1 / 28

IntEx: A Syntactic Role Driven Protein-Protein Interaction Extractor for Bio-Medical Text

IntEx: A Syntactic Role Driven Protein-Protein Interaction Extractor for Bio-Medical Text. Syed Toufeeq Ahmed Deepthi Chidambaram Hasan Davulcu Chitta Baral. Outline. Introduction Issues and Challenges Our Approach (IntEx System) Evaluation Future Work Conclusion Demo. Introduction.

alka
Download Presentation

IntEx: A Syntactic Role Driven Protein-Protein Interaction Extractor for Bio-Medical Text

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IntEx:A Syntactic Role Driven Protein-Protein Interaction Extractor for Bio-Medical Text Syed Toufeeq Ahmed Deepthi Chidambaram Hasan Davulcu Chitta Baral

  2. Outline • Introduction • Issues and Challenges • Our Approach (IntEx System) • Evaluation • Future Work • Conclusion • Demo

  3. Introduction • Genomic Research in the last decade has resulted in humongous amount of data, and most of these findings are in form of free text. • PubMed/ MedLine has around 12 millions abstracts online. • An automated tool to extract information from free text (bio-medical) will be of great use to researchers (biologists).

  4. Issues that make extraction difficult (Seymore, McCallum et al.1999) • The task involves free text – hence there are many ways of stating the same fact. • The genre of text is not grammatically simple. • The text includes a lot of technical terminology unfamiliar to existing natural language processing systems. • Information may need to be combined across several sentences. • There are many sentences from which nothing should be extracted.

  5. Challenges • Interactions specified in different ways • HMBA inhibits MEC-1 cell proliferation. • GBMs commonly overexpress the oncogenes EGFR and PDGFR, and contain mutations and deletions of tumor suppressor genes PTEN and TP53. • Protein kinase B (PKB) has emerged as the focal point for many signal transduction pathways, regulating multiple cellular processes such as glucose metabolism, transcription, apoptosis, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and cell motility.

  6. Challenges (cont.) • Anaphora resolution • Pronominals – “It activates HMBA”. • Sortal anaphora – “Both enzymes are phosphorylated”. • Event anaphora – “This reaction acts in a mediated environment.” • Multiple interactions in Complex sentences Most of the tumor-suppressive properties of Pten are dependent on its lipid phosphatase activity, which inhibits the phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway through dephosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-triphosphate

  7. Our Approach (IntEx System) • Identify syntactic roles, such as Subject, Object , Verb and modifiers of a sentence. • Using these syntactic roles, transform complex sentences into multiple simple clauses. • Extract Protein-Protein interactions from these simple clausal structures. • Simple Pronoun resolution to identify references across multiple sentences.

  8. IntEx System Architecture

  9. IntEx System Components • Pronoun Resolution • Tagging: tagging biological entities with the help of biomedical and linguistic gazetteers. • Complex Sentence Processing: splitting complex sentences into simple clausal structures made of up syntactic roles. • Interaction Extractor: extracting complete interactions by analyzing the matching contents of syntactic roles and their linguistically significant combinations.

  10. Pronoun Resolution Ku loads onto dsDNA ends and it can diffuse along the DNA in an energy-independent manner. • Pronouns in abstracts – third person - It, itself, them, themselves. • Replace pronouns with first noun group that matches the Person/number agreement. Ku loads onto dsDNA ends and Ku can diffuse along the DNA in an energy-independent manner.

  11. Tagging • Dictionary lookup using gene/protein gazetteers from UMLS, LocusLink etc.. • To tag new gene names, we used regular expressions (alpha numeric names, combination of lower case and upper case characters etc..). • Some heuristics like using proper nouns, NP chunking to improve recall. • ‘Interaction word’ list is derived from UMLS and WordNet.

  12. Complex Sentence Processing Upon growth factor stimulation of quiescent cells, Gene100 declines late in Gene101 and Gene102 is replaced by Gene103, which is absent in quiescent cells. Upon growth factor stimulation of quiescent cells, Gene100 declines late in Gene101. Gene102 is replaced by Gene103. Gene103 is absent in quiescent cells.

