150 likes | 555 Views
Introduction. Mechanical loads on cartilage -> chondrocytes expression Chondrocyte response to mechanical stimuli usually studied in vitro / in situ Need to study chondrocyte mechano-responsiveness in OA tissue. Structure and composition. Low friction Small fiber diameter
E N D
Introduction Mechanical loads on cartilage -> chondrocytes expression Chondrocyte response to mechanical stimuli usually studied in vitro/in situ Need tostudychondrocytemechano-responsiveness in OA tissue
Structure and composition Low friction Small fiber diameter Small cells, high density Strong PG/collXlinks
Structure and composition Thicker fiber diameter About isotropic Spherical cells Highest PG content
Structure and composition Thick fibers High PG content Low water content
Structure and composition Chondrocyte stiffness: ~103 lower than ECM but deformations are similar • Filtering mechanism • ECM strain 6-8%: cell strains are independent and larger • 8-14%: cell strains are smaller Modeling: Chondrocyte deformations depend on tissue BCs.
Mechanical properties of AC Viscous, porous, multiphasic, anisotropic, depth-dependent Viscoelasticity: Flow dependent / independent Interstitial fluid: Darcy’s law Compressive properties: PGs Tensile properties: collagen fibers Shear properties small shear strains: collagen fibers high shear strains: fluid (swelling pressure)
Cartilage swelling - Swelling pressure material constants hard to determine experim. FEM: swelling P incorporated to Darcy’s law - - Poroelastic pressure Swelling pressure - Total fluid stress - - Donnan osmotic pressure (ions)
Friction in cartilage Fluid film lubrication Mixture lubrication Boundary lubrication Low relative velocity (~static): rather boundary lubrication Dynamic mode / high loads: rather fluid film lubrication
AC modeling – tissue level Linear elastic single phase AC, rigid non-def SB simplisticmechanicalmodels, static / quasi-staticloading Poroelastic / biphasicmodels Biphasic: solidandfluidphases are (near) incompressible =poroelasticforincompressiblematerials Equations for solid and fluid phase (solve for displacement fields) internal stresses = external mech. forces (fluid stress, swelling P) BCs: unconfined zero PP / confined zero flux Robust model but does not take into account depth-dependent properties
Biphasic modellimitations and assumptions Geometric nonlinearity >10% strains - problem with commercial codes Fiber-reinforced models: material non-lin., but not geometric non-lin. Under large def: better use viscous, hyperelastic model for solid phase non-linear linear non-linear in displacement field Time and storage expensive Hyperelastic models: strain energy density function to derive stress/strain relationship [M]: mass lumping -> diagonalize matrix enables real-time local mesh refinement
Energy lost in AC tissue Energy dissipation • IF viscosity • ECM, collagen, GAGs, chondrocytesviscoelasticity • Drag forcesbetweenfluid / solidphases Assumption: no energy dissipation other that resulting from interactions btn phases (not valid for confined compression, viscoelastic behavior in tension) Fast-rate BC in AC tissue modeling Lack of inertial forces in the biphasic codes: pb with time varying load deformation behavior
Chondrocyte modeling – cell level Role of PCM and PCC Micro vs. macro cell is biphasic, embedded in infinite matrix Cell mechanics: Role of cytoskeleton – tensegrity models (complicated loading) Continuum model – fluid / viscoelastic or solid / viscoelastic and elastic microtubules microfilaments Intermediate filaments
Multiscale modeling of AC Problem: 104DoF per spatial dimension -> use parallel computing -> develop large-scale solution w/o small-scale details Authors suggest coupling micro/macro scales (Lagrange multipliers): Elastic potential of whole system = f(micro and macro-displacements) Run units in parallel Conventional FEM for each unit
Conclusions AC is heterogenous Be wary of limitations using commercial codes large deformations missing inertial force (pb w/ fast-rate loading) fluid phase modeled with zero viscosity 7 orders of magnitude for stiffness in cell components BCs: different in harvested tissue and in joint OA diagnosis: need for a better model of cell deformation, related mechanical loading to chondrocyte signaling (Ca2+)