110 likes | 209 Views
Logo of institution. [ Five-Year ] Review of [ Institute Name ]([ Country ]) Quality Management System in Support of CMCs for [ Quantities ]. Presented by: Date:. Objective. Seeking SIM QSTF acceptance or re-acceptance for QMS in support of CMCs in the area of Metrology/quantities
E N D
Logo of institution [Five-Year] Review of [Institute Name]([Country]) Quality Management System in Support of CMCs for [Quantities] Presented by: Date:
Objective Seeking SIM QSTF acceptanceor re-acceptance for QMS in support of CMCs in the area of Metrology/quantities Based on self declaration, peer review, or accreditation
Quality Management System Short statement about the scope and structure of the QMS and the quality policy
Organization chart Showing the laboratory under review as part of the overall organization Indicating independence of the quality manager Changes to the QMS (for 5-year reviews)
Management of QMS Internal audits • dates • assessors - indicating independence of internal auditors (org chart may be helpful) • key findings • management of non-conformances (show table of NCs, action plans, action items (with dates for completion), indicate open or closed items
Management of QMS Management review • dates • participants/attendees • topics or agenda items • findings and actions
Management of QMS Peer review or assessment • dates • assessors/reviewers (indicate independence of assessors - for NMIs having prior approval) • key findings • management of non-conformances (show table of NCs, action plans, action items (with dates for completion), indicate open or closed items
Management of QMS Complaints and non-conforming work statistics and trend analysis action items corrections and corrective actions
Management of QMS This slide required for 5-year reviews only Vitality information • Intercomparisons • Key achievements and training • Improvements to services • Changes to staff, equipment, infrastructure/lab, etc.
Significant changes This slide required for 5-year reviews only If applicable, significant changes to: • Capabilities • Uncertainties • Accreditation status