1 / 22

LAFCO reports analyzed the viability of the San Fernando Valley and Hollywood as separate cities.

LAFCO reports analyzed the viability of the San Fernando Valley and Hollywood as separate cities. The Rose Institute report examines key factors in municipal decision making: State Subventions Federal Subventions Sales Tax Redevelopment Police Expenditure

aleda
Download Presentation

LAFCO reports analyzed the viability of the San Fernando Valley and Hollywood as separate cities.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LAFCO reports analyzed the viability of the San Fernando Valley and Hollywood as separate cities. • The Rose Institute report examines key factors in municipal decision making: • State Subventions • Federal Subventions • Sales Tax • Redevelopment • Police Expenditure • These factors are put in relative context for the 88 cities in Los Angeles County and for selected California cities.

  2. State Subventions compared on a per capita basis. • Compared to the 87 other cities in Los Angeles County: • City of Los Angeles ranks 19th for FY 1996-1997 • City of Los Angeles ranks 27th for FY 1997-1998 • City of Los Angeles ranks 38th for FY 1998-1999 • City of Los Angeles ranks 6th out of the 7 major California cities compared.

  3. Federal Subventions compared on a per capita basis. • Compared to the 87 other cities in Los Angeles County: • City of Los Angeles ranks 9th for FY 1996-1997 • City of Los Angeles ranks 7th for FY 1997-1998 • City of Los Angeles ranks 9th for FY 1998-1999 • City of Los Angeles ranks 4th out of the 7 large California cities compared.

  4. The City of Los Angeles is in the bottom half of Los Angeles County cities in sales tax revenue earned per capita. • Sales tax growth per capita is slower in Los Angeles than countywide. • Per capita sales tax revenue in the City of Angeles is a lower percentage of personal income than in most other cities in the County. • Gross receipt tax on retail businesses in the City of Los Angeles is the highest in Los Angeles County.

  5. A key indicator of municipal decision maker priorities. • Redevelopment activity in the City of Los Angeles heavily focused on the downtown area. • Comparatively little redevelopment activity in the San Fernando Valley.

  6. Key indicator of priorities of municipal decision makers. • The City of Los Angeles ranks 10th out of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County in per capita police expenditure. • Per capita police expenditure is lower in the San Fernando Valley than the rest of the City of Los Angeles.

More Related