1 / 4

DAQ Software Support for PSEC at ANL and MTEST

DAQ Software Support for PSEC at ANL and MTEST. Ed May HEP Division Argonne National Laboratory. PSEC group meeting Talk Presented 8 April, 2008. Goals.

allegra-mendez
Download Presentation

DAQ Software Support for PSEC at ANL and MTEST

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DAQ Software Support for PSEC at ANL and MTEST Ed May HEP Division Argonne National Laboratory PSEC group meeting Talk Presented 8 April, 2008

  2. Goals • Design and implement Linux based DAQ system for Lecroy FERA based CAMAC system to readout and store data from 4 MCP-PH in Time-of-Flight test beam. • Two systems • Small 2 MCP-PH system for testing and development at ANL, using FERA camac, Wiener CC-USB serial camac interface. • Larger complete system to support 4 MCP-PH and beam readout which works in MTEST computer and camac environment. This using the JY411 parallel highway. • Both should use the common MTEST DAQ software framework and software with the only differences be the CAMAC driver and camac list readout. Nearline readback of stored data should read both systems.

  3. Issues – 20 questions • The 20 questions have large overlap with John’s presentation, so will not repeat duplicates. • What is data to be captured? • MCP-PM • Beam related data eg wire-chamber, scalers … • Special test or calibration data • How much data? Per spill, Per run, Per conditions… • At what rate? • What online and/or nearline monitoring is required? • Online: event dump, scaler prints, fixed raw histograms, end-of-run stats • Nearline: read back of disk stored data during run and after EOR, user driven simple analysis based on ?. Makes Ntuples for Offline analysis

  4. Issues continued • Figure of merits: • Can full DAQ system reliably reach required electronic resolution of 1-2 psec • At what beam event/trigger rate eg ~10KHz • What is the availability of MTEST computing systems available for software and hardware testing before the June test-beam run? • What are lead-time issues: • Is all DAQ hardware in hand? • Document the “data record”, review by group • Prepare time-line. • Who are the principal consumers of the disk data? Are there offline and re-analysis issues after the test-beam ends.

More Related