Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities

1. VIR312 Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Matt McSpirit | MCSE | MCITP | VCP Senior Product Marketing Manager Microsoft Corporation @mattmcspirit

2. Compete to Win | The Series Compete to Win I - Core Virtualization II - Private Cloud On Demand Private Cloud Choices Private Cloud Comparisons

3. Private Cloud Attributes Pooled Resources Self-Service Elastic Usage Based Plus withPrivate Cloud… Control Customizable It’s cloud, dedicated to you

4. Product View Self-Service vCloud Director App Controller Service Mgmt. VMware Service Manager Service Manager Protection Data Recovery 2.0 Data Protection Manager Automation vCenter Orchestrator Orchestrator Monitoring vCenter Ops Mgmt. Suite vFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric Hyperic Operations Manager VM Management vCentervFabric Application Director Virtual Machine Manager Hypervisor vSphere Hypervisor Hyper-V

5. Licensing View Self-Service vCloud Director System Center 2012 App Controller Service Mgmt. VMware Service Manager Service Manager Protection Data Recovery 2.0 Data Protection Manager Automation vCenter Orchestrator Orchestrator Monitoring vCenter Ops Mgmt. Suite vFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric Hyperic Operations Manager VM Management vCentervFabric Application Director Virtual Machine Manager Hypervisor vSphere Hypervisor Hyper-V

6. Comparison Focus All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

7. Comparison Focus All about the App

8. All about the App Protection of Key Applications & Workloads Constructing, Delivering & Consuming Apps Maintaining, Managing & Monitoring Apps

9. demo Agile Service Delivery

10. All about the App Construction, Delivery & Consumption Standardized VM Templates Roles & Features Application Layers VM Templates 2.0: Service Templates Deploymentinto clouds Role-basedSelf Service Controlled Consumption

11. Microsoft | VMware Comparison VMware vCloud Request Manager has been deprecated with customers recommended to upgrade to VMware Service Manager Requires vCloud Director, available at additional cost Each VMware VM template will have it’s own VMDK, even if the template varies only slightly in it’s configuration options. Whilst VMware offer no alternative to Server App-V, vFabric Application Director would allow more granular control over the application layer for certain apps, and provide the ability to deploy multi-tiered services VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vfabric/VMware-vFabric-Application-Director-Datasheet.pdf

12. demo Reducing Time toResolution

13. All about the App Maintenance, Management & Monitoring Centralized Maintenance Extends beyond the private cloud Integrated Service Management Powerful, relevant automation Deep application insight ConnectingDev-Ops

14. Microsoft | VMware Comparison VMware, with Update Manager, can patch ESXi Hosts, and with the vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus, can manage physical hosts, and guest OS’s from a patching perspective. Customers would require VMware Hyperic to perform any kind of monitoring of the physical infrastructure. Both of these additional products are licensed per VM and come at considerable expense. Would require vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus and VMware Hyperic to manage any physical systems. vCloud Request Manager deprecated with customers encouraged to upgrade to the unproven VMware Service Manager, with no guarantees of integration with other vCenter Management Components. VMware's vCenter Orchestrator has a limited set of plug-ins, of which the vast majority are VMware centric. No mention of plug-ins for other enterprise management systems and tools such as those from HP, IBM, BMC etc. VMware require multiple tools to deliver any form of insight. vCenter Operations will monitor hosts, vFabric Hyperic will monitor applications on physical servers, but simply collects metrics, without providing guidance for remediation. vFabric APM required for insight into a limited number of applications Lab Manager deprecated, with customers expected to upgrade to vCloud Director, which has no connections with Development IDE. VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/compare-editions.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/service-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins.html , http://www.vmware.com/products/labmanager/overview.html

15. All about the App Protection of Key Applications & Workloads Granular Workload Protection Physical orVirtual Generic DataSource Protection Centralized, Role-Based Management Backup toTape Low-CostDisaster Recovery

16. Microsoft | VMware Comparison VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection for the workloads within the virtual machine, simply focusing on the VM itself as the protection unit and offers no protection of physical machines VMware Data Recovery 2.0 is not extensible by 3rd parties VMware Data Recovery 2.0 appliances are unaware of one another, leading to potentially duplicated backups, or missed backups. VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection to tape media. Disk only VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager provides a solution for disaster recovery, it comes at significant additional cost, which rises for each VM that is protected. VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/data-recovery/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/site-recovery-manager/features.html

17. Comparison Focus Cross Platformfrom the metal up

18. Cross Platform from the Metal Up Application Frameworks Management OS Hypervisor Fabric

19. demo Heterogeneous Management

20. Microsoft | VMware Comparison VMware vCenter manages VMware ESX and ESXi only. Would require additional 3rd party technologies to manage alternative hypervisors. VMware do not produce any operating systems, and support is therefore focused not on the guest operating system itself, but instead, on the VM Tools and hardware. A number of enterprise management tools integrate with vCenter, however VMware’s management tools, and orchestration tools lack broad interoperability with other systems. vFabric is a platform focused 100% on Spring, Java, and is available at considerable expense, on a per VM basis. Development tools are disconnected from other management tools, and only vFabric APM can provide insight into the applications, available at additional expense. VMware Information: http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/home.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins.html,http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/plugins.html. http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/