  13. Complex Sentence Processing • Verb-based approach. • Identify clauses in complex sentences using Link Grammar Linkages • Build simple clause sentences from them (for each main verb) in the following Clause Format: Subject | Verb | Object | Modifying phrase

  14. Link Grammar Parser(Sleator, D. and D. Temperley ,1993) Sentence: “The cat chased a snake” Link Grammar Representation:

  15. Interaction Extractor: Role Type Matching Various syntactic roles (such as Subject , Object and Modifying phrase) and their linguistically significant combinations makes up roles

  16. Roles: Examples “HMBA could inhibit the MEC-1 cell proliferation by down-regulation of PCNA expression.” Elementary (Subject) Elementary (Object) Interaction (Verb) Partial (Modifying Phrase)

  17. Interaction Extractor Algorithm Is Main Verb an Interaction (I) ? Interaction : { G1, I, G2 } Interaction : { G1, I, G2 } Elementary (G1) Partial (I,G2) Elementary (G2) complete (G,I,G)  interact: {G,I,G} complete (G,I,G)  interact: {G,I,G} complete (G,I,G)  interact: {G,I,G}

  18. Interaction Extractor Example “HMBA could inhibit the MEC-1 cell proliferation by down-regulation of PCNA expression.” Main Verb { “HMBA”, “down-regulation”, “PCNA expression”} Elementary Elementary { “HMBA”, “inhibit”, “the MEC-1 cell proliferation” } Partial

  19. A Detailed Overall Example

  20. Evaluation (Recall comparison with BioRAT) IntEx and BioRAT from 229 abstracts when compared with DIP database. DIP (Database of Interacting Proteins) – is a database of proteins that interact, and is curated from both abstracts and full text.

  21. Evaluation (Precision comparison with BioRAT) Precision comparison of IntEx and BioRAT from 229 abstracts.

  22. Errors Analysis

  23. Future Work in Interaction Extraction • Handling negations in the sentences (such as “not interact”, “fails to induce”, “does not inhibit”). • Extraction of detailed contextual attributes of interactions (such as bio-chemical context or location) by interpreting modifiers: • Location/Position modifiers (in, at, on, into, up, over…) • Agent/Accompaniment modifiers (by, with…) • Purpose modifiers( for…) • Theme/association modifiers ( of..) • Extraction of relationships between interactions from among multiple sentences within and across abstracts/full text articles. (Protein Interaction Pathways)

  24. A bigger future: combining automated extraction with mass collaboration • `Curation’ is expensive. • Automated extraction – miles to go • Vision: automated extraction with mass curation • The CBioC system: www.cbioc.org

  25. Conclusion • Verb-based approach to extract protein-protein interactions • Handles complex sentences • Easy to scale up , and to use in other domains (we are working on it to use on other domains too). • Protein name tagging needs improvement, and we are working on using other methods. • First release version is almost ready for both Windows and Linux platforms.

  26. References • Link Grammar: http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link • LocusLink (Now Entrez Gene): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink • UMLS: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/umlsmain.html

  27. References (cont.) • Blaschke, C., M. A. Andrade, et al. (1999). "Automatic extraction of biological information from scientific text: Protein-protein interactions." Proceedings of International Symposium on Molecular Biology: 60-67. • Corney, D. P. A., B. F. Buxton, et al. (2004). "BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers." Bioinformatics 20(17): 3206-3213. • Friedman, C., P. Kra, et al. (2001). GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles. Proceedings of the International Confernce on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology: 574-82. • Rzhetsky, A., I. Iossifov, et al. (2004). "GeneWays: a system for extracting, analyzing, visualizing, and integrating molecular pathway data." J. of Biomedical Informatics 37(1): 43--53. • Seymore, K., A. McCallum, et al. (1999). Learning hidden markov model structure for information extraction. AAAI 99 Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Extraction • Sleator, D. and D. Temperley (1993). Parsing English with a Link Grammar. Third International Workshop on Parsing Technologies.

  28. Thank you !

More Related