820 likes | 1.07k Views
Disclosure of Financial Relationships. Dr. Beal has no significant financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose,andwishes to acknowledge and thank Dr. Behrens (NW AETC) and Dr. Susa Coffey (AETC National Resource Center) for slides shared on the AETC NRC site.. This slide set has
E N D
1. ARV ManagementSelecting the Right Regimen Jeffrey A. Beal, M.D.
Clinical Director
Florida/Caribbean AETC
2. Disclosure of Financial Relationships Dr. Beal has no significant financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose,
and
wishes to acknowledge and thank Dr. Behrens (NW AETC) and Dr. Susa Coffey (AETC National Resource Center) for slides shared on the AETC NRC site.
3. Initial Office Visit Patient LM 54 y/o white female crack cocaine addict returns to the office after being lost to follow-up for over 2 years.
8th grade education
Unemployed, lives with her mother and cares for her ill father in-law and elderly mother
HIV positive since 1996, ARV naďve
Presents stating she is ready to begin ARV therapy
4. Initial Office Visit2 Record review:
Last CD4 560 and VL 199,526 (log 5.3)
Hepatitis C positive with VL > 1 million
Toxo IgG and CMV IgG positive
HAV Ab + and HBsAb + (HBsAg -)
Past RPR and PPD negative
Prior CBC/Chemistry unremarkable
5. Initial Office Visit3 Weight is down 10 pounds otherwise VSS
LM admits to drinking 6 beers per week and is taking 2 or more hits of cocaine per day
Not sexually active at present and states understands importance of and uses condoms
She wants meds now - DISCUSSION
6. When Should Patients with HIV be Treated with ART? Benefits
reduced morbidity & mortality
immune system recovery
Drawbacks
toxicities
lifestyle changes
potential for developing resistance
7. Initial Office Visit4 Limited exam: patient agitated, difficulty with train of thought, oral thrush – mild, otherwise ENT/Lungs/Hrt/abdomen/nodes unremakable
CBC, CMP, CD4, VL, Hepatitis C VL, RPR, fasting lipid profile, urinalysis
Genotype resistance test
PPD placed
H & P with PAP scheduled in 2-3 weeks
8. Initial Office Visit5 Discussed issues of compliance with OV and meds
Negotiated decrease in crack to 1 hit/day
Negotiated alcohol to 5 beer/week
Contracted that if OV kept, will consider treating her
Dispensed condoms
9. Patient LM6 Return Visit-1 LM returns – admits to controlling crack to a hit every other day and has stopped drinking beer
Wt. ? 2 lb.; BP 140/90, otherwise VSS.
Exam Pos. findings: Thrush, liver edge 3 fb below RCM, multiple ecchymosis, vaginal candidiasis
Domestic violence screen negative, PHQ 9 consistent with mild depression, PTSD negative
10. Patient LM7 Return Visit-1 CD4 260 (12%), VL 125,893 (log 5.1)
Hgb. 10.0, Hct. 28.0 indices normal
Creat. 1.0, Est. CrCl 64, ALT and AST 2XULN, UA unremarkable, RPR negative, Lipid profile Nl., Cholesterol 80
Hep C VL 2.5 million
PPD was negative
Pelvic/PAP-candidiasis, result returned normal except inflammation and candida
Geno: L210W, M46I
11. Patient LM8 Return Visit-1 Assessment:
AIDS
Oral Candidiasis; Vaginal Candidiasis
Anemia, normocytic, normochromic
Low normal renal function
CAH C
Depression, mild
13. HIV Infection is characterized by a steady decline in the number of CD4 cells
14. mmł
15. When Should ART be Initiated?An analysis of prospective studies 13 cohort studies from Europe & North America
12,574 patients initiating ART
Median age 38; mostly men
Median baseline CD4 count 250; VL 74,000
Median month of ART initiation: 12/1997
Mostly PI-based regimens
24,310 person-years of follow-up
16. Analysis of 13 cohort studies: effect of baseline CD4 count on response to initial ART
17. Findings: effects of clinical stage on clinical progression
18. Findings: effect of baseline HIV Viral Load on response to ART
19. Initiation of ART after HIV-related symptoms had developed was associated with a less durable response to ART
For the asymptomatic patient, CD4 count at initiation of ART carried strongest prognostic significance, corroborating findings from other studies1-4
Age, infection via IDU, history of AIDS-related illness also appeared to affect durability of clinical response to ART Cohort studies: conclusions
20. Caveats High VL (>100,000 copies/mL) also carried prognostic significance, but
few patients initiated on efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted regimens
