300 likes | 468 Views
My-Peer Best practice standards for youth peer support programs 9 October 2008. My-Peer. Presented by: Roanna Lobo Graham Brown Western Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research, Curtin University of Technology. Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute.
E N D
My-Peer Best practice standards for youth peer support programs9 October 2008
My-Peer Presented by: Roanna Lobo Graham Brown Western Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research, Curtin University of Technology Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute
Acknowledgments The My-Peer project is supported by Lotterywest and Healthway.
Overall aims of My-Peer To promote the long term sustainability of youth peer support programs. To develop field-tested best practice standards for the design, implementation and evaluation of peer support programs for mental health promotion.
Young people's mental health 1 in 4 young people will experience a depressive disorder during adolescence1 75% of mental health disorders begin before the age of 252 Yet 70% young people who experience mental health problems don't seek help Early intervention and prevention are very important 1 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Young Australians: their health and wellbeing, Canberra, 2007 2 www.headspace.org.au
Young people's mental health Adolescents are highly influenced by their peers Peer group acceptance and healthy peer relationships are important predictors of good mental health Not all young people experience positive peer relationships Many young people can feel isolated, desperate and alone
Peer support A type of informal social or psychological support Peers share equal status Through meeting others facing similar issues, or in similar predicaments, young people can build: Resilience/coping strategies Connectedness Problem solving skills A sense of possibility
Peer support programs (PSPs) Promote positive mental health through: Peer influence – giving or receiving support Active involvement of young people Strengths-focused approaches Early intervention Youth friendly settings
PSPs are particularly effective for Hard to reach groups Marginalised youth Youth out of school At risk or vulnerable youth Young people who do not actively seek help
Characteristics of PSPs Safe environment Acceptance Supportive/non-judgmental Opportunity to meet peers in similar situations facing common issues Confidentiality/anonymity Experiential learning
Associated benefits Cognitive/behavioural change Peer support Provide hope Friendships/social networking Service information Personal development
Freedom Centre Drop-in centre for lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans* youth Safe space Anonymity and confidentiality Peer support and specialist referrals Educational programs Online support services too
Peer Support Program 5 week program including weekend camp For youth at risk of depression, suicide or self harm Complements therapeutic services Peer support Opportunity to practise social skills Personal development
Talking Realities Peer educator training program for pregnant or parenting teenage girls aged 14-19 Peer support Assistance to finish education or gain employment
Gone Fishing Fishing skills program for lonely or isolated youth Opportunity to interact with seniors and peers Opportunity to make friends with other peers who enjoy fishing Active leisure pursuit
Ongoing challenges for PSPs Funding Collecting evidence of effectiveness Incremental change, not a quick fix Sustainability Often dependent on volunteers/highly committed staff members or individuals Scarce resources
The need for sustainability “We know we're doing something right. We need to be able to say what and why” (agency) “If it wasn't for this program I wouldn't be here today” (young person) “This is the only place I feel safe. I don't have any other friends” (young person)
The need for evidence and standards Funding and sustainability Service improvement Implementing best practice – efficient use of scarce resources Duty of care/ethical issues re youth participation Staff morale/retention Knowledge sharing
My-Peer project objectives Best practice standards for PSPs Field tested resources Evaluation methods/tools/approaches suitable for PSP contexts Best practice models for sustainability Capacity building within agencies
Pilot work completed 2005-2006 Framework defining the role of PSPs in mental health promotion. 2007-2008 Range of evaluation tools and strategies tested within Freedom Centre. Active involvement of young people and peer volunteers in design and testing.
My-Peer project design Action research Diverse range of PSPs and agencies Identify best practice models/success factors Identify suitable indicators for measuring effectiveness of PSPs Develop and test evaluation tools 12 month duration (Nov 2008 start)
Project challenges Youth friendly tools Knowledge/skills of staff Suitable indicators for hard to measure long term outcomes, e.g. emotional wellbeing Time and resource constraints within agencies
Discussion What issues do you face running youth programs? Which areas are hardest to show evidence that programs are effective? What resources would assist? What format should these take? Keen to get feedback right at the start of the project
Interest group Do you run a PSP? Feel you could benefit from the My-Peer resources? Like to be kept updated on the My-Peer project? Interested in giving feedback on draft standards? Sign up to join the My-Peer interest group today!
My-Peer website For more information and to access further resources, please visit the My-Peer website at: http://www.wachpr.curtin.edu.au/mypeer
Contact details Ms Roanna Lobo, My-Peer Project Manager roanna.lobo@curtin.edu.au Tel: 08 9266 7242 (Direct) Dr Graham Brown, My-Peer Project Director g.brown@curtin.edu.au Tel: 08 9266 2751 (Direct)