1 / 42

Real-time message scheduling in wireless sensor networks

Real-time message scheduling in wireless sensor networks. Kavitha Balasubramanian Teaching Assistant, CprE 458/558 Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011. Agenda. Introduction Wireless Sensor Networks

Download Presentation

Real-time message scheduling in wireless sensor networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Real-time message scheduling in wireless sensor networks Kavitha Balasubramanian Teaching Assistant, CprE 458/558 Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 Cpre 558: Project Presentation

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Wireless Sensor Networks • Scheduling Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks • Implementation • Conclusion Cpre 558: Presentation

  3. Agenda • Introduction • Wireless Sensor Networks • Scheduling Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks • Implementation • Conclusion Cpre 558: Presentation

  4. Agenda • Introduction • Wireless Sensor Networks • Scheduling Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks • Implementation • Conclusion Cpre 558: Presentation

  5. Agenda • Introduction • Wireless Sensor Networks • Scheduling Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks • Implementation • Conclusion Cpre 558: Presentation

  6. Agenda • Introduction • Wireless Sensor Networks • Scheduling Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks • Implementation • Conclusion Cpre 558: Presentation

  7. Introduction • Real-time systems • Hard real-time • Guarantee deadlines • Soft real-time • Improve hit ratio • Wireless sensor network applications require real-time support • Surveillance and tracking • Border patrol • Fire fighting. Cpre 558: Presentation

  8. Wireless Sensor Networks • Operate in Adhoc networks • Communication patterns • Local coordination • Sensors coordinate with one another in order to aggregate data • Sensor-base communication • Sends data from the local group to the base station • Real time sensor applications need timeliness guarantees • Schedule messages based on deadlines • Exploit spatial reuse of wireless channel • Simultaneous transmissions • Explicitly avoid collisions • Prevent false blocking Cpre 558: Presentation

  9. Scheduling Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks • RAP: A Real-Time Communication Architecture for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks • Chenyang Lu Brian M. Blum Tarek F. Abdelzaher John A. Stankovic Tian He • Scheduling messages with deadline in real time multi-hop wireless sensor networks • Huan Li, Prashant Shenoy, Krithi Ramamritham Cpre 558: Presentation

  10. RAP(A Real-Time Communication Architecture for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks) • Velocity monotonic scheduling • Deadline and Distance aware • Static monotonic velocity (SMV) • Dynamic monotonic velocity (DMV) • Higher velocity denotes higher priority Cpre 558: Presentation

  11. RAP(A Real-Time Communication Architecture for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks) • Static monotonic velocity • Dynamic monotonic velocity (DMV) Cpre 558: Presentation

  12. Scheduling messages with deadline in real time multi-hop wireless sensor networks • Application Background • Definitions • False Blocking • Algorithm details • Conclusions Cpre 558: Presentation

  13. Application Background • Examples • Searching for trapped people in a building on fire, Building map of an unknown environment • Each robot carries sub-set of sensors and has wireless connectivity • Communication over an adhoc network Cpre 558: Presentation

  14. Assumptions • Global topology information available • Messages to be transmitted available • Routing information available Cpre 558: Presentation

  15. Definitions • Arrival Time (AT) • Time at which message arrives at a node • Transmission Duration • Difference between instants when first bit is sent out and last bit is received by receiver • Data Validity • Time interval for which data value produced by sensor is valid • Also determined by start time of consuming task • Effective Deadline (ed) • Minimum of data validity deadline and start time of consuming task • Latest Start time • latest time by which a hop must start transmitting for it to reach its destination by effective deadline Cpre 558: Presentation

  16. Definitions • Message needs to travel h hops from source to destination; • mi : denotes transmission of message at the ith hop • Pd(mi) : transmission time incurred on remaining hops to destination. • LST(mi) = ed(m) – pd(mi) Cpre 558: Presentation

  17. False Blocking One hop transmission 1 -> 0 : RTS 0 -> 1 : CTS 2: Receives RTS of 1 and is blocked during the transmission of m1 3 -> 2 : RTS 2 : Blocked and does not respond 4 : Receives RTS sent by 3 and is blocked 5 -> 4 : RTS 4 : Blocked and does not respond Even though m1 and m3 can be transmitted simultaneously and do not interfere Cpre 558: Presentation

  18. False Blocking • Deadline miss: m1 : 0 to 2 m2 : 2 to 7 m3 : 7 to 9 (misses deadline) • Parallel transmissions can reduce deadline misses Cpre 558: Presentation

  19. False Blocking • Deadlock • False blocking propagates • Propagation is along circular path • In cycle {A,B,C,D,E,F,A} every second node {A,C,E} is sending RTS to the next node {B,D,F} that is already blocked and because of this RTS, the previous node gets blocked Cpre 558: Presentation

