690 likes | 851 Views
Are China’s Farmers Using Too Much Fertilizer? 中国农民施肥太多?. Linxiu Zhang, Jikun Huang, Ruifa Hu and Qiang Li 张林秀 黄季焜 胡瑞法 李强 CCAP, CAS Scott Rozelle and Fangbin Qiao 罗斯高 乔方彬 UC Davis.
E N D
Are China’s Farmers Using Too Much Fertilizer?中国农民施肥太多? Linxiu Zhang, Jikun Huang, Ruifa Hu and Qiang Li 张林秀 黄季焜 胡瑞法 李强 CCAP, CAS Scott Rozelle and Fangbin Qiao 罗斯高 乔方彬 UC Davis
Chemical fertilizer plays an important role in increasing agricultural production in all developing countries, including China; China is now the largest fertilizer producer and consumer in the world ; Such high levels of fertilizer use in recent years have raised concerns about the overuse of chemical fertilizer and the negative environmental consequences that overuse would generate. 在发展中国家,化肥对于提高农产品产量有起了要作用,中国也不例外 目前中国是世界上最大的化肥生产国和消费国 最近几年,越来越关注化肥施用过量及其对环境的负面影响 Motivation 研究背景
Fertilizer use & grain production in China 化肥用量与粮食产量 Grain production (mt) Fertilizer consumption (mt)
Fertilizer use intensity(4th highest in the world) 化肥施用强度(世界第四) kg/ha
Whether farmers are overusing fertilizer from economic point of view? If so, to what extent? What have been the factors determining the level of fertilizer use? In particular, what is the role of information in this process? [in other words, are farmers just making mistakes?] Whether there are measures or policies to reverse the trend? Does extension have a role? 从经济学的角度,农民是否过量施肥? 如果是,在多大程度上过量施肥? 决定施肥水平的因素? 信息?农民决策错误? 有没有什么措施、政策可以扭转目前的趋势?农业技术推广? Research Questions问题的提出
Testing extent of overuse of fertilizer Determinants of fertilizer demand (why do they use the levels they do?) An intensive look at the role of information … and yield responses at greatly reduced levels of fertilizer … 检验过量施肥的程度 决定化肥需求的因素(农民为什么用那么多化肥?) 深入探讨信息的作用,大幅度降低施肥量是否对单产有影响? Plan of presentation 报告提纲
Data sources; Analytical methods; Empirical results; General discussions 数据来源 分析方法 实证分析结果 讨论 Test of fertilizer overuse 过量施肥检验
Jiangsu Household Survey (1996): 69 households, 138 plots; input, output & price information Hebei & Liaoning Household Survey (1995): 275 households x 2 plots; same information China National Cost of Production Survey Dataset: more than 20,000 households; 1984 to 2000 江苏农户调查(1996):69户,138块地,投入、产出、价格信息 河北、辽宁农户调查(1995):275户,550块地,投入、产出、价格信息 中国农业生产成本数据:2万多户,1984-2000共17年 Data sources 数据来源
Estimate Cobb-Douglas production function; Testing strategy: VMP of fertilizer = fertilizer price [or] VMP of fertilizer/fertilizer price = 1 Bootstrapping for robustness check 估计柯布-道格拉斯生产函数 检验方法 化肥边际产品价值=化肥价格 化肥边际产品价值/化肥价格=1 通过Bootstrapping检验稳健性 Methodologies 研究方法
Output elasticities of fertilizer use (all are statistically significant)化肥施用量的产出弹性(统计显著)
Consistent with findings by others本研究的结果与以往的研究一致
Condition for profit maximization: the value of the marginal product (VMP) of input use equals the price of the input or the ratio of VMP of fertilizer and the fertilizer price (VMP-price ratio) equals 1 利润最大化条件下 投入品的边际产品价值=投入品的价格 化肥边际产品价值/化肥价格=1 Measures on overuse从经济学的角度判断是否过量施肥
If VMP-price ratio is smaller than 1, then it means fertilizer use exceeds the optimal level 如果边际产品价值/价格<1,其经济学含义就是化肥施用量超过最优用量 Measures on overuse(con’t)从经济学的角度判断是否过量施肥(续)
Percent of fertilizer overuseNational data过量施肥的程度(全国数据)
Output elasticities of fertilizer are low, but still generate positive output at the margin Regardless of crop, time period or specification Fertilizer overuse is pervasive Regardless of crop, time period or specification 化肥施用的产出弹性低,但是边际产出仍然是正的(不论是从作物,时期还是从模型设定来看) 过量施肥是普遍现象(不论是从作物,时期还是从模型设定来看) Summary of findings小结
What are the determinants of the use of fertilizers by farmers?什么因素影响农民的施肥决策?
