430 likes | 620 Views
A New Definition of Refraction: Basics and Beyond. Austin Roorda, Ph.D. Unversity of Houston College of Optometry. First use of Optics as Vision Aids. reading stones from 1000 AD. 1284 Salvino D'Armate built the first spectacles which were used as reading glasses.
E N D
A New Definition of Refraction:Basics and Beyond Austin Roorda, Ph.D. Unversity of Houston College of Optometry
First use of Optics as Vision Aids reading stones from1000 AD
1284 Salvino D'Armate built the first spectacles which were used as reading glasses 1451 Nicholas of Cusa uses negative lenses to cure myopia (nearsightedness) 1604 Kepler describes the optics of near and far sightedness Kepler 1268 Roger Bacon discussed possibilities of magnification with lenses Roger Bacon
1827: Sir George Biddel Airy invents spectacles for astigmatism 1748: Benjamin Franklin invents the bifocal lens
Aberrometers VISX Wavescan B&L Zywave Summit Autonomous Custom Cornea Wavefront Sciences Complete Optical Analysis System TraceyTech Tracey 1
What is the Wavefront? parallel beam = plane wavefront converging beam = spherical wavefront
What is the Wavefront? parallel beam = plane wavefront ideal wavefront defocused wavefront
What is the Wavefront? parallel beam = plane wavefront ideal wavefront aberrated beam = irregular wavefront
What is the Wavefront? diverging beam = spherical wavefront aberrated beam = irregular wavefront ideal wavefront
What is the Wave Aberration? diverging beam = spherical wavefront wave aberration
Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 mm (superior-inferior) 0 -1 -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) Wave Aberration: Defocus
Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 0 mm (superior-inferior) -1 -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) Wave Aberration: Astigmatism
Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 mm (superior-inferior) 0 -1 -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) Wave Aberration: Coma
Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 mm (superior-inferior) 0 -1 -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) Wave Aberration: All Terms
How Do We Interpret the Wave Aberrations?
Wave Aberration Contour Map 2 1.5 1 0.5 mm (superior-inferior) 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 -2.5 -2 -1 0 1 2 mm (right-left)
Breakdown of Zernike Terms Coefficient value (microns) -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 2 astig. 3 2nd order defocus 4 astig. 5 trefoil 6 3rd order coma 7 coma 8 Zernike term trefoil 9 10 11 4th order spherical aberration 12 13 14 15 16 5th order 17 18 19 20
Root Mean Square …… trefoil term defocus term astigmatism term astigmatism term
Point Spread Function vs. Pupil Size 1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm pupil images followed by psfs for changing pupil size 5 mm 6 mm 7 mm
Simulated Images 20/20 letters 20/40 letters
Strehl Ratio diffraction-limited PSF Hdl actual PSF Heye
Area under the MTF Modulation Transfer Function 1 0.9 20/20 20/10 0.8 0.7 0.6 contrast 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 50 100 150 spatial frequency (c/deg)
Can we Build a Better Autorefractor? choose the spectacle correction that minimizes the second order Zernike terms Coefficient value (microns) -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 2 astig. 3 2nd order defocus 4 astig. 5 trefoil 6 coma 3rd order 7 coma 8 trefoil 9 Zernike term 10 11 4th order spherical aberration 12 13 14 15 16 5th order 17 18 19 20
Can we Build a Better Autorefractor? choose the spectacle correction that maximizes the strehl ratio perfect PSF defocus/astigmatism
Can we Build a Better Autorefractor? choose the spectacle correction that maximizes the area under the MTF 4.5 4 3.5 3 Area under MTF (0 - 50 c/d) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 1 -1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 -1.4 -1.2 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 Defocus (D)
Can we Build a Better Autorefractor? • Challenge • RMS, Strehl, and MTF area are not correlated • Solution • population data (Rochester, Indiana) • early results suggest maximizing metrics like the Strehl ratio works best
Aberrometric Refraction • conventional autorefractors are accurate to ~ 0.5 D • aberrometric autorefractor should achieve ~ 0.1 D accuracy ** ** ± 0.25 D is an acceptable correction error
Post - RK Post - LASIK