1 / 28

Mayview Regional Service Area Plan Quality Improvement/Outcomes (QIO) Committee

Mayview Regional Service Area Plan Quality Improvement/Outcomes (QIO) Committee. November 19, 2008. Agenda for Today’s Meeting. Update on the closure and resource development Discussion of County responses to our feedback Discussion of interviewing families Wrap-up and recommendations.

alexis-long
Download Presentation

Mayview Regional Service Area Plan Quality Improvement/Outcomes (QIO) Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mayview Regional Service Area PlanQuality Improvement/Outcomes (QIO) Committee November 19, 2008

  2. Agenda for Today’s Meeting • Update on the closure and resource development • Discussion of County responses to our feedback • Discussion of interviewing families • Wrap-up and recommendations

  3. Mayview Update • 47 people in Mayview (as of 11/14/08) • 197 people have been discharged since the closure announcement • 2 units remain open

  4. Resource development As Mayview has downsized, the counties have invested funds in: • Residential options • Treatment services • Supports and resources

  5. New Residential Options • Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) and related services • Comprehensive Mental Health/Enhanced Personal Care Homes (CMHPCH and EPCH) • Long-term Structured Residences (LTSR) • Specialized Supportive Housing (aka long-term residences) • Extended Acute Services (EAC), both hospital and community-based • Residential Treatment Facility for Adults (RTF-A) • Other county-specific options

  6. New Residential Options * Regional resources are being developed by the suburban counties † State operated services that all counties will have access to ‡ While not all counties are developing, counties will have access to resources

  7. New/Expanded Community Services • Community Treatment Teams (CTT), also known as Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) • Enhanced Clinical Case Management (ECCM) • Expanded Case Management/Service Coordination • Mobile Medication Teams/Mobile Mental Health • Expanded Outpatient • Expanded Psychiatric Rehabilitation • Crisis Services

  8. New/Expanded Community Services * Through a new Clubhouse program

  9. New/Expanded Peer Support • Peer mentors • Warmline • Peer specialists • Recovery specialists (County staff)

  10. New/Expanded Peer Support

  11. Process of Using Data for Evaluation

  12. Recap: QIO Feedback for Counties • In August, we reviewed survey data for 62 people discharged from Mayview who had been living in the community for at least six months • We talked about the positive comments and experiences in the responses, and the areas we thought people needed more assistance in

  13. Our Priority Areas • Social life, family connections, community integration, activities • Work and education • Physical health, including coordination with mental health

  14. County Responses for Priority 1:social life, activities, community integration

  15. County Responses for Priority 1 (cont.):social life, activities, community integration

  16. Discussion of Priority Area 1 The Counties had different approaches to addressing this area. Their strategies fall into two categories: 1. Individual monitoring of people’s CSPs, their changing interests, and provider actions to support people 2. Listing what is available to consumers to access • Do these strategies meet your expectations for addressing this priority area? What is missing? (Discuss Committee’s responses to questions sent prior to meeting)

  17. County Responses for Priority 2:Work and Education

  18. County Responses for Priority 2 (cont.):work and education

  19. County Responses for Priority 2 (cont.):work and education

  20. Discussion of Priority Area 2 The Counties had different approaches to addressing this area. Their strategies fall into three categories: • Individual monitoring of people’s CSPs, their changing interests, and provider actions to support people • System-wide training on Supported Employment, other options • Listing what is available to consumers to access • Do these strategies meet your expectations for addressing this priority area? What is missing? (Discuss Committee’s responses to questions sent prior to meeting)

  21. County Responses for Priority 3:physical health, coordination with mental health

  22. County Responses for Priority 3 (cont.):physical health, coordination with mental health

  23. Discussion of Priority Area 3 The Counties had different approaches to addressing this area. Their strategies fall into three categories: • Individual monitoring of people’s CSPs, their changing interests, and provider actions to support people • Listing what is available to consumers to access • Distributing information to consumers • Do these strategies meet your expectations for addressing this priority area? What is missing? (Discuss Committee’s responses to questions sent prior to meeting)

  24. Quality Improvement Plan Basics • How will we measure the impact of the counties’ strategies? • What is a reasonable expectation for improvement, and when?

  25. QI Plan: Example

  26. Next steps for priority areas • What recommendations do we have for the counties on their plans? • Can we establish one most important priority area?

  27. Family Interviews • According to our data, about 80% of people discharged have some involvement with their family. • During the community support plan process (discharge planning), people’s families are asked to complete assessments and come to the meetings. • We don’t have a way to ask people’s family members how things are going for them in the community. • The QIO Committee recommended that a process for interviewing family members be developed.

  28. Family Interviews Discussion • How do we get in touch with family members while respecting the privacy of people discharged? • Who should do the interviews? • What questions should we ask family members?

More Related