Good market environment will help farmers to use fertilizer more rationally (if there is poor quality fertilizer on the market, farmers may respond by using more than needed) Good extension services will help farmers reduce fertilizer use 良好的市场环境有助于农民理性施肥(如果市场上有假化肥,农民会多施) 良好的农业推广服务有助于农民减少化肥施用量 Key hypotheses 重要假说
More education helps farmers make fewer mistakes (and use less fertilizer) People with off farm jobs have high opportunity costs and will substitute fertilizer for labor (and management of careful fertilizer use), thereby leading to higher levels of fertilizer use 提高农民的受教育水平有助于农民科学决策施肥(减少化肥用量) 有非农就业机会的人劳动力的机会成本相对高,用化肥替代劳动力(施肥管理),从而导致化肥施用量偏多 Key hypotheses (con’t)重要假说(续)
Household survey data (2003/2004): 9 provinces 10 counties 400 households 800 plots 农户调查数据 9个省 10个县 400户 800块地 Data source 数据
Distribution of sample counties in China Total number of households: 401 Heilongjiang Liaoning Hebei Shandong Jiangsu Shaanxi Henan Sichuan Jiangxi 样本县的分布:401户
Fertilizer use (detailed) Control variables: Wealth (to measure if farmers faced capital constraint) Risk in gaining access to markets for grain (ZERO problems in 2003!) Risk in gaining access to markets for fertilizer (ZERO problem in 2003!) Other household/plot characteristics Soil quality Access to irrigation Etcetera 详细的化肥施用数据 控制变量 财产(资本约束?) 能否买到粮食的风险(2003年无) 能否买到化肥的风险(2003年无) 住户/地块特征 土壤质量 灌溉条件 …… Information collected 调查数据
Marketing environment: there is one aspect of fertilizer markets that may be relevant that we discovered during our fieldwork … some farmers in the sample claimed that they had purchased low quality fertilizer (jia huafei or fake fertilizer) … we asked if the perception that the presence of jia huafei was increasing or not Extension (“Did any extension agents visit the village during the previous year?) 市场环境:调查中有农民说他们买到过假化肥……农民预期市场上的假化肥是多了还是少了? 农业技术推广:去年有没有农技员来过本村? Information on Variables of Interest for Testing Hypotheses 检验假说变量
Education of household head / rest of family Opportunity cost (several measures of degree of participation of hh members in off farm labor market … tried to measure: are family members too busy to pay close attention to agriculture?) 户主/家庭成员的受教育水平 机会成本(家庭成员参与非农就业市场的程度,家庭成员是否太忙,无暇顾及农业生产?) Information on Variables of Interest for Testing Hypotheses (con’t)检验假说变量(续)
High level of fertilizer / substantial variation across the sample化肥施用量高/作物之间差异大
There was at least some evidence that households had purchased low quality fertilizer in earlier years, nevertheless in 2004 only 20 percent of households believe the presence of low quality fertilizer on the market is increasing Also, level of extension is very low 农民觉得市场上化肥质量差是一个担忧 (20%) 另外,推广服务也不到位(33%) Key information (关键信息)
Low quality fertilizer and level of fertilizer use(劣质化肥与施肥量)
Extension and level of fertilizer use(技术推广与施肥量)
Off-farm employment and level of fertilizer use(非农就业与施肥量)
We have measures of proxies for factors that may explain why farmers are using such high levels of fertilizer Some are correlated with fertilizer use … Others do not appear to be correlated … [need to examine in multivariate analysis] 可能解释农民施肥量过高的变量 一些变量与化肥施用量相关 另一些似乎不相关 需要多元回归分析 Summary of descriptive analysis: Demand for fertilizer use小结:农民的化肥需求
Fertilizer use= f ( marketing environment extension education off-farm employment Other characteristics Plot was affected by flooding or drought Household wealth Other plot characteristics ) 化肥施用量= f(市场环境、 农技推广、 教育、 非农就业、 自然灾害、 家庭资产、 其它的地块特征) Multivariate analysis (Determinants of fertilizer use)多元回归分析(化肥施用量)
Models generally perform well (in R-square sense) Many of control variables have expected signs: For example: When farmers face higher flood/drought risk, they use less fertilizer Level of wealth does not matter (insignificant) The finding of no capital constraint by farmers in the purchase of agricultural inputs is consistent with findings of a much bigger study on credit by Park and Wang 总体上模型的拟合程度好(R-平方) 多数控制变量的系数符号跟预期一致 农民面临自然灾害的话,他们少用化肥 资产水平对施肥量没有显著影响 农民购买农业生产投入时没有资产约束,这与Park and Wang的研究结果一致 Summary of findings 小结(1)
Summary of findings 小结(2) Do not matter in explaining high fertilizer use! • Marketing environment • Extension * • Level of education • 市场环境 • 农业技术推广 • 受教育水平 不能解释农民施肥量为什么这么高! * 实际上,在一些回归中,农业技术推广反而增加农民的施肥量 * In fact, in many specifications, extension leads to higher use
