1 / 37

Stato dei lavori

Stato dei lavori. Ottimizzazione dei wiggler di DA F NE. Simona Bettoni. Outline. Method to reduce the integrated octupole in the wiggler of DA F NE Analysis tools at disposal: Multipolar analysis: I n (also vs x shift at the entrance)

aliya
Download Presentation

Stato dei lavori

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stato dei lavori Ottimizzazione dei wiggler di DAFNE Simona Bettoni

  2. Outline • Method to reduce the integrated octupole in the wiggler of DAFNE • Analysis tools at disposal: • Multipolar analysis: In (also vs x shift at the entrance) • Tracking: x (y) and x’ (y’) vs x (y) shift at the entrance (tools Tosca+Matlab) • Shifted poles & cut poles models • Axis optimization • Analysis of the results: • Multipolar analysis • Tracking • Comparison with the experimental data at disposal • In the future

  3. Other methods to reduce the integrated octupole CURVED POLE Reduction of the octupole around the beam trajectory in the region of the poles Proposed by Pantaleo MOVING MAGNETIC AXIS Compensation of the integrated octupole in each semiperiod New method

  4. Multipolar expansion of the field with respect to the beam trajectory • Determination of the beam trajectory starting from the measured data • Fit of By between -3 cm and +3 cm by a 4º order polynomial in x centered in xT(z) = xT xT+3 cm Beam trajectory (xT) xT-3 cm

  5. The integrated multipoles in periodic magnets In a displaced system of reference: y y’ xT bAk → defined in the reference centered in OA (wiggler axis) bTk → defined in the reference centered inOT (beam trajectory) O T OA x x’ Even multipoles → Left-right symmetry of the magnet Multipoles change sign from a pole to the next one Sum from a pole to the next one Odd multipoles →

  6. Method to reduce the integrated octupole: displacement of the magnetic field WITHOUT POLE MODIFICATION In each semiperiod the particle trajectory is always on one side with respect the magnetic axis Octupole ↑ WITH THE POLE MODIFICATION Opportunely choosing the B axis is in principle possible to make zero the integrated octupole in each semiperiod In each semiperiod the particle travels on both sides with respect to the magnetic axis

  7. Optimization of the pole of the wiggler • Goals • Reduce as less as possible the magnetic field in the gap • Maintain the left-right symmetry FC1-like FC2-like FC 1 FC 2

  8. Analysis For each z fit of By vs x in the system of reference perpendicular to the beam trajectory

  9. Cut poles model: analysis perpendicular to s IFC = 693 A I3 calculated over the entire wiggler varies of more than a factor 2 if the analysis is performed perpendicular to s and not to z!

  10. Sector poles wiggler IFC = 693 A Cut the poles in z to have sector poles I3 calculated over the entire wiggler perpendicular to z is 9.09 T/m3 with respect to 4.13 T/m3 of the analysis perpendicular to z

  11. Shifted poles solution $ and field roll-off

  12. Shifted poles model For the moment shifted the coils with the poles

  13. Cut-shifted poles: the comparison of the field (at the same current = 550 A in FC) CUT POLES SHIFTED POLES

  14. Cut-shifted poles: the comparison of the field (at the same current = 550 A in FC) With the shifted poles solution, the field roll-off is improved, therefore the shims can be eliminated maintaining more or less the same dependence of the solution on the x-shift at the entrance. Shim thick in cut poles solution = 1.15 mm x 2 = 2.3 mm/37 mm = 6 % gap By(z = 0, x = 0)SHIFTED POLES = By(z = 0, x = 0)CUT POLES+7.6%

  15. Trajectory optimization Determined the best value of the current in HC to minimize the integral of By over z

  16. Trajectory optimization By integrated over z = 2 G.m • Exit angle = 8 x 10-2 mrad • x-shift exit-entrance = 0.13 mm

  17. Tools analysis: multipoles with Tosca & Matlab • TOSCA • Determination of the best beam trajectory (tracking Tosca) • For each z found By in the points on a line of ±3 cm around (xTR, 0, zTR,) and perpendicular to the trajectory • Fit of the By at each point of the line (Tosca) at steps of 1 mm (fit Matlab) • MATLAB • Determination of the best beam trajectory (tracking Tosca/0 the integral of By over z) • For each found z points on a line of ±3 cm around (xTR, 0, zTR,) and perpendicular to the trajectory • Fit of the By at each point of the line at steps of 1 mm interpolated by Matlab

  18. Tools analysis: tracking • Beam enters at several x • Tosca tracks the trajectory of each beam • Calculated the x exit-xTR NOM and x’exit in function of the x-shift at the entrance The curves are only to show the tool

  19. Axis optimization For the moment used these codes to optimize the position of the axis

  20. Multipoles Presence of spikes in my analysis

  21. Multipoles Beam trajectory at fixed Dz and parabolic interpolation in z

  22. Spikes Spikes: solved problem

  23. Axis optimization 0.73 cm Minimized I3 calculated in the entire wiggler

  24. Multipolar analysis: to summarize To do the first optimization I used this technique

  25. Analysis of the results: tracking (±3 cm) Beam enters from x = xTR NOM-3 cm to x = xTR NOM+3 cm at steps of 1 mm, where xTR NOM is the position of entrance of the nominal trajectory

  26. Analysis of the results: tracking: the x exit (±3 cm) The fit is satisfactory already for the 3rth-4rth order Coefficient of the 3rd order term = 13 m-2

  27. Analysis of the results: tracking: the x’ exit (±3 cm) Coefficient of the 3rd order term = 10 rad/m3 The fit is satisfactory for the 3th-4th order

  28. Analysis of the results: comparison with the experimental data I could compare the results only with the results of the experimental map at about 700 A Ho riscalato curva di Miro x_exit = x_exitMIRO-x_exitMIRO(xENTR = 0)

  29. Analysis of the results: comparison with the experimental data I could compare the results only with the results of the experimental map at about 700 A

  30. Analysis of the results: tracking: the y exit

  31. Analysis of the results: tracking: the y’ exit

  32. Conclusions • Shifted poles - cut poles solution comparison: • The field roll-off is improved  no shim  increased BPEAK • Cheaper • At present: • improved the linearity zone of x and x’ with respect to the field map at dipsosal • In the future: • Shifted poles solution analysis: • Analysis of the field maps by Dragt, Mitchell and Venturini (the map considered the best one by us, one with the poles more centered and one with the poles more shifted) • Measurement of the field map of the wiggler at I = 550 A to have a real comparison with the results of the simulation (at LNF, at ENEA?)

  33. Di scorta…

  34. Situation in the present configuration (I = 693 A): x exit The fit is satisfactory for the 5rth-6rth order │Coefficient of the 3rd order term │ >200 m-2

  35. Situation in the present configuration (I = 693 A): x’ exit │Coefficient of the 3rd order term │ ~600 rad/m3 The fit is satisfactory for the 6rth order

  36. Trajectory optimization To determine the best value of I in HC for the several axis displacements

  37. Fine!

More Related