21. Comparison Focus Foundation forthe Future

22. Hyper-V Server 2012 • Free Standalone Download • Contains • Hypervisor • Windows Server Driver Model • Key Virtualization Components • Small Footprint • Minimal Overhead • Integrates into current infrastructure • Feature rich 

23. Foundation for the Future Scalability, Performance & Density High Availability & Resiliency Security & Multitenancy Flexible Infrastructure Host: 320 LP | 4TB Host: 1024 VMs VM: 64 vCPU | 1TB VM: 64TB VHDX Cluster: 64 | 4000 Virtual Fiber Channel 4K Disk Support ODX QoS Extensible Switch: PVLANS ARP/ND Spoofing DHCP Guard Monitoring Mirroring DVMQ | SR-IOV IPsec Task Offload BitLocker Live Migration Storage Migration Shared-Nothing LM NetworkVirtualization Incremental Backup Hyper-V Replica NIC Teaming Cluster: 64 | 4000 Secure ClusteredStorage Enhanced CSV 3 Level Availability Priority & Affinity Hyper-V: A More Complete Virtualization Platform

24. Comparison Focus Cloud on your terms

25. Cloud on your terms Microsoft Public Cloud System Center 2012 Microsoft Private Cloud Microsoft Private Cloud IDENTITY | MANAGEMENT | VIRTUALIZATION | DEVELOPMENT

26. Cloud on their terms vCloudConnector vCloud vCloud

27. Comparison Focus Costs of the Cloud

28. 500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud 15:1VM to Host Ratio 34 Hosts2 CPU w/ 16 Cores Windows Server licensing additional Comprehensive Management 68 CPUs of Windows Server Datacenter

29. 500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud | 68 CPUsHyper-V Server$0 68 CPUsSystem Center 2012 $122,638* Total Cost$122,638 Provides complete infrastructure management including:Application Performance Management, Self-Service, Backup & Application Protection,IT Service Management & Service Catalog, Orchestration and much more… * System Center Pricing: http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/1/1/11128EC7-2BE7-480C-9D46-4ECECA9E481A/System%20Center%202012%20Licensing%20Datasheet.pdf

30. 500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud | 68 CPUsvSphere ENT+$237,6601 • vCenter • $4,9951 vCOPS ENT$97,5002 vFabric APM$180,0003 vFabric AD$125,0004 vCloud Director$75,0005 Costs, without S&S in excess of $720,155 yet lacks service management, workload protection,in-guest management, and costs grow with density due to per-VM licensing vSphere Enterprise Plus CPU & vCenter Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.html vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/buy.html vFabric Application Performance Manager Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-application-performance-manager/buy.html vFabric Application Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-appdirector/how-to-buy.html vCloud Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-director/buy.html

31. Summary ClosingThoughts

32. Comparison Focus All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

33. Related Content • Breakout Sessions: • VIR312 - Compete to Win, Part 1: Core Hypervisors (Online) • WSV317 - Building a Private Cloud in 75 Minutes (Online) • WSV329 - Architecting Private Clouds Using Windows Server 2012 (Online) • MGT305 - Application Management in Private and Public Clouds (Online) • MGT320 - Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012: Zero to Cluster to Cloud (Online) • MGT328 - Automating Datacenter Using Microsoft System Center 2012 (Online) • MGT330 - Private Cloud Service Delivery and Automation with Microsoft System Center 2012 (Online) • MGT333 - System Center 2012: Managing Heterogeneous Environments with a Microsoft Private Cloud • Hands-on Labs: MGT71-HOL, MGT41-HOL, MGT42-HOL, MGT53-HOL, MGT54-HOL Demos: MGT01-TLC (App), MGT04-TLC (Infra), MGT05-TLC (Services) Find Me At…the Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Stand

34. SIA, WSV, and VIR Track Resources #TE(sessioncode) Talk to our Experts at the TLC Hands-On Labs DOWNLOAD Windows Server 2012 Release Candidate microsoft.com/windowsserver DOWNLOAD Windows Azure Windowsazure.com/ teched

35. Resources Learning TechNet • Connect. Share. Discuss. • Microsoft Certification & Training Resources http://northamerica.msteched.com www.microsoft.com/learning • Resources for IT Professionals • Resources for Developers • http://microsoft.com/technet http://microsoft.com/msdn

36. Required Slide Complete an evaluation on CommNet and enter to win!

37. Please Complete an Evaluation Your feedback is important! Multipleways to Evaluate Sessions Be eligible to win great daily prizes and the grand prize of a $5,000 Travel Voucher! Scan the Tag to evaluate this session now on myTechEdMobile

38. © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.