Off-farm employment effect is complicated: Does have significant impact (for some crops / but not others) In general, however, does not appear to have a large effect (magnitude-wise) Most prominent effect appears when variable is measuring those households with most extreme opportunity effects 非农就业对农民施肥量的影响 对一些作物的施肥量没有显著影响,但是对另一些作物有显著影响 总体而言,即便有显著影响,其影响程度也不大 对于某些非农就业机会变量,影响显著 Summary of findings 小结(3)
We admit that some of our proxies of determinants of fertilizer use may not be very good measures … Especially for information … There is a perception by some that the real problem in Asian agriculture is that farmers just do not understand the current generation of technology … 我们承认有些控制变量不太好 尤其是信息变量 一些人认为亚洲农业的真正问题在于农民不了解新一代的技术 Overall findings, however, appear to be less than satisfactory但是,总体研究结果不满意
Story: Green Revolution began … new varieties demanded fertilizer Over first years, farmers discovered that if they put on more fertilizer, yields and income increased Extension agents and officials main objective: how to convince/allow farmers to use more fertilizer 故事 绿色革命,新品种需要化肥 绿色革命初期,农民发现增加化肥用量就能增加单产&收入 农技推广人员&官员的主要目标:如何让农民多用化肥 Overall findings, (con’t)
Story: However, later generations of GR varieties have become more efficient in their need for fertilizer … fertilizers, in general, have become better (e.g., urea vs. ABC) … Farmers / extension agents / officials, however, still are in the habit of thinking: more fertilizer, the better! 故事: 但是,后来研制出的新品种的化肥利用率高……而且总体上化肥本身的质量也提高了(如尿素 V.S. ABC) 但是,农民/农技推广人员/官员还是习惯性地认为施肥越多越好 Overall findings (con’t)
CCAP and IRRI are collaborating: on trying to better understand whether or not it is poor information that is causing the overuse of fertilizer how to help farmers reduce their fertilizer use 农业政策中心与国际水稻研究所合作 是不是因为信息方面的原因导致农民过量施肥? 如何帮助农民减少化肥施用量? Joint policy experiment 多方参与的政策试验
In 2003, began experiments in rice growing areas of Guangdong and Hunan Main package of new technology called: Site Specific Nutrient Management (SSNM) … basically asks farmers to use less fertilizer but applying at the right time … 2003年开始在广东&湖北的水稻产区开展试验 试验的新技术:适时适地施肥技术(SSNM),该技术主要是要减少化肥施用量,而且适时 Joint policy experiment (con’t)多方参与的政策实验(续)
To determine appropriateness of SSNM technology for sample rice farmers; To investigate the willingness of farmers to adopt SSNM; Impact of SSNM on fertilizer use and yields To explore new approaches that can be incorporated into the extension system; 确定适合于样本农户的SSNM技术 分析农户采用SSNM技术的意愿 SSNM对化肥施用量&作物单产的影响 结合现有的农技推广体系,探索新的切入点 Specific Objectives具体目标
Randomly select sample of farmers to participate in an extension training program for SSNM (this training session is more “traditional” in that it involved mainly a lecture-like presentation of the material to the farmers) [type C farmers are those not selected to participate in training session) 1. 随机抽取一些农户参加SSNM的培训(传统意义上的培训,主要是给农民介绍一些材料) C类型农户指没有参加培训的农户 Experimental Design 试验设计(1)
Selected subset of farmers to participate in a intensive, scientist-guided experiment in the fields of selected farmers [type B farmers are those not selected for scientist-guided experiments] 从参加培训的农户中选出一部分农户,在这部分农户的地里进行一项有科学家指导的试验 B类型农户是指没有参加有科学家指导的试验的农户 Experimental Design 试验设计 (2)
Scientist-guided experiments in fields of selected farmers: [type A farmers are those in scientist-guided experiments] -- cultivated one plot using SSNM technology [plot “1”] -- cultivate one plot in traditional manner [plot “2”] 对于有科学家指导的试验 A类型农户是指参加有科学家指导的试验的农户 A类型农户在一块地上用SSNM技术(地块1) A类型农户在另一块地上沿用他原来的技术(地块2) Experimental Design 试验设计 (3)
Do household interviews of: Farmers A Farmers B Farmers C Information on: Yields Fertilizer use Other households and plot characteristics 农户访谈 A类型 B类型 C类型 收集以下信息 单产 化肥施用量 农户&地块特征 CCAP’s role as economists 经济学家在这项政策试验中的作用
Effect of technology (lower bound): Plot A1 versus plot A2 [lower bound because of unintended learning effect by Type A farmer … he/she was supposed to use traditional ways of applying fertilizer on plot A2, but, if anything, may have used less after exposure to the new information [Can also compare Plot A1 versus Farmer C] 技术的影响(下限) 比较地块A1与A2 (下届是因为A类型农户无意中的学习效应,该类型农户应该在A2地块上用原有的技术,但是他/她有可能在接触到新技术后减少化肥用量) (也可以比较A1地块&C类型农户的地块) Tests of New Technologies检验新技术作用