220 likes | 602 Views
Chapter 24. OPIOID RECEPTORS. Receptor Theories. Beckett-Casy hypothesis * Single opioid receptor interacts with morphine * Ionic binding region (CO 2 - ) interacts with positive N + * Hydrophobic binding region interacts with aromatic ring * Hydrogen bonding region interacts with phenol
E N D
Chapter 24 OPIOID RECEPTORS
Receptor Theories Beckett-Casy hypothesis * Single opioid receptor interacts with morphine * Ionic binding region (CO2-) interacts with positive N+ * Hydrophobic binding region interacts with aromatic ring * Hydrogen bonding region interacts with phenol * Hollow region accepts carbon bridge (C-15 and C-16)
Ionic binding region VdW binding region Hydrogen bond binding region RECEPTOR
SCAFFOLD RECEPTOR
Receptor Theories Drawbacks with the Beckett-Casy hypothesis * Ethylene bridge is not important in some analgesics (fentanyl) * No account for extra binding regions found by extension * Does not explain different SAR results (e.g. meperidine vs morphine) * Does not explain mixed antagonist/agonist properties
Receptor Theories Multiple Analgesic Receptors * Three different analgesic receptors (mu, kappa and delta) * Binding sites for all three receptors contain ionic, hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic regions as proposed by Beckett-Casy * Activation of all three produce analgesia, but differ in other effects * All three interact with morphine * Potential to target drugs selectively
Mu Receptor (m) * Morphine binds strongly * Activation produces analgesia plus side effects (respiratory depression, euphoria, addiction) * G-Protein coupled receptor * m-Receptor subtypes identified which may allow separation of analgesia from side effects * m-Receptors related to all sources of pain stimuli
Kappa Receptor (k) * Morphine binds less strongly * Activation produces analgesia plus sedation * Insignificant side effects * Potential target for safe analgesics (compounds acting as agonists at k, antagonists at m and no activity at the d receptor). * G-Protein-coupled receptor * k Receptors related to non-thermal pain induced stimuli
Delta Receptor (d) * Morphine binds strongly * Receptor for enkephalins * Activation produces analgesia plus some side effects * G-Protein-linked receptor * d receptors related to pain induced stimuli from all sources
Sigma Receptor (s) * Activated by some opoid analgesics (e.g. nalorphine) * Non-analgesic, non-opoid receptor * Activation produces hallucinogenic effects * Thought to be responsible for effects of phencyclidine (PCP) (Angel Dust)
Main effects of opioids at opioid receptors Blue = Agonist (Blue) = Partial agonist Red = Antagonist
Agonists vs Antagonists * Why should small changes in structure (e.g. N-methyl to N-allyl) change an agonist to an antagonist at a specific receptor? * Proposed that specific receptors have additional hydrophobic binding regions which lead to agonist or antagonist activity.
H-Bond Hydrophobic Antagonist hydrophobic region Ionic Agonist hydrophobic region Binding Regions
HO HO HO O O O .. .. N N N Me .. Me HO HO HO Binding Modes for Morphine Morphine incapable of reaching either of the extra hydrophobic regions
HO O N .. HO Binding Modes for N-Phenethylmorphine Pure agonist with enhanced activity
HO HO O O .. N N .. HO HO Binding Modes for N-Phenethylmorphine antagonist region agonist region • Aromatic ring pushed beyond antagonist region • Correct distance to bind to agonist region
HO HO HO O O O .. .. N N N .. HO HO HO Binding Modes for N-Allylmorphine antagonist region agonist region • Allyl group binds well to the antagonist region • Allyl group forms a weak interaction with the agonist region • Antagonist with weak agonist properties
HO HO O O O .. .. N N N OH OH .. HO HO Steric Clash HO Influence of a 14-OH Group
HO HO O O O .. .. N N N OH OH .. HO HO Steric Clash HO Influence of 14-OH Group Pure antagonist