  20. Goal • Avoid collisions • False blocking needs to be eliminated for meeting deadlines • Do parallel transmissions (carefully) to meet deadline constraints • Consider potential impact of scheduling messages on future message transmissions Cpre 558: Presentation

  21. Algorithm • Channel reuse based on smallest LST first • Partition message transmissions into disjoint sets • Messages in one set can be transmitted together • Transmission in one set should complete before next one begins • Once message is scheduled at hop i, it is considered for scheduling at hop i+1 Cpre 558: Presentation

  22. m1 m2 m3 m4 Initial state Cpre 558: Presentation

  23. m1 m2 m3 m4 Divide into sets m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 Cpre 558: Presentation

  24. m1 m2 m3 m4 Transmit Messages m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 m5 m6 Cpre 558: Presentation

  25. m1 m2 m3 m4 Transmit Messages m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 m5 m6 m7 Cpre 558: Presentation

  26. m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 Transmit Messages m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 Cpre 558: Presentation

  27. m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 Calculate LST m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 Cpre 558: Presentation

  28. m1 m2 m3 m4 Sort the Message queue m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 m7 m6 m5 m8 Cpre 558: Presentation

  29. m1 m2 m3 m4 Repeat the process m1 m3 m2 m4 Set1 Set2 Set3 m7 m6 m5 m8 Cpre 558: Presentation

  30. Set Construction • Condition to join a set: • Exploit parallelism: • Arrival time of the message < Finish time • Schedule within deadline: • Finish time of message is no greater than the effective deadline. • No interference: • Current message transmission does not interfere with existing message transmissions in the set • Does not violate scheduled transmissions: • Inserting transmission into the set does not cause deadline violations for already scheduled transmissions in other sets Cpre 558: Presentation

  31. Example Cpre 558: Presentation

  32. Example • Message m1 • m1 selected first since it has smallest LST @time = 0 • S1 = {T(m1)} • s(S1) = AT = 0 • f(S1) = 2 < 6 Cpre 558: Presentation

  33. Example • Message m2 • m1 and m2 interfere. • m2 cannot be added to S1. • Create new set S2 = {T(m2)} • s(S2) = f(S1) = 2 • f(S2) = s(S2) + 5 = 2 + 5 = 7 < 8 • S1 = {T(m1)}, S2 = {T(m2)} Cpre 558: Presentation

  34. Example • Message m3 • Condition 1: Exploit parallelism • f(S1) = 2 > a(m3) : • Condition 2: Schedule within deadline • f(m3) = max(s(S1),a(m3)) + tt(m3) = 1 + 2 = 3 < d(m3) = 8 • Condition 3: No interference • m3 and m1 do not interfere • Condition 4: Does not violate scheduled transmissions • Since f(m3) = 3 > f(S1) ; fnew(S1) = f(m3) = 3; snew(S2) = fnew(S1) = 3; fnew(m2) = 3 + 5 = 8 Cpre 558: Presentation

  35. Example • Therefore S1 is feasible for T(m3) • Final schedule : • S1 = {T(m1),T(m3)} • S2 = {T(m2)} • m1 and m3 are transmitted in parallel followed by m2 Cpre 558: Presentation

  36. Example • Therefore S1 is feasible for T(m3) • Final schedule : • S1 = {T(m1),T(m3)} • S2 = {T(m2)} • m1 and m3 are transmitted in parallel followed by m2 Cpre 558: Presentation

  37. Conclusion • Advantages • Explicitly avoids collisions • Doesn’t inject infeasible packets into the system • Exploits spatial channel reuse Cpre 558: Presentation

  38. Implementation • Implemented in C++ • Input • Network topology • Collision Matrix • Distance Matrix • Routing table • Message Size • Events Cpre 558: Presentation

  39. Implementation • Results • Comparison of performance of the RAP and the CR-SLF • Deadline miss • Impact of parameter settings • Message size • Network topology • Distance • Number of events Cpre 558: Presentation

  40. Summary • RAP: Distributed • CR-SLF: Centralized • SLF without channel reuse is same as Dynamic Velocity Monotonic Scheduler • CR-SLF performs better because of channel reuse and collision avoidance Cpre 558: Presentation

  41. Questions Cpre 558: Presentation

  42. References • Scheduling Messages with Deadlines in Multi-hop Real-time Sensor Networks 11th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, San Francisco, California, March 2005. • RAP: A Real Time Communication Architecture for Large Scale Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium, San Jose, California, September 2002. Cpre 558: Presentation

More Related