charged current interactions (in LKinetic) ? Niels Tuning (46)

47. : The Charged Current The charged current interaction for quarks in the interaction basis is: The charged current interaction for quarks in the mass basis is: The unitary matrix: With: is the Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa mixing matrix: Lepton sector: similarly However, for massless neutrino’s: VLn= arbitrary. Choose it such that VMNS = 1 There is no mixing in the lepton sector Niels Tuning (47)

48. Charged Currents The charged current term reads: Under the CP operator this gives: (Together with (x,t) -> (-x,t)) A comparison shows that CP is conserved only ifVij = Vij* In general the charged current term is CP violating Niels Tuning (48)

49. The Standard Model Lagrangian (recap) • LKinetic : •Introduce the massless fermion fields • •Require local gauge invariance  gives rise to existence of gauge bosons  CP Conserving • LHiggs : •Introduce Higgs potential with <f> ≠ 0 • •Spontaneous symmetry breaking The W+, W-,Z0 bosons acquire a mass  CP Conserving • LYukawa : •Ad hoc interactions between Higgs field & fermions  CP violating with a single phase • LYukawa → Lmass : • fermion weak eigenstates: • - mass matrix is (3x3) non-diagonal • • fermion mass eigenstates: • - mass matrix is (3x3) diagonal  CP-violating  CP-conserving! • LKinetic in mass eigenstates: CKM – matrix  CP violating with a single phase Niels Tuning (49)

50. Recap • Diagonalize Yukawa matrix Yij • Mass terms • Quarks rotate • Off diagonal terms in charged current couplings Niels Tuning (50)