680 likes | 918 Views
Literary Theory. Dichotomizing Ordinary Language and Literary Language. Ordinary Language Literary Language . Meaning determinate ever-changing . Ambiguity problem goal . Surface form means to end end . Domain universals particulars . Analysis necessary; . try to complete interference; .
E N D
Literary Theory • Dichotomizing Ordinary Language and Literary Language
Disciplines linguistics; cognitive psychology; artificial intelligence; sociology; anthropology literary criticism; poetics' rhetoric; stylistics; literary history; aesthetics
Anti-Realism • Graff: literature defamiliarizes reality; criticism defamiliarizes literature
Poirier: Literature has only one responsibility--to be compelled and compelling about its own inventions
Bloom: A theory of poetry must belong to poetry, must be poetry, before it can be of any use in interpreting poems.
Scholes: Once we knew that fiction was about life and criticism was about fiction--and everything was simple. Now we know that fiction is about other fiction, is criticism in fact, or metafiction. And we know that criticism is about the impossibility of anything being about life, really, or even about fiction, or, finally, about anything. Criticism has taken the very idea of "aboutness" away from us. It has taught us that language is tautological, if it is not nonsense, and to the extent that it is about anything it is about itself. Mathematics is about mathematics, poetry is about poetry and criticism is about the impossibility of its own existence
Tallis: degrees of realism • Meyer L. Abrams (The Mirror & the Lamp)
Freund, 1987, p. 2: subversion of triangle by focusing on audience • Reader Response History
return to reader • resee language as power • I. A. Richards (1929)
We are often compelled, for example, to say things about the poem, or the words in it, which are only true of the effects of the poem on the minds of its readers... We speak of the poem’s beauty instead of entering upon elaborate and speculative analyses of its effect upon us... we come temporarily to think that the virtues of a poem lie not in its power over us, but in its own structure and conformation as an assemblage of verbal sounds
technical v. critical remarks • Jonathan Culler: structure => theory of reading (Freund, p. 79) • Stanley Fish: interpretive community
but cf. Mary Louise Pratt: linguistics of contact • Norman Holland: psychoanalytic criticism • Roman Ingarden: phenomenological: intentional creation of text • Wolfgang Iser: reception theory • Implied Reader (Tompkins); Act of Reading (Suleiman & C) • art as defamiliarizing • situated evaluation figures • hermeneutic circle • illusion-making • dialectical structure of reading • Gestalt psychology: the shifting blank • Social Interaction Model • "Freckle Juice": my entry point
the main idea • Impoverished view of author-reader relationship
interactions of author/reader • Rip Van Winkle: intro • Sokolov: multiple embedding • McPhee (Pine Barrens): • Homer (Odyssey) • Balzac (S/Z): "as though" • Potter: "am sorry" • McPhee (Bark Canoe): roles • Kundera: I understood • purposes
Mid-1700s • breakdown of patronage system • commercial printing • large reading public • mass education/standardization
unknown reader => shift to author • direct to psychic life of individuals; indirect good • Shelly: Eternal poets scorn to affect a moral aim • deification of poetry
=> ordinary language v literary language • New Criticism (focus on text; formal properties) • competition from science • Brooks & Warren: Study poetry as poetry • A poem should not mean but be
Anti-realism: Self-sufficient world; not mere representation
Wellek & Warren: The statements in a novel, in a poem, in a drama are not literally true => not logical propositions
Coleridge: That willing suspension of disbelief that constitutes poetic faith
Rhetoric of inquiry • appeal to objective authority & denunciation of rhetoric => one of most effective rhetorical strategies available • unity: all fields are rhetorical • Donald McCloskey: economics • Clifford Geertz, James Clifford, George Marcus, Mary Louise Pratt, Renato Rosaldo: anthropology • Charles Bazerman, Bruno Latour, Stephen Woolgar, Michael Lynch: science • Gerd Gigerenzer, David Murray: statistics in social sciences
Susan Peck McDonald, Robert Scholes, Terry Eagleton: literary theory
diversity: special devices linked to key questions in each field
(Clifford: “impossible attempt to fuse objective & subjective practices)