390 likes | 818 Views
Pain Sucks: . An evidence based guide to analgesia Updated January 22nd, 2009 Joe Vipond. Clinical Scenarios. 1) a 23 y.o. Male with multiple facial contusions and a broken nose. He is to follow up with ENT in 10 days. Analgesia?
E N D
Pain Sucks: An evidence based guide to analgesia Updated January 22nd, 2009 Joe Vipond
Clinical Scenarios 1) a 23 y.o. Male with multiple facial contusions and a broken nose. He is to follow up with ENT in 10 days. Analgesia? 2) An 87 y.o. female with a knee strain. Xray reveals no acute fracture but +++OA. Analgesia?
Objectives 1) Knowledge of the evidence of efficacy of the commonly used analgesics -Oxford League Table -what it means -its strengths and weakness 2) An understanding of benefits and harms of NSAID use -Side effects -Effect on Bone healing 3) An understanding of benefits and harms of combination analgesia -Acetaminophen with codeine -Acetaminophen with Ibuprofen 4) An understanding of the current knowledge on topical NSAIDs
The Oxford League Table • From Bandolier: evidence-based reviews with an interest in pain • www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/painpag • Comparison versus placebo in randomised, double-blind, single dose studies in patients with moderate to severe pain • Generally, studies are on post op patients (dental, tonsillectomy)
Oxford Table (Continued) NNT- Proportion of patients with at least 50% pain relief over 4-6 hours compared with placebo
NNT (cont’d) What about the validity of the results? Compare with….
GI risks of NSAIDs Risk of gastric lesions: < 2 weeks 3.6% > 4 weeks 6.8% Risk of duodenal lesions: < 2 weeks 3.0% > 4 weeks 4.0% Koch M, Dezi A, Ferrario F, Capurso L. Prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996 156: 2321-32.
Risk factors for NSAID bleeds • 8843 men and women w/ RA taking NSAIDS • mean age 68 years • Placebo 1.4% GI Events over six months • 4 major risk factors: age>75, hx of PUD, hx GI Bleed, hx CHF • Risk of GI Bleed related to number of risk factors • none: 0.8% • one: 2% • three :8-10% • four : 18% • FE Silverstein, DY Graham, JR Senior et al. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Annals of Internal Medicine 1995 123:241-9.
Use of GI protectants? • Misoprostol group 0.8% incidence • NNT of 83 • NNH of 20 (diarrhea, abdominal pain, and flatulence) • note that NNT decreases as risk of bleed increases: if initial risk is 18%, NNT is 12.8. • H2 receptor blockers do not seem to be very effective • Omeprazole may be even better than misoprostol • two studies looking at existing ulcers in people needing to take NSAIDs • NNT of 3.0 vs. 5.8 for misoprostol • 14 CJ Hawkey, JA Karrasch, L Szczepanki et al. Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 1998 338: 727-34. 15 ND Yeomans, Z Tulassay, L Juhasz et al. A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 1998 338: 791-26.
Which NSAID sucks the most? 7 TM MacDonald, SV Morant, GC Robinson et al. Association of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with continued exposure: cohort study. British Medical Journal 1997 315: 1333-7. 12 D Henry, L Lim, L Garcia Rodriguez et al. Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a collaborative meta-analysis. British Medical Journal 1996 312: 1563-6. 13 LA Garcia Rodriguez et al. Risk of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding associated with ketorolac, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, calcium antagonists, and other antihypertensive drugs. Archives of Internal Medicine 1998 158: 33-39.
More evidence Dose–response relationships between individual nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) and serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis based on individual patient dataBr J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 September; 54(3): 320–326.
NSAID effect on bone healing? • NSAIDs affect healing in rabbits • No effect on Colles fractures • P Adolphson et al. No effects of piroxicam on osteopenia and recovery after Colles' fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993 112: 127-130. • IM Ketorolac decreases fusion rates in spinal fusion surgery (esp. with smoking) • SD Glassman et al. The effect of postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration on spinal fusion. Spine 1998 23: 834-838. • Case control study suggesting increased non-union with femur fractures • PV Giannoudis et al. Nonunion of the femoral diaphysis. The influence of reaming and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000 82: 655-658. • ? Increased non-union with indomethacin use to prevent heterotopic bone formation • PV Giannoudis et al. Nonunion of the femoral diaphysis. The influence of reaming and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000 82: 655-658.
