220 likes | 354 Views
Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN. Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment. Workshop Goals. To become
E N D
Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment
Workshop Goals To become • more knowledgeable about the assessment of learning outcomes including appropriate methods of assessment • more aware of the value of outcomes assessment • competent at collecting and reporting the results of student learning outcomes • adept at identifying and implementing appropriate action plans to improve student learning • familiar with the website for the reporting of outcomes and outcomes assessment
Background In Spring of 2006 • All academic programs submitted 5 to 8 learning outcomes with two methods of assessment for each outcome • Workshops were conducted to provide faculty with a working knowledge to develop outcomes and to select appropriate methods of assessment
Background In Fall of 2006 • A series of workshops were conducted to provide a working knowledge to select and develop appropriate methods of assessment • Academic programs implemented initiatives for achieving their learning outcomes
“Just as diagnosis without treatment is not very helpful to a sick patient, assessment without analysis and action can do little for an institution.” -- Braskamp, 1989
Expectations In Spring of 2007 • Academic programs are expected to report • the results of each of their assessment methods • an action plan for each outcome based on their assessment results • Chairs and Deans will approve learning outcomes assessment results and action plans
Expectations In Academic Year 2007 – 2008 • Programs will • revise and submit student learning outcomes • implement action plans for improving student learning • continue with assessment activities • submit assessment results and action plan
Linkages to Other University Assessment • Academic Program Review (APR) • Department, College and University strategic planning • Program and University accreditation • Program-specific accreditation • University-wide accreditation by SACS
SACS Influence • Focus of SACS reaffirmation is on outcomes • Changes in process from previous reaffirmation cycles • Outcomes Driven • Compliance Report and Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) • Review by off-campus team • Follow-up visit by on-campus review team
SACS Influence 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness • 3.3.1 The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs (including student learning outcomes for educational programs) and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results. (Institutional effectiveness)
Outcomes and Methods Outcomes • What are outcomes? • Why are outcomes important? Methods • Why multiple methods? • Why the emphasis on direct methods?
Results • Relate to Methods • Address Outcomes • Provide Indicators for Improvement • Demonstrate student success
Results • Process • Collecting Data • Quantitative vs. qualitative • Sampling • Analyzing Data • Maintaining Data
Action Plan • Purpose • Lead to continuous improvement • Enhance effectiveness of program • Provide for efficiency use of resources • Aid in promotional efforts
What ifs… • What if our outcomes aren’t as clear as we would like them to be? • What if our methods of assessment aren’t as clear as we would like them to be? • What if we failed to collect the appropriate data? • What if our methods of assessment don’t really work? • What if our results don’t really tell us anything?
Outcomes Assessment Website The Outcomes Assessment Website serves as a university-wide repository for academic, educational-support, and administrative outcomes.
Outcomes Assessment Website • Access • Organization • Use • How to enter outcomes and methods • How to enter results and action plan • How to view plans and results www.ada.txstate.edu
Review of Outcomes Assessment • Internal • Assessment Committee • Chairs • Deans • External by SACS Reviewers • Off-site review • On-site questioning to verify process and improvement
Re-cap of Process Define/Revise Mission & Goals Identify/Revise Outcomes Create & Implement Action Plan Select/Revise Methods of Assessment Assess Student Learning Develop/Revise Curriculum and Instruction
questions and comments
For assistance, contact… • Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment 150 JCK 245-2112 • Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment 1080 JCK 245-2780