other recent studies have not demonstrated a clear correlation between baseline viral load and efficacy of ART1,2
Observational study: other potential confounding factors (e.g., adherence, hemoglobin) could have affected results
21. Implications for Clinical Practice – CD4 Cell Count Ideally, initiate ART before CD4 count drops below 200 cells/mmł and before clinical symptoms develop
A benefit for treatment before CD4 count falls below 350 may exist, but the small risk of clinical progression if therapy is deferred must be balanced against drawbacks of ART
If CD4 already less than 200 or clinical progression has occurred, ART is clearly indicated as soon as patient is ready to start
22. Implications for Clinical Practice -Baseline Viral Load Initiation of ART before VL >100,000 copies/mL may allow for more therapeutic options and greater clinical success
However, highly potent efavirenz- or boosted PI-based regimens may be equally effective in patients with high baseline viral loads1-3
VL is a marker for rate of CD4 decline: more frequent monitoring in patients with high VL?
23. When Should ART be Initiated? DHHS Guidelines
24. Considerations pre-HAART Symptoms & OI/AIDS defining diagnosis
CD4 Cell Count
Viral Load
Anticipated Adherence
25. Considerations for ARV Initiation Symptoms & Opportunistic Infections
LM with candida and AIDS by %CD4
CD4 count
LM below 350 cells/mm3
Viral Load
> 100,000
Anticipated Adherence - patient ‘readiness’
LM stating wants to start ARV
26. Patient LM9 Still substance abusing but keeping appointments
States willing to start ARV
Hep C co-infected
Likely to have virus with NRTI/PI resistance yet to be defined
Anemia confers poor prognosis
Borderline renal status
Low CD4 and High VL and statistically at high risk of disease progression
27. Patient LM10 She has only kept one appointment
She has just learned she has AIDS
She has untreated mild depression
We have only one VL and CD4 – no trend data
Will she be 95% adherent if ARV treatment started?
28. Adherence A major determinant of degree and duration of viral suppression
Poor adherence associated with virologic failure
Optimal suppression requires 90-95% adherence
Suboptimal adherence is common
29. Adherence Age, race, sex, educational level, socioeconomic status, and a past history of alcoholism or drug use do NOT reliably predict suboptimal adherence.
Higher SES and education levels and lack of history of drug use do NOT reliably predict optimal adherence.
30. Predictors of Inadequate Adherence Regimen complexity and pill burden
Poor clinician-patient relationship
Active drug use or alcoholism
Unstable housing
Mental illness (especially depression)
Lack of patient education
Medication adverse effects
Fear of medication adverse effects
31. Predictors of Good Adherence Emotional and practical supports
Convenience of regimen
Understanding of the importance of adherence
Belief in efficacy of medications
Feeling comfortable taking medications in front of others
Keeping clinic appointments
Severity of symptoms or illness
32. Patient LM10 Informed needed to confirm VL/CD4 and would draw in 2 wks.
Nutrition counseling given
Prozac 20 mg qd started
Bactrim DS 1 qd started
Diflucan 100 mg qd
Asked what she could do to control cocaine – negotiated 2 hits per week
Negotiated continued alcohol abstinence
33. Patient LM11 Provided information on simplicity and potency of current ARV
Openly admitted some patients get sicker once ARV started in response to a good ARV regimen
Discussed complexity of need to treat HIV before considering Hepatitis C treatment
Discussed importance of adherence and discussed abstinence as means to protect from obtaining HIV resistance or STD’s
34. Patient LM12 Outlined side effects that could be occur with Prozac and Bactrim
Discussed expectation that current ARV therapy should confer long life expectancy
Asked her to identify what she wanted to be doing 20-30 years from now
Offered possibility she could become a certified aid to her ailing parents or pursue other employment options in the future
35. Patient LM13 Return in 2-3 weeks for Lab
CD4, VL, CMP, CBC, TSH
Multivitamin one per day
Begin a walking program
Discussed informing partners of HIV status and importance of condoms
Introduced concept of 95% adherence
Think about formal drug/alcohol rehab.
