1 / 16

SUSY: Rp with . Multi-electrons events

SUSY: Rp with . Multi-electrons events. SUSY framework Signal and topology Background Expected results Conclusion. Pavel Demine (ISN Grenoble). SUSY framework. mSUGRA model : m 0 , m 1/2 , A 0 , tan( ) , sign() R-parity violated : Double production in conservated Rp

alegria-martinez
Download Presentation

SUSY: Rp with . Multi-electrons events

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SUSY: Rp with . Multi-electrons events • SUSY framework • Signal and topology • Background • Expected results • Conclusion Pavel Demine (ISN Grenoble) P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  2. SUSY framework • mSUGRA model : m0 , m1/2 , A0 , tan() , sign() • R-parity violated : • Double production in conservated Rp • Decay of LSP via Rp. • One dominant coupling : L : left-handed lepton doublet E : right-handed lepton singlet P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  3. SUSY framework • Vertex : • LSP decay with : P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  4. Signal topology (cont.) • Final state. 2 LSP decay : • at least 4 high pT leptons+ ET. P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  5. multi electron background • Physics processes. • ZZ/ZWleptons : 1.3 pb, 2.7 pb • QCD with pT > 10 + e fake :  600 pb • Fake leptons • e fake (probability  10-4) to be studied •  fake P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  6. Preliminary study with PGS • Scan in the SUGRA parameters space. • m0 : 80 to 500 step of 20 • m1/2 : 100 to 360 step of 20 • A0 : 0 • tan() : 2, 5 • sign() : +1, -1 • 1000 events per point P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  7. Trigger and events selection • Selection criteria: • Ne= 3 (|e| < 1, pT 10 GeV/c) • Mee < 80 GeV/c2 or Mee >100 GeV/c2 • Trigger simulation: • pT 1st 25GeV/c OR • pT 2nd 12GeV/c P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  8. Background P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  9. Signal trig #1: 1e pT>25GeV/c trig #2: 2e pT>12GeV/c P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  10. Trigger simulation PT 2nd e Not selected by 1e pT>25GeV/cOR 2e pT>12GeV/c trigger PT 1st e P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  11. Cross-sections sign() = -1 sign() = 1 m 0 m 0 m1/2 m1/2 P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  12. Efficiencies sign() = 1 sign() = -1 m1/2 m1/2 m 0 m 0 P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  13. Efficiencies (cont.) • 20k events for each background. • The most difficult to estimate is QCD (efake background). P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  14. Exclusion contours Backgrd studies are only beginning • L = 200 pb-1 • 90% Conf. level. sign() = 1 sign() = -1 P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  15. Run I results P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

  16. Conclusion • Exclusion contours are made with 3e final state • For more confident results : Need to use full reconstruction and PMCS. P. Demine (ISN Grenoble)

More Related