170 likes | 279 Views
Australian National Epidemiological Study of Self Injury (ANESSI). Sarah Swannell , The University of Queensland, Australia Prof Graham Martin, The University of Queensland, Australia A/Prof Philip Hazell , University of Sydney, Australia Dr James Harrison, Flinders University, Australia
E N D
Australian National Epidemiological Study of Self Injury (ANESSI) Sarah Swannell, The University of Queensland, Australia Prof Graham Martin, The University of Queensland, Australia A/Prof Philip Hazell, University of Sydney, Australia Dr James Harrison, Flinders University, Australia Dr Anne Taylor, Department of Health, South Australian Government 12th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour27th - 30th August 2008Glasgow - Scotland Saturday August 30, 2008 010.8.2 (0900-1100) 0915-0930
OUTLINE • Background of self injury • Population estimates of self injury • Aims • Design/sampling • Survey • Sample characteristics • Characteristics of those who self injure • Comparisons with earlier research • Imminent analyses
BACKGROUND • Deliberate self harm burdens the Australian health care system1 • Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a type of self-harm • Causes distress for patients, families and therapists2 • Is a risk factor for future self harm and suicide3,4 • Differences between self injurers and suicide attempters ‘repulsion of life’ 5 • No empirically proven treatments4 • NSSI not understoodstigmatisation/social exclusion • Need more information about the problem • Difficult to measure in population compared to clinical samples 1Steenkamp et al 2000, 2Lindgren et al 2004, 3Garzotto et al. 1977, 4RANZCP 2004, 5Muehlenkamp et al. 2004
AIMS • Prevalence and nature of self injury in Australia • Differences between those who and do not self injure • Interactions between demographic, social and individual factors associated with self-injury and their relative importance
DESIGN/SAMPLING N=217 N=8285 N=3975 N=42,938 • N=11,722 • Non-connections (80.5%) • Non-residential (11.3%) • Fax/modem (7.7%) N=3229 N=14688 N=10619 N=1093 Attempted CATI N=31,216 • N=19,206 • Refusals 48.5% • Non-contact 7.5% • Language 2.3% • Incapacitated 2.9% • Terminated 0.6% • Unavailable 1.1% 12,010 12,006
SURVEY Alcohol intake, binge drinking, tobacco smoking, illegal drugs • GHQ-12 • Dissociation (DES) • Emotion Regulation (ERQ) • Impulsivity/aggression (PIS) • Coping (COPE) • Alexithymia (TAS) Telephone and internet Neglect, sexual and physical abuse Heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, unsure Freq, rec, sev, age onset, methods, medical att., stopping, how, who knew, help seeking Ideation (GHQ-28)/attempts Demographics: age, gender, education level, work status, postcode, suburb, country of birth, main language spoken at home, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander
SURVEY • Average survey time 14 mins • Interviewed in English, Italian, Greek, Vietnamese, Chinese and Arabic • Lifeline and Kids Help Line numbers were offered at the end of the survey • Parental consent required for those under 18
PARTICIPANTS BY AGE AND GENDER 12.3% 87.7%
2006 Census ANESSI
PARTICIPANTS – EDUCATION, MARITAL STATUS AND ETHNICITY Indigenous Australians Females n=99 (0.8%) Males n=57 (0.5%)
SELF INJURY BY AGE AND SEX Overall 12-month prevalence 1.7% Overall lifetime prevalence 8.3% 12 month proportions Lifetime proportions
SELF INJURY, INDIGENOUS STATUS AND MENTAL HEALTH Indigenous (Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander) or Not Indigenous Mental Health – GHQ12
METHODS AND MOTIVATIONS Methods Motivations
COMPARISONS WITH EARLIER RESEARCH • In line with: • Ross & Heath, Laye-Gindhu et al., Patton et al., De Leo & Heller, adolescent samples, 12 month prevalence, females more likely to self injure • Hawton et al., Patton et al. & De Leo & Heller, adolescent samples, 12 month prevalence 4-6% • Ross & Heath, Muehlenkamp & Guttierrez, adolescent sample, lifetime prevalence 13-16% (our estimate was slightly lower) • Briere & Gil (1998), adult sample, no difference between genders • Muehlenkamp & Guttierrez, adolescent sample, lifetime prevalence, most common methods cutting and scratching • Lower prevalence than: • Laye-Gindhu et al. (13.2%; they included reckless behaviour), Ross & Heath (13.86%; lifetime, still higher), Muehlenkamp & Guttierrez (15.9 and 23.2%), Nada-Raja (23.5%), Hasking et al. (46%) and Lloyd-Richardson et al. (46.5%)
Imminent analyses • Age standardisation • Social exclusion • Remoteness • Dissociation • Emotion regulation • Coping • Suicidal ideation • Suicide attempt • Neglect, sexual abuse, physical abuse • Sexual orientation • Substance use