36. Patient LM14 Return Visit 3 Patient returns in two weeks for lab
100% compliance on medication therapy
Does not feel she has a drug or alcohol problem
Has not used crack in the past one week
Still has not used alcohol
Lab drawn, behaviors praised
Introduced class side effects of RTI/NNRTI/PI
Return in one week
37. Patient LM15 Return Visit 4 Patient returns on appointment
She ‘partied’ over weekend with > 6 pack alcohol and cocaine use > 2 hits per week
She is angry she has not been able to start ARV therapy and stresses the urgency that she must stay well to be the caregiver of her parents
100% compliance with Diflucan, Bactrim, Prozac and MVI
38. Patient LM16 Return Visit 4 No thrush on exam
Weight is the same, BP normal
Still refuses consideration of counseling and drug treatment.
CD4 301 (12.2%), VL 251,189 (log 5.4)
Anemia no change
ALT/AST between 1-2 X ULN
TSH normal
No other significant lab findings
PHQ9 still mild depression but patient reports increased energy, better sleep pattern and less sadness
40. Selecting the Initial ART Regimen
41. Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Combination of at least 3 drugs, usually:
2 NRTIs (the “NRTI backbone”), plus:
1 NNRTI or 1-2 PIs
Therapy with only one or two agents allows HIV to overcome therapy through resistance mutations
44. Current Antiretroviral Medications NRTI
Abacavir ABC
Didanosine DDI
Emtricitabine FTC
Lamivudine 3TC
Stavudine D4T
Zidovudine ZDV
Tenofovir TDF
NNRTI
Delavirdine DLV
Efavirenz EFV
Nevirapine NVP
Combinations
Combivir; Epzicom; Trizivir; Atripla
Truvada PI
Amprenavir APV
Atazanavir ATV
Darunavir DRV
Fosamprenavir FPV
Indinavir IDV
Lopinavir LPV
Nelfinavir NFV
Ritonavir RTV
Saquinavir SQV
hard gel HGC
tablet INV
Tipranavir TPV
Fusion Inhibitor
Enfuvirtide T-20
45. Antiretroviral Components in Initial Therapy: NNRTIs ADVANTAGES
Less fat maldistribution and dyslipidemia than in PI-based regimens
PI options preserved for future use
DISADVANTAGES
Resistance - single mutation
Cross-resistance among NNRTIs
Rash; hepatotoxicity
Potential drug interactions (CYP450)
46. Antiretroviral Components in Initial Therapy: PIs ADVANTAGES
Longest prospective data
NNRTI options preserved for future use
DISADVANTAGES
Metabolic complications (fat maldistribution, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance)
Greater potential for drug interactions (CYP450), especially with ritonavir
47. Antiretroviral Components in Initial Therapy: NRTIs ADVANTAGES
Established backbone of combination therapy
Minimal drug interactions
PI & NNRTI preserved for future use
DISADVANTAGES
Lactic acidosis and hepatic steatosis reported with most NRTIs (rare)
Triple NRTI regimens show inferior virologic response compared with EFV- and IDV-based regimens*
48. Components of Initial ART: DHHS Categories Preferred
Clinical data show optimal efficacy and durability
Acceptable tolerability and ease of use
Alternative
Clinical trial data show efficacy but also show disadvantages in ARV activity, durability, tolerability, or ease of use (compared to “preferred” components)
