1 / 18

TURNING LEEDS INTO A HUMBOLDTIAN UNIVERSITY: HOW RESEARCH SHOULD INFORM TEACHING

TURNING LEEDS INTO A HUMBOLDTIAN UNIVERSITY: HOW RESEARCH SHOULD INFORM TEACHING. George MacDonald Ross PRS Subject Centre Leeds L&T Conference, 08.01.10. Programme. Some history Some politics Some facts Two ways of linking R&T. When did HE become research-led?. Not for Cardinal Newman

Download Presentation

TURNING LEEDS INTO A HUMBOLDTIAN UNIVERSITY: HOW RESEARCH SHOULD INFORM TEACHING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TURNING LEEDS INTO A HUMBOLDTIAN UNIVERSITY: HOW RESEARCH SHOULD INFORM TEACHING George MacDonald Ross PRS Subject Centre Leeds L&T Conference, 08.01.10

  2. Programme • Some history • Some politics • Some facts • Two ways of linking R&T University of Leeds

  3. When did HE become research-led? • Not for Cardinal Newman • Lecturers and doctors teach • Research mission gradual in UK (discouraged at Leeds early 1900s) • Disciplinary differences • Mid 20th century • US teaching-only colleges University of Leeds

  4. Why an issue? • Unis funded better than polys • RAE called bluff of unis • Post 1992 almost all unis have research mission • Present government wants to recreate binary divide • Important to defend research-led teaching University of Leeds

  5. Do prolific researchers teach better? • Academics generally say yes • Government says no • Research evidence finds no correlation • Some apriori considerations pro and con: University of Leeds

  6. Pro • HE is higher because it is cutting-edge • The next generation of researchers must be educated by researchers • Good teaching requires at least up-to-date scholarship University of Leeds

  7. Con (1) • Researchers may neglect teaching • Outcomes of research may be too difficult for UGs • Few UGs proceed to research (the mission of a university is not self-replication) University of Leeds

  8. Con (2) • Most teaching is outside one’s research specialism, and non-experts can be good teachers • The RAE forces artificial split between R&T • Rewards for T excellence reinforce the split – should be rewards for linkage University of Leeds

  9. Linking T&R • Two broad approaches: • Tell students about your research • Treat students as fellow researchers University of Leeds

  10. Telling about • Probably what is understood by most people • Good if achievable • But likely to be too difficult • Students aren’t learning how to research University of Leeds

  11. Teaching how • Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767-1835): Students as apprenticed researchers • For example: • Laboratory practicals • Field trips • Case studies • Dissertations and projects University of Leeds

  12. Advantages • We’re doing some of it already (but should do much more) • Active learning rather than absorption and regurgitation • Teachers know how to research, but their research needn’t be front-line University of Leeds

  13. Disadvantages • Less material can be covered (but less means more?) • Doesn’t justify front-line research in teaching institutions • Difficult to implement with diminishing resources University of Leeds

  14. Conclusion • The Humboldtian ideal is the best way forward • The priority should be to develop cost-effective ways of achieving it in different disciplines University of Leeds

  15. References (1) • John Henry Newman, The Idea of a University (New York, Longmans, 1947). • Wilhelm von Humboldt, “On the spirit and organisational framework of intellectual institutions in Berlin”, Minerva VIII.2, April 1970, 242-267. University of Leeds

  16. References (2) • J. Hattie and H.W. Marsh, “The relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis”, Review of Educational Research 66 (4), 1996, 507-542. • A. Jenkins, M. Healey and R. Zetter, Linking teaching and research in the disciplines and departments (York, The Higher Education Academy, 2007). University of Leeds

  17. References (3) • G. MacDonald Ross, Kant on Teaching Philosophy, in Discourse: Learning and Teaching in Philosophical and Religious Studies 5/1, Autumn 2005, 65–82 • Other publications at: http://www.philosophy.leeds.ac.uk/GMR/index.html University of Leeds

  18. Thank you for participating George MacDonald Ross Senior Adviser Subject Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies of the Higher Education Academy University of Leeds

More Related