1 / 29

“Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

“Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”. 57.3 % of subjects believe that the problem with the corruption in higher education is not controlled by the concerned authorities. Admissions. “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”.

albany
Download Presentation

“Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

  2. 57.3 % of subjects believe that the problem with the corruption in higher education is not controlled by the concerned authorities

  3. Admissions “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

  4. 76,7 % of students have heard about illegal ways of admission • 38,4 % believe that in their faculties there are possibilities to bypass the official selection process • 41 % of students are considered to have used illegal methods of admission at the faculties • 39,9% of subjects have colleagues and friends who bypassed the official selection process

  5. The most frequent methods of illegal admission A possibility for admission test scores to be illegally changed? 36.1% Case of illegal activities concerning students ranked in the admissions list (such as improper rearrangement of the list)? 17.5% Any illegal change in the quotas of those who pay and don’t pay? ? 32.4% Exam used for an admission that is received as a part of being tutored by a University professor? 36.6% Criteria in admissions tests used for admitting students who can bribe? 37.9%

  6. 12.5% have been in a situation of buying the admission exam • 5.6% accepted the offer made by mediator, professor, colleague, administrator invoking reasons like: • To pass my exams • Because everybody else did it • To get better results • To receive a scholarship (to be a budget student) • It was easier this way • 3.3% didn’t accept the offer because: • Because I trust my knowledge • It is against my principles • I was sure that I am able to pass the exams with my own forces • I was not sure about the success • I did not have the necessary amount

  7. The reasons of not reporting he corrupted person are: • I didn’t consider this as necessary • It could have caused me troubles • It was for my own use • The competent bodies are not able of solving anything • He/she is a good friend • I did not know whom to turn to

  8. 3,8% of subjects have bypassed the official selection process by: • Offering money to the teacher • Paying the dean • Buying the admission exams • Through particular hours • Through intermediaries

  9. 22.5% would agreed to be illegally accepted in the faculty knowing that they wouldn’t be caught • The acceptable penalties if they were caught in an illegal admission activity: • Expulsion and the rigorous verification the next time during the admission exams • Penalty by doubling/tripling the paid amount • Any penalties is not acceptable • To punish both parties according to the law • Repeating the year / no admission at any other university during that year • Harsh reproof • No scholarship and payment of the contract • I would not avoid it • Not to allow to continue the studies at that university

  10. 13.000 students in Moldova have been in a situation of buying an admission exam. 6.000 of them have accepted the offer. • 24.000 students would not mind to be admitted at the university using some illegal method, if they will not be caught.

  11. Grades “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

  12. 46% of subjects have heard about bribing for exams • 44.5% of students from the faculty are considered to be corrupted • 28% of subjects have paid for exams or grades • 29% have paid for passing an exam

  13. 30.6% would offer a bribe to pass an exam or to receive a certain grade • 58.2% would offer bribe for an exam, if you they don't see any other chance of passing

  14. 55.6 % of subjects believe that in their faculty there are professors abusing their right to examine openly in order to ease or help certain students • 46.5% of subjects consider that in their faculty there are professors making their examinations more difficult in order to get a bribe

  15. 18.3 % would report if they heard about case of bribing for taking an exam to: • Dean – 7.2% • Students’ organizations– 4.9% • Administration – 3.5% • Police – 2.2% • 64.6% wouldn’t report because • Denunciation of one single case would not change anything • I am afraid of the consequences • It is only about the people who take and give bribe • I can not prove it • The teachers are to blame • It is not correct related to my colleagues • Maybe I will give bribe someday too • I do not want to look ridiculous • I do not know whom to address • Teachers take bribe to survive, due to the law salaries

  16. The attitude of the student’s parents position towards giving bribe is the following: • They are totally against – 45.7 % • They do not know about bribe and do not give anything – 11% • They give me money to bribe, if I don’t pass exams or to get higher marks – 8.6% • They would be ready to bribe – 6,8% • I am not interested in their opinion – 5.3% • They do not give money to me, but take bribing as something normal – 3.4% • They are indifferent towards it – 2% • They suggest me to bribe – 2.0%

  17. 75% of subjects do not know the penalties for a professor who takes bribes from students • 79.2% of subjects do not know the penalties for a student who offers bribes to professors

  18. Administration “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

  19. 21,6 % from respondents have heard about different cases of corruption in their universities administration ?Bribing during exam period – 32,4% ?Admission – 10,6% ?Accommodation in students’ hostels – 7,4% ?Different cases – 6% ?Passing to the budget, on the account of the people who take an academic leave – 1,4% ?Expulsion (bribing for keeping the student status) – 1,4% ?Job repartition – 0,5% ?Absences from classes – 0,5% ?Scholarships – 0,5%

  20. 58,4 %of respondents consider that students that live in a dormitory, have paid or done a favor or given a gift to a member of the administration in order to get the place in the dorm 69,2 % consider a university administrator to be a profitable job

  21. Textbooks “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

  22. 31,9 %bought a textbook created by the professor as a condition of passing an exam • 90,75 % of respondents consider text books that the professor insisted to buy totally useless and • 0.3 % consider that it turned to be useful lately

  23. Cheating “Corruption in Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova”

  24. 21,4 % of respondents assured that they have never cheated • Cribs, paper notes, small-sized notebook – 24,7% • Different / a lot – 9,9% • From the notebook / manual – 6,2% • The teacher has to allow it – 1,7% • From the colleagues – 1,3 • Depends on the exam – 0,8%

More Related