1 / 16

Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres

Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres. Summary: Patrick Wilkinson Critique: James Silva. Overview. Introduction to Industrial Metabolism The Materials Cycle Measures of Industrial Metabolism Policy Implications of the Industrial Metabolism Perspective.

alec-nieves
Download Presentation

Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Industrial Metabolism:Theory and PolicyRobert U. Ayres Summary: Patrick Wilkinson Critique: James Silva

  2. Overview • Introduction to Industrial Metabolism • The Materials Cycle • Measures of Industrial Metabolism • Policy Implications of the Industrial Metabolism Perspective

  3. Introduction to Industrial Metabolism • Definition: “the whole integrated collection of physical processes that convert raw materials and energy, plus labor, into finished products and wastes in a (more or less) steady-state condition.” • Metabolism: Analogous to the process of a living organism • Takes in food for self/storage and excretes wastes. • Differences: • Organisms reproduce themselves, specialized, change over long period of time. • Firms produce products or services, not specialized, can change quickly

  4. The Materials Cycle • Closed cycles are self-sustaining with no external sources or sinks and are in steady state. • Open cycles are unsustainable, using materials without replenishing sources. • Must stabilize or will ultimately fail • The Biological cycle is a closed cycle, while our industrial cycle is an open cycle.

  5. The Material Cycle • “Industrial system of today”: Unsustainable • Can this stabilization be obtained with a “technological ‘fix’”? • If so, how? • If not, how long will the current system last? • Biological system • Has not always been a closed system • “Responded to inherently unstable situations (open cycles) by ‘inventing’ new processes (organisms) to stabilize the system by closing the cycles.” • Time scales • Biological system took billions of years • Industrial system does not have that much time

  6. Measures of Industrial Metabolism • Recycling and dissipative loss are the “fates” of all waste materials • There are 3 classes of materials use • Those that are recyclable under present technology and cost • Those that are recyclable, but not under present tech. and cost • Those that are not recyclable • For the industrial system to function as a closed cycle, it must recycle or reuse nearly all materials

  7. Measures of Industrial Metabolism • Examples of dissipative use: Class 3 materials • Sulfur • CFC’s • Ammonia • Phosphoric acid • Chlorine • Although can be classified as class 2 when used in plastics and solvents

  8. Measures of Industrial Metabolism • Potentially recyclable materials • Are they being recycled and reused? • Recycle (reuse) vs. Dissipation of a material shows how far sustainability is from being reached

  9. Policy Implications of the Industrial Metabolism Perspective • Industrial metabolism is “holistic” in theory • All interactions are considered together resulting in the best for the system as a whole • Short term solutions and policies, however, are being enforced • Such policies are usually more harmful and costly in the long run • Ex.’s Pollution and coal as a fuel • Air and water pollution reduced, but land disposal increased • Clean coal technology could extend coal as fuel, but effects of byproducts extended as well

  10. Critique • Sulfur Example • Comparison: human vs. natural • Material Source vs. Material Path • A more “holistic view”

  11. Sulfur Example • Example of Dissipative use • Nearly all sulfur mined is dissipated or discarded • Mostly used for sulfuric acid – used in non-recyclable chemicals • Thus sulfur mainly falls into the third category • But… plaster-of Paris

  12. Comparison: human vs. natural • Where is the natural to compare with the anthropogenic? • What are the percentages referring to? • “In all cases, with the possible exception of nitrogen, the anthropogenic contributions exceed the natural flows by a considerable margin.” • Really?

  13. Comparison: human vs. natural (Can you interpret this?)

  14. Material Source vs. Material Path • Should be less concerned with how much of something is left than with what path used material takes • How much oil/steel/etc. is left to be extracted from natural sources is not a good measure of evaluation for industrial processes • A better way is to quantify how much recycling of material is going on: What do we do with what we use?

  15. A more “holistic view” • Defines it more by what it is not • Contrasts with “narrowly conceived or short-run (myopic) ‘quick fix’ policies” • Longer pipelines for sewage • Air vs. water vs. land • Not an in-depth application paper • Less than 15 pages • The industrial system of tomorrow…?

  16. Questions?

More Related