Side effects of T#3s? • Table 2--Frequency of side effects in studies of paracetamol-codeine combinations versus paracetamol alone • Single dose studies (n = 15) RELATIVE RATE • No of patients reporting >/=1 event 484 488 1.1 (0.8 to 1.5) • No with adverse reaction 116 100 • No of events: • Dizziness 14 11 • Drowsiness 39 35 • Nausea 18 17 • Vomiting 6 7 • Other 43 41 • Multidose studies (n = 3) • No of patients reporting >/=1 event 307 164 2.5 (1.5 to 4.2) • No with adverse reaction 122 37 • No of events: • Dizziness 42 2 • Drowsiness 12 2 • Nausea 69 9 • Vomiting 19 3 • Constipation 17 7 • Other 90 38 • de Craen AJM, Di Giulio G, Lampe-Schoenmaeckers AJE, Kessels AGH, Kleijnen J. Analgesic efficacy and safety of paracetamol-codeine combinations versus paracetamol alone: A systematic review. British Medical Journal 1996; 313:321-325.
And Tramadol? NNH for Vomiting for 100mg: approx 12
NSAIDs and Acetaminophen • Frequently used • ?evidence • Two reviews in 2002 • Rømsing J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Rectal and parenteral paracetamol, and paracetamol in combination with NSAIDs, for postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 215–26 • Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 199–214 • Evidence suggests combining NSAID with Acetaminophen better than acetaminophen alone, but perhaps not the opposite • neither were formal quantitative reviews • both suggested quality of the studies were inadequate to give adequate data
Ibuprofen and Oxycodone • Combination oxycodone 5mg/ibuprofen 400 mg for the treatment of pain after abdominal or pelvic surgery in women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo and active controlled parallel-group study Clin Ther 2005 Jan ;27(1):45-57 • Combination significantly better, than ibuprofen (12 vs ibuprofen 10 vs oxycodone 8 vs placebo 6) • Also less adverse events (55% placebo vs. 44% oxycodone vs 42% ibuprofen 40% combination)
Ibuprofen and Oxycodone cont’d • Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of oxycodone 5 mg/ibuprofen 400mg compared with those of oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg and hydrocodone 7.5 mg/acetaminophen 500mg in patients with moderate to severe post-op pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-dose, parallel group study in a dental pain model Clin Ther 2005 Apr;27(4):418-29 • Totpar 15 vs. perc 9.5, dilaudid 8.3 placebo 5.5 • Also fewer adverse events (50%, and similar to placebo) • Suggestion of some anti-emetic effect of ibuprofen
Ibuprofen/oxycodone in children • Single study: Effectiveness of oxycodone, ibuprofen or the combination in the initial mangement or orthopedic injury-related pain in children Paed Emerg Care 2007 sep 23(9): 627-33 • No sign. Difference in effectiveness • Increased adverse effects in combination group
Topical NSAIDs • Controversial: geographical variance in use is HUGE • variability in skin penetrance • diclofenac is reasonable at 11% • Tissue concentrations much higher than serum concentrations
Clinical Effectiveness -systemic review of topical NSAIDs in Acute Pain L Mason et al. Topical NSAIDs for acute pain: a metaanalysis.BMC Family Practice 2004 5:10
Effectiveness (cont’d) AA Bookman et al. Effect of a topical diclofenac solution for relieving symptoms of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled study. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004 171: 333-338. SH Roth, JZ Shainhouse. Efficacy and safety of a topical diclofenac solution (Pennsaid) in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee. Archives of Internal Medicine 2004 164: 2017-2023. PS Tugwell et al. Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution (PENNSAID) compared with oral diclofenac in the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Rheumatology 2004 31: 2002-2012.
Clinical Scenarios 1) a 23 y.o. Male with multiple facial contusions and a broken nose. He is to follow up with ENT in 10 days. Analgesia? 2) An 87 y.o. female with a knee strain. Xray reveals no acute fracture but +++OA. Analgesia?
Summary • The Oxford table is an imperfect but helpful guide to analgesic efficacy. • NSAIDs, overall, are more effective than Acetaminophen. Ibuprofen Tops! • Omeprazole may help decrease GI bleeding with NSAIDs. • The overall efficacy of APAP/Codeine is suspect. • Topical NSAIDs may be a reasonable NSAID alternative.
Summary (cont’d) • Acetaminophen/NSAID combination therapy: evidence not there yet….