may be the best option in select individual patients
Other possible options
Inferior efficacy or greater or more serious toxicities
49. Initial Treatment: Preferred Components *Avoid in pregnant women and women with significant pregnancy potential.
**Emtricitabine can be used in place of lamivudine and vice versa.
50. Initial Treatment: Alternative Components *Nevirapine should not be initiated in women with CD4 counts >250 cells/mm3 or men with CD4 counts >400 cells/mm3
**Atazanavir must be boosted with ritonavir if used in combination with tenofovir
51. Initial Treatment: Other Possible Options
52. Choosing an Initial NRTI Backbone: Resistance Little difference between 3 dual-NRTI FDCs with respect to resistance consequences at failure
All likely to select M184V at failure
ZDV/3TC
Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) emerge gradually but result in multi-NRTI resistance
ABC/3TC
L74V more likely to emerge than K65R, leaving ZDV and TDF available for later use
TDF/FTC
Emergence of K65R appears unusual
Patients with M184V and K65R may be hypersusceptible to ZDV, susceptible to d4T, partially susceptible to TDF
Strategic Use and Sequencing of Fixed-dose NNRTI’s; clinicaloptions.com/hiv
53. Co-infected Hepatitis B Emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir
Adefovir dipivoxil or entecavir
Cessation of anti-Hepatitis B therapy can result in hepatitis flares
Use of PI or NNRTI likely will result in worsening LFT (5-10 times ULN) that will stabilize over time.
54. Antiretroviral Medications: Not Recommended in Initial Treatment (1)
55. Antiretroviral Medications: Not Recommended in Initial Treatment (2)
56. Antiretroviral Medications: Not Recommended in Initial Treatment (3)
57. Antiretroviral Medications: Should not be offered at any time Regimens not recommended:
Monotherapy (except possibly zidovudine used to prevent perinatal HIV transmission)
Dual NRTI therapy
3-NRTI regimen (except abacavir/lamivudine/ zidovudine and possibly lamivudine/zidovudine + tenofovir
NRTI-sparing regimens
58. Antiretroviral Medications: Should not be offered at any time Antiretroviral components not recommended:
Didanosine + stavudine
Stavudine + zidovudine
Emtricitabine + lamivudine
59. Antiretroviral Medications: Should not be offered at any time Antiretroviral components not recommended:
Efavirenz in pregnancy and in women with significant potential for pregnancy*
Nevirapine initiation in women with CD4 >250 cells/mm3 or men with CD4 >400 cells/mm3
60. Antiretroviral Medications: Should not be offered at any time Antiretroviral components not recommended:
Atazanavir + indinavir
Amprenavir + fosamprenavir
Amprenavir oral solution in pregnancy, in children <4 years, in renal or hepatic failure, or in patients treated with metronidazole or disulfiram
Amprenavir oral solution + ritonavir oral solution
Saquinavir as single PI (unboosted)
61. Results from Comparable Trials:ITT analysis of VL <400 c/mL at Week 48
62. ARV Options for Patient LM17 Efavirenz 600 mg/d (1 cap)
OR
Atazanavir/r 300 mg/100 mg/d (2 caps)
Fosamprenavir/r 700 mg +100 mg (1 tab + 1 cap) bid
Lopinavir/r 400/100 mg/d (2 tabs) bid
63. ARV Options for Patient LM18 Tenofovir + (emtricitabine or lamivudine)
Zidovudine + (lamivudine or emtricitabine)
LM factors:
Baseline L210W
Anemia
Low normal renal function
64. ARV Options for Patient LM19 Discussing options, patient felt 1/d dosing would be important
EFV + Epzicom (2 pills hs)
Patient informed deviation from 1st choice guidelines for Nucleoside/tide backbone because?
