1 / 59

Equitable Services: Providing Services to Students in Private Schools

Equitable Services: Providing Services to Students in Private Schools. Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. jmauskapf@bruman.com Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013. OVERVIEW. ESEA Title IX, Uniform Provisions: §§ 9501-9506 *Governs equitable services under NINE NCLB Programs

alina
Download Presentation

Equitable Services: Providing Services to Students in Private Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Equitable Services:Providing Services to Students in Private Schools Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. jmauskapf@bruman.com Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013

  2. OVERVIEW • ESEA • Title IX, Uniform Provisions: §§ 9501-9506 • *Governs equitable services under NINE NCLB Programs • Title I-A: § 1120 • IDEA • 20 USC § 1412(a)(10)(A) • See also, IDEA Regs., §§ 300.130-300.144 • Equitable Services Implementation Plan (ESIP) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  3. ESEA General Concepts Consultation Fiscal Issues Service Delivery Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  4. ESEA Programs with Equitable Participation Reqs. • Title I, Part A • Reading First (T1-B-1) • Even Start Family Literacy (T1-B-3) • Migratory Education Program (T1-C) • Title II, Part A • Mathematics and Science Partnerships (T2-B) • Enhancing Education Through Technology (T2-D) • English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement (T3-A) • Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities (T4-A) • 21st Century Community Learning Centers (T4-B) • Innovative Programs (T5-A) • Gifted and Talented Students (T5-D-6) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  5. GENERAL RULE • LEA must provide equitable services and benefits to eligible private school students, teachers, other educational personnel, and parents Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  6. Services are Equitable when the LEA… • Spends an equal amount of funds to serve similar public and private school students • Provides services and benefits that are equitable in comparison to the services and benefits provided to public school students • Addresses the specific needs and educational programs on public and private school students on a comparable basis • Provides, in the aggregate, approximately the same amount of services • Provides equal opportunities to participate • Provides services that meet private school’s specific needs Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  7. Consultation Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  8. CONSULTATION:Must be “Timely and Meaningful” • Timely • Before the LEA makes any decisions • Meaningful • Genuine opportunity for parties to express their views • Views seriously considered • Not unilateral offer without opportunity for discussion • BUT NOTE: • LEA has final decision Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  9. Consultation must include… T1-A: 34 CFR 200.63T9: § 9501(c)(1) • How students’ needs will be identified • What services will be offered • How, where, and by whom the services will be provided • How the services will be assessed and how the results of the assessment will be used to improve services • The size and scope of services • How and when the LEA will make decisions about the delivery of services • Amount of funds available for services and how determined Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  10. Documenting Consultation • Retain documentation that shows: • Informed private school officials of available federal programs • Engaged in timely and meaningful consultation • Identified private school students’ needs • Allocated sufficient funds for private school students • Provided equitable services and benefits • Evaluated programs and services for effectiveness • Adequately addressed problems & complaints Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  11. Disagreement Re: Third Party Providers • Thorough consideration of private school officials’ views required • If LEA disagrees with private school officials re: provision of services through a contract  must provide a written explanation of the reasons why LEA has chosen not to use a contractor Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  12. Written Affirmation • LEAs must obtain written affirmation from private school officials stating timely and meaningful consultation occurred • Signed by officials from each school with participating children, or representative • Note Timing • Required by Title I-A, but not Title IX • Send to SEA and maintain in LEA’s files • Example in Guidance • T9 Note: Guidance (D-9) encourages use of ‘sign-off’ forms although not statutorily required Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  13. Right to File a Complaint • Private School Official has the right to complain to the SEA that the LEA… • Did not engage in consultation that was meaningful and timely; • Did not give due consideration to the views of the private school official; or • Did not provide fair and equitable services to private school children. • Private School Official provides basis for complaint to SEA; LEA will be required to forward the appropriate documentation to the SEA Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  14. SEA Resolution of Complaints • SEA must have written procedures for receiving, investigating, and resolving complaints from parents, teachers, or other individuals and organizations. • SEA decisions may be appealed to the U.S. Secretary of Education. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  15. Expenditures under Title IX Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  16. Equal Expenditure Guidelines (T9) • Many LEAs calculate equal expenditures strictly on the basis of the relative enrollments of public and private school students • This is not required! • Assumes the numbers accurately reflect the relative needs of students and teachers in public and private schools. • LEAs may use other factors relating to need! • Both the number and the educational needs of the public and private school students must be taken into account. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  17. T9 Expenditures, cont. • Must consult with private school officials on the method for determining equal expenditures • Resulting methodology should reasonably reflect the relative numbers and educational needs of the public and private school students • Example of how an LEA may provide private school officials with information about funding allocations for services and per pupil expenditures • T9 Guidance, J-14: Sample Funding Allocations for Services Notification Form Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  18. Deriving the Allocation, TI-A Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  19. Equitability: Deriving Allocation General Formula: • Based on number of… • Private school students • From low-income families • Who reside in Title I-participating public school attendance areas Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  20. Calculating Allocation for Instruction: • Rank public school areas: highest to lowest • Identify participating areas • Calculate PPA for each area • Calculate allocation amount for each area • Must include nonpublic low-income # • Reserve nonpublic amount • PPA x # of nonpublic low-income in each area Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  21. Set-asides Private school students also must get equitable share of some set-asides… • Off the top for districtwide instruction • *Off the top for parental involvement • *Off the top for professional development • *Par. Inv. and Prof. Dev. for families and teachers of participating nonpublic students can be provided… • In conjunction with the LEA or • Independently Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  22. Five Options for Calculating Poverty Data on Private School Students • Data from same source • Survey, with extrapolation • Comparable data from different source • Proportionality • Correlated measure Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  23. Poverty Data, cont. • Proportionality • Applying low-income % of each public school attendance area to number of private school children who reside in that area • Correlated measure • Determining the proportional relationship between two sources and applying that ratio to known source or private school students Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  24. Poverty Data: Guidance • Preferred method: Same source (FRPL) • BUT – Legis. and Regs. say equally available • May use >1 method • Use comparable income levels • No duplication Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  25. Poverty Data: Collect Annually or Biennially • Purpose: to reduce burden • Subject to consultation • Not necessary to have uniform procedure for all private schools Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  26. Additional T1-A/T9 Expenditure Considerations Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  27. Distributing the Funds • Two options: • Pooling: • T1-A: Pool all the funds to use for students with greatest educational need anywhere in LEA • T9: Pool funds for the 2+ private schools interested in this option, use in some or all of these schools • May NOT pool funds across multiple NCLB programs • School-by-School: • T1-A: Funds follow child to private school for educationally needy child in that school • T9: Based on number of children enrolled in the school Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  28. Administrative Costs • Off the top!! • Before public and private school allocations are calculated • LEA administrative costs for public and private school program • Third party provider (contractors/private companies) administrative cost (including fee or profit) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  29. Carryover If the LEA does not use all funds designated for service to private school students, how is money treated?  IT DEPENDS. • If LEA provided equitable services in first year… •  then carryover funds revert to regular program pot. • If LEA did not provide equitable services, •  then must earmark funds for services to private school students in the carryover year. •  Use in Year 2, in addition to entire amount of new allocation. • EITHER WAY: Funds remain in control of LEA. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  30. Who gets served, how, and when? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  31. Eligibility for Services Title I-A • Reside in participating public school attendance area; AND • Meet §1115 criteria • Educationally Needy • Status eligibility: homeless, Head Start, ERF, etc. Title 9 • Enrolled in nonprofit private school located in LEA • Meet specific eligibility/participation criteria of given program Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  32. Selection Criteria • Determined by LEA, in consultation • Multiple, educationally-related objective • Achievement tests, teacher referrals, grades • Poverty is NOT a criterion # of low-income ≠ # eligible for service Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  33. Delivery and Provision of Services • Directly, through private company, or another LEA • May be on-site at private school, with safeguards • Neutral, secular and non-ideological • Benefit of students, not private school • LEA controls! • LEA plans, designs, and implements program (through timely and meaningful consultation) • LEA controls all finances • *Includes maintaining title to materials, equipment, and property purchased with those funds Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  34. Examples • Instruction provided by LEA employees or third-party contractors • Extended-day services • Family literacy • Counseling • Computer-assisted instruction • Home tutoring • Take-home computers Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  35. Timing of Services • To begin at same time as public program • If not  LEA should provide additional services during the remainder of the year and carry over any unspent funds Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  36. § 1119 Staff Qualifications • Do NOT apply to: • Private school teachers or paraprofessionals • Third party contractor teachers or paraprofessionals • DOES apply to: • LEA teachers teaching private school students • LEA paraprofessionals Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  37. Professional Development • For private school teachers of participants • Not for LEA teachers of participants • Consult over appropriate services • Private school officials cannot arrange, then submit invoice to LEA Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  38. ESEA Flexibility Waivers Impact? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  39. ESEA Waivers Impact on Eq. Servs.? • Equitable Services req. is NON-WAIVERABLE • Waivers could impact in terms of ALLOCATIONS • § 1116 School Improvement (20% Choice/SES)* • § 1116 LEA Improvement (10% prof. dev.)* • *Not applicable to equitable participation • *Impact of Waiver on nonpublic allocation?  will depend upon State accountability system • Transferability • Rural LEA Flexibility • Note: Waiver Consultation Requirement Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  40. IDEA Child Find “Parentally Placed Private School Children” Consultation Proportionate Share Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  41. What is Child Find? • Identify, locate and evaluate all children that “reside in the State” and meet the definition of “child with a disability” • Includes public & private schools • Data reporting – different purposes • General child find – number served (Oct.-Dec.); • Private school child find – number evaluated, eligible, served Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  42. Child Find and Private Schools “Each LEA must locate, identify and evaluate all children with disabilities who are enrolled by their parents in private, including religious, elementary schools and secondary schools located in the school district served by the LEA.” 34 CFR 300.131(a)(2006) •  LEA must identify all “parentally placed private school children” with disabilities Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  43. Parentally-Placed Private School Children w/ Disabilities 34 CFR §§ 300.130 – 300.144 • Who are these children? • Voluntarily enrolled by their parents in private schools • Not referred to private schools to receive FAPE • Right to “equitable participation services” in IDEA Part B • NO individual right to services, not entitled to FAPE • Must spend proportionate share of Part B subgrant funds on providing special education and related services • LEA makes final decisions on services – type, how, where, by whom • “Services Plan” vs. IEP • “Must Spend” Special carry-over rule Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  44. IDEA Consultation Requirements • “Timely and meaningful” consultation • Who? • Private school representatives • Representatives of parents of parentally-placed private school children with disabilities • About what? • Child find process • Proportionate share of Part B funds • How calculated (Appendix B) • Crucial to have accurate count of eligible children Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  45. IDEA Consultation Requirements (cont.) • About What? (cont.) • Consultation Process • How consultation will operate throughout the year to ensure parentally-placed private school children with disabilities can meaningfully participate? • Provision of special education & related services • How, where, by whom • Types of services – direct or alternative delivery mechanism • How apportioned if funds insufficient for all • How and when decisions will be made Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  46. Proof of Consultation • Written explanation by LEA regarding services • Must include explanations where LEA disagrees with views of private school representatives • Signed, “written affirmation” from representatives of participating private schools after timely and meaningful consultation has occurred • Attendance/Sign-in sheet NOT sufficient • If no affirmation provided within “reasonable period of time” after consultation, forward to SEA documentation of consultation process Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  47. Private School Officials’ Right to Submit State Complaint • Complaint to SEA • Not necessarily formal state complaint procedures • Similar to right of complaint by private schools under NCLB • Basis of complaint • Consultation was not “meaningful and timely”; and/or • SEA did not give due consideration to views of private school officials Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  48. Proportionate Share Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  49. The Proportionate Share Set Aside • LEA must calculate the proportionate share for parentally-placed private school children with disabilities before earmarking funds for any early intervening activities in § 300.226. (Appendix B to regulations) • How are numbers of parentally-placed private school children with disabilities derived? • LEA determines the number, after consultation requirements Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  50. Calculating the Proportionate Share Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

More Related