Potential drug side effects outlined
65. Safety and Tolerability of Nucleoside and Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase inhibitors; http://clinicaloptions.com/hiv Lamivudine Generally well tolerated, with a rare occurrence of serious events
Most frequently reported serious adverse events
Blood and lymphatic events (0.2%)
Gastrointestinal events (0.1%)
Hepatic/pancreas events (0.1%)
Neuropathy (0.1%)
Serious laboratory abnormalities
Anemia/pancytopenia (0.4%)
Neutropenia (0.4%)
Thrombocytopenia (0.2%)
66. Hypersensitivity to Abacavir Serious and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been associated with abacavir sulfate, contained in TRIZIVIR
Symptoms usually appear within the first 6 weeks of treatment
Median onset = 9 days (may occur at any time)
Symptoms worsen during continued therapy with abacavir and usually resolve upon discontinuation
67. Hypersensitivity to Abacavir In an analysis of 9 clinical trials, suspected hypersensitivity was reported in approximately 8% of 2,670 patients (range: 2% to 9%)
All 9 studies used ZIAGEN BID
In CNA30024 suspected hypersensitivity was reported in 3% of patients in the comparative arm who were not receiving ABC compared with 9% in the ABC arm
Across GSK’s series of 37 clinical trials with abacavir, the frequency of hypersensitivity reactions remains 5.4%
69. ABC hypersensitivity may be more severe with qd versus bid dosing CNA30021: n = 770 treatment naďve patients randomized to ABC 300mg bid versus ABC 600mg qd
Combined with 3TC plus efavirenz (each once daily)
Equivalent treatment efficacy
? More severe hypersensitivity with qd dosing
70. Immune Reconstitution Syndrome Reflects newly invigorated immune system mounting an inflammatory response against an infection that was previously clinically silent in the face of severe immunodeficiency
Common among patients with robust rise in CD4 count (e.g., over 100 cells/mmł) in the first several weeks following initiation of ART
Typically managed by continuing ART and administering anti-inflammatory medications to control symptoms, such as NSAIDS and/or steroids
Occasionally discontinuation of antiretrovirals is necessary
71. Clinical Presentation & Course of Common Immune Reconstitution Syndromes
72. Virologic Control falls sharply with diminished adherence
73. Predictors of Poor Adherence active alcohol1 or substance2 abuse
work outside the home for pay1
depressed mood1
lack of perceived efficacy of ART3
lack of advanced disease4
concern over side effects4
regimen complexity5
74. Improving Adherence Simplify regimens, dosing, and food requirements
Engage family, friends
Utilize team approach with nurses, pharmacists, and peer counselors
Provide accessible, trusting health care team
75. Factors Associated with Higher Levels of Adherence twice-daily or once-daily regimens1,4
belief in own ability to adhere to regimen1
not living alone2
dependent on a significant other for support2
history of opportunistic infection or advanced HIV disease3
76. Factors Associated with Higher Levels of Adherence
Belief in efficacy of antiretroviral therapy
Belief that non-adherence will lead to viral resistance
77. ARV Options for Patient LM20 Scripts written
Met with peer educator
Stressed compliance and to call for any side effect
Encouraged alcohol abstinence and control of crack habit to 1-2 hits/week
Keep appointments.
78. Antiretroviral Therapy: Optimal Response
79. Follow-up Laboratory Testing CBC, CMP, and compliance evaluation within 14d of regimen start
Viral load, CD4 counts, CBC, CMP, compliance check at one month +/- lipid.
Pending one month results can monitor q 2-3 months: CBC, CD4, VL. CMP and Lipid at least q 6 months
Anticipate undetectable VL by 6 months. Trend should be downward.
Good CD4 response averages about 100 cells in one year.
80. Defining ARV Regimen Failure Virologic – persistent detection of viremia > 400 copies/mL after suppression to < 400 copies/mL
Immunologic – failure to see a rise in CD4 cell count or a decline in CD4 occurs.
81. Initial Antiretroviral Therapy: Summary ART has made HIV a treatable and manageable chronic disease for many patients
ART consists of at least 3 drugs, generally from 2 or more classes
When to initiate therapy remains controversial, but probably best to start before CD4 falls below 200 cells/mmł and before symptoms
Consider adherence and baseline viral load when designing initial regimen
82. Initial Antiretroviral Therapy: Summary Consider co-morbid conditions in choosing ARV therapy
Hepatitis B or C
Bone marrow/hepatic/renal abnormalities
Diabetes/heart disease/age
Substance abuse
Goal is undetectable viral load (<50 copies/mL) and rise in CD4 count
Monitor closely after initiation of therapy